by Larry Magid

Unlike some of my fellow Internet safety activists, I think that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers did the right thing by rejecting the proposed .XXX top level domain designation. See Story

For the record, in addition to my work as technology commentator, I run SafeKids.com and Safeteens.com and am co-director of BlogSafety.com.

Despite years of advocacy on the part of its sponsors, I remain unconvinced that that the .XXX top level domain would have furthered the causes of child protection or free speech. It might have been effective had it been mandatory for all porn sites, but that would have brought up enormous free speech issues that many of us would not fathom. Because it would have been voluntary, there would continue to be porn sites with .com TLDs, possibly giving parents a false sense of security by believing that all porn was walled off. I don’t agree with those who say it would have promoted porn nor do I fully agree with those who fear that such a voluntary process would have been a likely first step towards government regulation. I do, however, understand why some adult site operators and civil libertarians would worry about that, especially if the voluntary xxx didn’t cut back significantly on the use of .com for porn site.

(more…)

by Anne Collier
NetFamilyNews

The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline has 1,434 MySpace friends - and counting (1,417 at the beginning of this week). That means 1,434 MySpace users have a link on their profiles to the Lifeline. This past year, just one of those profiles referred nearly 14,000 people to the national hotline. “Our site received more than 128,000 unique visitors from MySpace in the past 12 months,” the Lifeline’s Christopher Gandin Le told me, referring to the Lifeline’s Web site (as opposed to its MySpace page). Even though MySpace donated $3 million in Lifeline ad placements a month this past year, only 13,000 of those 128,000 referrals actually came from the Lifeline’s own MySpace profile. “It’s individuals who are exercising the power they have to help their friends and visitors,” said Le, who is resource and information manager for the federally funded network with 120 call centers around the country. The support they give callers is free, confidential, and available 24/7, and they receive 1,300 calls a day nationwide (if someone doesn’t answer after six rings, the call bounces to the nearest crisis center). But they don’t only help people in suicidal crisis. The crisis centers get questions about depression, relationships, loneliness, substance abuse, and how to help friends and loved ones, I learned from Ginny Gohr, director of the Girls and Boys National Hotline, which is both local to Nebraska and the backup national hotline in the Lifeline network (its tagline: “Any problem. Any Time.”). For more on this and the Lifeline’s growing presence elsewhere on the social Web, please click to this week’s issue of my newsletter.

By DAVID FINKELHOR

Discuss this article in our forum

“What are you doing here?” asks NBC’s Chris Hansen, as he steps into the room to confront would-be child molesters in the fabulously successful “To Catch a Predator” series. But as the show now takes its extended national tour into Florida, having left Texas with one suspect dead and one district attorney fuming, perhaps it is time to ask Hansen and his colleagues the same question.

Is it really a good idea to have a TV program conduct undercover sex crime investigations? Simple as it may seem to impersonate a 13-year-old online and attract a swarm of felons, undercover police work in this field is a highly technical business. It requires knowledge of the legalities concerning entrapment and the admissibility of evidence.

It requires awareness of complex state laws around sexual solicitations of minors. It merits professional understanding about the dynamics of sex offenders, and appreciation of the possible dangers to innocent neighbors, show staff and the suspects themselves. The Texas DA believes that if local police had not been catering to “Dateline’s” cameras and entertainment priorities, they might have averted the suicide.

A large corps of law enforcement professionals, the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Forces, funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, are engaged in hundreds of these undercover investigations around the country. They are well-trained specialists with detailed protocols to handle these cases. Most of them want nothing to do with “To Catch a Predator.”

Is the program promoting vigilantism? We all want to be crime fighters. You can bet that dozens of folks in living rooms and office suites are now plotting sequels to this new reality TV blockbuster.

But law enforcement should not be a free enterprise zone, where any combination of public citizen and media enterprise can stake out a claim. It is the quintessential function of government, because there are risks to our freedoms if this function is abused, and we want careful legal structures and public accountability to govern its operation.

Is it a good idea to make a public spectacle out of vengeance and humiliation? Part of what attracts the millions of viewers to this show is a chance to see a person completely and totally humiliated, as their dirty little sexual secret is exposed to the judgment of the whole world. It is a degradation ceremony we only tolerate against someone we judge to be completely beyond any claim to any decency or compassion, which is how we are entitled to feel about would-be child molesters in the logic of the program.

People guilty of committing these acts should be punished. However, this massive and irrevocable punishment is being meted out well before the careful deliberation of the justice system has had a chance to deliver its verdict.

But even if these offenders were certifiably guilty, is public humiliation the proper punishment? There is no question that millions of Americans would tune in to watch murderers being put to death in Texas or Florida. It used to be argued that such public executions were a strong deterrent against crime. But they were discontinued in the United States after 1936 in part out of the sense that it is not consistent with our values and in the public interest to mobilize outpourings of vengeance and to exacerbate the strong primal passions that swirl around heinous crimes. The public humiliation of sex offenders especially in the absence of any legal process belongs in the same historical dustbin.

Chris Hansen and “Dateline” have performed an undeniable public service in alerting the world to the dangers that lurk on the Internet and the need for energetic efforts to police and protect in this domain. But this show should not become an institution. It is time to declare their mission accomplished and turn the job over to the professionals.

David Finkelhor, director of the Crimes against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, is a nationally known researcher in the field of child sexual abuse and Internet crimes against children