This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

United States District Court
for the
Eastern District of Oklahoma


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

CITY OF STILWELL, OKLAHOMA,   
et al.,

                  Defendants.

 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Case No. CIV 96-196 B

STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

The United States hereby respectfully requests that this Court extend the time for it to file a Reply to defendants' response to the United States' motion for summary judgment up to and including January 9, 1998. This is the United States' first request for such an extension in this case.

On November 13, 1997, the United States filed a dispositive motion for summary judgment. After receiving a 15-day extension, defendants served their response by mail on December 11. The United States received that response today, December 17. An extension is necessary and appropriate given the lateness of actual service, the upcoming holidays, and the importance of the motion. Defendants' counsel stated that he has no objection to an extension.

    Respectfully submitted,



______________________________
JOHN R. READ
MICHELE B. CANO
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
325 Seventh Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 307-0468

December 17, 1997