Adopt-A-Beach
Beaches and Dunes Beach Maintenance Reimbursement Fund Coastal Contacts Coastal Coordination Council Coastal Erosion Coastal Funding Sources Coastal Impact Assistance Program Coastal Management Program Coastal Publications Coastal Wetlands Oil Spill Prevention and Response Permitting Assistance Resource Management Codes Texas Beach Watch Wetnet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil Spill | Administrative Penalty Policy for Violations of the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act of 1991GeneralThe goal of the Texas General Land Office (Land Office) is to protect and preserve Texas coastal waters in as pristine a condition as possible, while at the same time partnering with the oil production and transportation industries to promote strong local and regional economies. To that end, the Land Office's Oil Spill Prevention and Response Division implements programs designed to reap positive contributions to the health of the Texas Coast. The basic philosophy of the Land Office is that all oil spills are preventable and that repeat oil spills are an indication of process or procedural failure on the part of the repeat offender. This Administrative Penalty Policy for Violations of the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act of 1991 was developed to further that philosophy and will be reviewed annually to determine its effectiveness in reducing the number of oil spills and repeat offenders. Written comments regarding the policy should be sent to:
The penalty provisions detailed in the Unauthorized Discharge Matrix are focused on repeat violations of the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act of 1991 (OSPRA) by the same operation or organization within the twelve-month period immediately preceding a spill event. These violations represent the nucleus around which the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Program was developed. Consistent with the goal of the Land Office, implementation of this matrix is designed to provide an incentive to the regulated community to decrease the number of repeat spills by application of a graduated penalty assessment that is tempered when an effective and recognized Sound Management Practices Program is in place. Naturally coincidental with the implementation of such a program, organizations that are successful in preventing oil spills over a twelve month period are assessed the smallest penalties when they are the responsible parties for an accidental unauthorized discharge. A program by which an entity is deemed to have in place a Sound Management Practice Program includes at a minimum the following items:
The Unauthorized Discharge Matrix in this document supports the OSPRA regarding the assessment of administrative penalties in that the following factors are considered:
The Prevention and Response Penalty Matrices are designed to provide guidance for assessment of penalties for specific violations of the OSPRA not directly attributable to unauthorized discharge or failure to notify violations. Most of the violations listed in these matrices, though generally associated with a spill event, are distinctly identified in the OSPRA or the implementing regulation and are considered as either prevention or response actions. Penalties for violations identified in this matrix may be increased for multiple violations within the preceding twelve-month period dependent on a review of the circumstances. Penalty Matrix StatementThe Land Office will use these matrices as guidance in assessing penalties with the intention to assess penalties at the minimum levels. Aggravating circumstances, however, may cause the penalty assessed to be higher. The following are examples of circumstances where penalty assessments may be increased from the baseline. This list represents some common considerations and is not meant to be inclusive of all possible circumstances.
Unauthorized Discharge MatrixThe following matrix applies to all unauthorized discharges where oil has entered Texas coastal waters. The time period for determining the number of spills appropriate to this matrix is the twelve-month period immediately preceding the spill in question. For example, an unauthorized discharge that occurred on January 31st will require the inclusion of the responsible party's history of unauthorized discharges since February 1st of the previous year to determine the appropriate penalty box to enter. Repeat unauthorized discharge violations may subject the responsible party to a comprehensive review of spill history and pollution prevention processes including, if appropriate, a review of the responsible party's Sound Management Practices Program. When discharges are small, the Land Office may elect to issue an "on the spot" ticket if no other aggravating factors require an increase in an assessed penalty amount. Unauthorized discharges where the amount entering coastal waters is greater than 1 gallon requires a calculation of a per barrel penalty equal to the multiplication of the number of whole barrels (42 U. S. gallons) by the amount indicated by the appropriate penalty box. For example, if an unauthorized discharge of 5.5 barrels was the 3rd spill during the preceding twelve-month period, and it occurred at a location where a Sound Management Practices Program was in place, the responsible party would be assessed a $900 penalty.
Sound Management Practice (SMP) in place
Sound Management Practice (SMP) not in place
** Figure applies to all spills greater than the 4th spill in the twelve months immediately preceding the spill in question. Prevention and Response Penalty Matrix
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||