|
Summary of Evidence
CA 125 Levels, Transvaginal Ultrasound, and Pelvic Examinations
Statement of benefit
Statement of harms
Note: Separate PDQ summaries on Ovarian Cancer Prevention; Ovarian
Epithelial Cancer Treatment; Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor Treatment; and Ovarian Low
Malignant Potential Tumor Treatment are also available.
CA 125 Levels, Transvaginal Ultrasound, and Pelvic Examinations
Statement of benefit
There is inadequate evidence to determine whether routine screening for ovarian cancer with serum markers such as CA 125 levels, transvaginal ultrasound, or pelvic examinations would result in a decrease in mortality from ovarian cancer.
Description of the Evidence
-
Study Design: Evidence obtained from cohort studies.
-
Internal Validity: Poor.
-
Consistency: No studies have evaluated the impact on mortality from ovarian cancer.
-
Magnitude of Effects on Health Outcomes: Not applicable.
-
External Validity: Not applicable.
Statement of harms
Based on solid evidence, routine screening for ovarian cancer would result in many diagnostic laparoscopies and laparotomies for each ovarian cancer found.
Description of the Evidence
-
Study Design: Evidence obtained from cohort studies.
-
Internal Validity: Good.
-
Consistency: Volume of evidence is limited but consistent and coherent.
-
Magnitude of Effects on Health Outcomes: The number of surgeries performed per invasive cancer diagnosed with combination screening using CA 125 measures and transvaginal ultrasound is about 30.
-
External Validity: Good.
Back to Top
< Previous Section | Next Section > |
