“The Open Internet: Preserving the Freedom to Innovate”

September 21st, 2009 by Julius Genachowski - Chairman, Federal Communications Commission.

Julius GenachowskiThe Internet is the most transformational communications breakthrough of our time. It has become essential to the fabric of the daily lives of Americans.

More and more, the Internet is how we get news, information, and entertainment; how we stay in touch with our friends and family; how we work and start new businesses; how we — and people across the globe — learn about our communities and express points of view.

The Internet has also been an extraordinary platform for innovation, job creation, economic growth, and opportunity. It has unleashed the potential of entrepreneurs and enabled the launch and growth of small businesses across America.

The key to the Internet’s success has been its openness.

The Internet was designed to be “future-proof” — to support ideas, products, and services that today’s inventors have not yet imagined. In practice, it doesn’t favor or disfavor any particular content or application, but allows end users, content creators, and businesses of every size and in every sector of the economy to communicate and innovate without permission.

Notwithstanding its unparalleled record of success, today the free and open Internet faces emerging and substantial challenges.

We’ve already seen some clear examples of deviations from the Internet’s historic openness. We have witnessed certain broadband providers unilaterally block access to VoIP applications and implement technical measures that degrade the performance of peer-to-peer software distributing lawful content. We have even seen one service provider deny users access to political content.

And as many members of the Internet community and key Congressional leaders have noted, there are compelling reasons for concern about even greater challenges to openness in the future, including reduced choice in the Internet service provider marketplace and an increase in the amount of Internet traffic, which has fueled a corresponding need to manage networks sensibly.

The rise of serious challenges to the traditional operation of the Internet puts us at a crossroads. We could see technology used to shut doors to entrepreneurs instead of opening them. The spirit of innovation stifled. A full and free flow of information compromised.

Or we could take steps to preserve a free and open Internet, helping to ensure a future of opportunity, prosperity, and the vibrant flow of information and ideas.

I believe we must choose to safeguard the openness that has made the Internet a stunning success. That is why today, I delivered a speech announcing that the FCC will be the smart cop on the beat when it comes to preserving a free and open Internet.

In particular, I proposed that the FCC adopt two new rules to help achieve this.

The first says broadband providers cannot discriminate against particular Internet content or applications. The second says broadband providers must be transparent about their network management practices. These principles would apply to the Internet however it is accessed, though how they apply may differ depending on the access platform or technology used. Of course, network operators will be permitted to implement reasonable network management practices to address issues such as spam, address copyright infringement, and otherwise ensure a safe and secure network for all users.

I also proposed that the FCC formally enshrine the four pre-existing agency policies that say network operators cannot prevent users from accessing the lawful Internet content, applications, and services of their choice, nor can they prohibit users from attaching non-harmful devices to the network.

This is just the first step in what will be an ongoing process. While these goals are clear, the best path to achieving them is not, and involves many hard questions about how best to maximize the innovation and investment necessary for a robust and thriving Internet. That is why we have created www.OpenInternet.gov.

This site is a place to join the discussion about the free and open Internet. OpenInternet.gov is in Beta, and we’ll be adding features to enable participation in the near future. I encourage you to check it out to offer your input, or simply to read or watch today’s speech.

With the help of all stakeholders, the FCC can help secure a bright future for the Internet, and make sure that the garage, the basement, and the dorm room remain places where inventors can not only dream, but bring their ideas to life.

And no one should be neutral about that.

(Cross-posted on Huffington Post)

Field Hearing in Austin, TX

September 21st, 2009 by Mark Wigfield - Spokesman, Omnibus Broadband Initiative.

In an effort to solicit input from the public in the development of a National Broadband Plan, the Commission will host a field hearing on September 21, 2009, in Austin, Texas. FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker will represent the Commission and two panels will explore the challenges of broadband deployment in Texas, including spectrum access, infrastructure, and rural issues.

Click here to watch the event live and submit your questions to have them asked during the Q&A session. Use hashtag #BBwkshp or email them.

After today, the next two field hearings will be on October 1 in the Washington, D.C. area, and October 6 in Charleston, South Carolina.  Watch the blog and the news page of broadband.gov for details.

Collaborating On Bringing Broadband To People With Disabilities

September 18th, 2009 by Gray Brooks - FCC New Media

Today, we are launching a new category on Blogband called “disabilities access.”  In this category, we will start with five posts tracking the five panels that we have tentatively proposed for our October 20th follow-up workshop on disabilities access.  The first five posts solicit information relating to workshop planning and policy issues on the following topics:

  • Accessibility and Affordability Barriers Faced by People with Disabilities
  • Technological Barriers and Solutions
  • Furthering National Purposes and People with Disabilities
  • Federal, State, and Local Resources to Make Broadband Accessible and Affordable to People with Disabilities
  • Policy Solutions and Recommendations

This new process has tremendous potential to shape our work on the national broadband plan.  It will allow many more people to have input on the structure and substance of our upcoming workshop.  It will also make possible in-depth, collaborative discussions on complex topics – of which there are many.  In sum, we hope to facilitate an iterative process in which diverse parties can build from and react to the ideas of others, in a productive and thoughtful manner.  And, of course, we welcome your ideas about how we can make this process more accessible.

Public Notice Seeks Comment on Ensuring Accessible and Affordable Broadband for People with Disabilities

September 18th, 2009 by Elizabeth Lyle - Attorney Advisor, Broadband Team

Today we released a Public Notice, or PN, asking for recommendations to ensure that broadband technologies are accessible and affordable to people with disabilities.  The large number of questions in the PN makes it clear that we have a lot to do if we are going to formulate meaningful policy.  There are numerous, complex issues to discuss and distill in the coming months, and it is critical that we work collaboratively with all stakeholders to get this right.  Here is how you can help:

  • Help us plan the structure and substance of our upcoming workshop on Oct. 20. We invite suggestions on panel topics, exhibits, speakers and additional questions.  We also welcome your ideas for background material that may be helpful for us and all those participating in the workshop.  Our goal is to use the workshop time as effectively as possible to help us formulate policy recommendations.  You can give us your input by filing comments in the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) by using either ECFS Express or our standard submission page if you need to attach a file.  Please note in your comments that they are responding to NBP Public Notice #4 or in response to a blog that we will be posting for each panel in Blogband (see more details below).  The sooner you file your suggestions, the better.
  • Respond to questions in the PN by October 6. Before we can make policy recommendations, we have to understand better the accessibility and affordability barriers faced by people with disabilities; the technological barriers and solutions; the potential of broadband to advance certain national purposes (related, for example, to health care, education, public safety, job creation/worker training, and civic participation/community development) for people with disabilities; resources existing at the federal, state, local, and tribal level that we can leverage to make broadband accessible and affordable to people with disabilities; and the effectiveness of regulatory and non-regulatory mechanisms in promoting accessibility and affordability for people with disabilities.  To the extent that commenters are able to help us gather information in advance of the workshop, we can both build on this information and narrow the focus of the workshop accordingly.  We would also appreciate your help in identifying commenters who may be expert at certain issues (e.g., on barriers faced by those who have intellectual disabilities) who have not participated in this proceeding (or perhaps any other FCC proceeding) to date.  File comments as described above, and once again, please mark your submission as responsive to NBP Public Notice #4.
  • Participate in the new disability access policy blog.  As mentioned above, we are establishing a “disabilities access” category on Blogband where we will post five different blog posts to track the tentative panels that we propose for our workshop.  That is, we will have posts (and ongoing threads) on (1) Accessibility and Affordability Barriers Faced by People with Disabilities; (2) Technological Barriers and Solutions; (3) Furthering National Purposes and People with Disabilities; (4) Federal, State, and Local Resources to Make Broadband Accessible and Affordable to People with Disabilities; and (5) Policy Solutions and Recommendations.  The posts will cover the same kinds of questions that are set forth in the PN.  We know that many of the issues that we raise would benefit from having an ongoing, iterative process in which we could collaborate on these issues before and after the workshop.  We also will post new blog posts when we want to focus on a particular topic in more detail.  And, as noted above, we also invite comments relating to workshop planning in response to these posts.  Finally, if you want to initiate an idea not covered in the blog posts, we encourage you to do so by going to broadband.ideascale.com and clicking on accessibility for people with disabilities.

How valuable is broadband to you?

September 18th, 2009 by Scott Wallsten - Economics Director

The answer to that question is crucial for informing data-driven broadband policy.  While those of us who spend most of the day online in one form or another are tempted to respond that it’s “invaluable,” we’re hoping to answer the question with a little more precision.

Knowing how much people value broadband would be necessary, for example, for designing an efficient subsidy program for low-income people or for predicting the number of subscribers to a new network in an unserved area.

Valuing broadband is complicated because people use it so differently and because it comes in so many flavors.  How much do people value different attributes of broadband, like speed, latency, or the simple “always on” aspect that was broadband’s selling point in its early days?  For people who are already online, how much more do they value speeds beyond what they currently have?  Similar questions are relevant for content.  How much do people value different services and online content?  How do those answers differ among different groups of people?

The economics literature is surprisingly sparse on this question.  Some of the best work was done by Professors Scott Savage and Donald Waldman at the University of Colorado, Boulder.  Unfortunately, their work used data from 2002, meaning that the results aren’t particularly useful to us anymore.  After all, the web was different then.  There was no YouTube or Facebook, and Wikipedia had only recently launched.  Only about 10 percent of American households subscribed to broadband, compared to more than 63 percent today.  In short, data from 2002 just won’t do.

One of the many projects we’re doing here is working to fill that gap in the economics research.  We’re collecting new survey data that better captures what people value today, and will use that data to update the relevant economics research.  That updated research can, when combined with the many other projects underway at the task force, help contribute to a rational and effective broadband plan.

Four Hours

September 17th, 2009 by Jennifer Flynn - Adoption Manager

You’ve seen the workshops and the flurry of fact-gathering for the National Broadband Plan. And that is continuing even as we start pulling information together for a September 29 Commission meeting on the Plan. During that meeting, we’ll provide the Commission with a comprehensive look at what we have found to date in a mid-project progress report. Because we have a lot of facts and data to report from a number of discrete teams, we have blocked out four hours on the Commissioners’ busy schedules for the meeting.

What do all those facts tell us about the status quo? What do the facts say about the distance between where we are and where we want to be? Who’s been in our shoes before and what can we learn from their experiences? What hurdles do we face, and how can we remove or navigate around them? What existing advantages can we benefit from, and how can we maximize them? What can we create or suggest that is new to improve broadband deployment, adoption, and usage, in light of national purposes, as envisioned by the Recovery Act? We’ll take a stab at these and other questions during the meeting.

Don’t expect a full picture yet. This a short list of conceptual questions we’re in the process of trying to answer across a broad range of subject matter relevant to drafting a National Broadband Plan. Four hours understandably sounds like four hours, but there’s a lot of ground to cover.

Staff Workshops Look at Health Care, Content and Spectrum

September 15th, 2009 by Mark Wigfield - Spokesman, Omnibus Broadband Initiative.

This week’s staff workshops at the FCC take on three interesting topics related to the National Broadband Plan:  telehealth, online content, and spectrum.  The first workshop is today at 1:30 with a discussion of health care and broadband.  On Thursday morning at 9:30, the discussion turns to online content and the balance between making content easily available while protecting against piracy.  On Thursday afternoon at 1:30, three separate panels discuss spectrum supply and demand, sources of spectrum, and technologies to facilitate more productive spectrum use.  As always, the public can attend the staff workshops in person or online.

More Avenues for Online Participation

September 14th, 2009 by Haley Van Dÿck - FCC New Media

Haley Van Dyck 2We are excited to introduce the latest round of new media roll outs that will help increase the participatory elements of the FCC’s online operation and facilitate open discussion on the National Broadband Plan.

In addition to participating in the Broadband Workshops online and engaging in discussion on Task Force blog posts, you can now share your ideas on the National Broadband Plan through our new IdeaScale page.

broadbanddotgov header

IdeaScale is a crowdsourcing platform that allows users to publicly share and discuss ideas, as well as vote on their favorite ideas and topics presented.

This platform will provide a place for comprehensive and robust discussion of the sometimes controversial issues facing the task force, and will allow the fruitful conversations that have developed from the workshops to continue long after the panels have adjourned.

Our goal is to tap the distributed expertise of the American people through an open and earnest discussion on the best options for broadband in this country. We realize that government does not monopolize the best ideas, which is why we are making public engagement a priority.

I hope you take this opportunity to share your ideas and help advise the task force as it prepares to submit a plan to Congress by February 17th.

In another effort to bring 21st century communications to the agency and increase online citizen participation, you can now find the FCC on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter as well. We have also added over 40 new RSS feeds from the FCC, ranging from Commissioner’s Statements to announcements of Public Notices.

These are just a few updates from our New Media Team’s first month at the FCC. There will be many more to come.

The Limits of Philosophy

September 11th, 2009 by Blair Levin - Executive Director, Omnibus Broadband Initiative

Blair LevinMy old friend Randy May recently criticized our staff workshops as focusing too little on  regulatory philosophy.  But that, I told him, was by design.

Randy was kind enough to say the workshops have been a useful exercise in involving more people and compiling data.  But I’m afraid his suggestion that we focus foremost on philosophy would have doomed our effort to deliver a comprehensive broadband plan to Congress by Feb. 17, 2010.

Why?  Congress, for starters, told us to devise a plan that will connect every unconnected home.  So if you were trying to solve that problem, where would you start?  With philosophy or facts?

Obviously, you need the facts.  We need to know how many homes are unconnected, where they are, what the technological options are for connecting them, the cost.  Staff got a lot of helpful facts from our workshops, and is busy gathering additional data on this and many, many other questions right now.

Before too long, we will deliver facts and options to the Comissioners, and it will be time to begin discussing philosophical issues, such as the appropriate role of the public sector.  But to do so now would cut off critical fact-gathering.  Moreover, fact-gathering based on a particular regulatory philosophy could effectively blind us to the importance of information that is right before our eyes.

So step back, Socrates.  There’s method in our madness.

For my more complete thoughts on this subject, read the speech I gave at Randy’s conference celebrating the publication of a new book he just edited on “New Directions in Communications Policy.”

Conversation with the Chairman…

September 10th, 2009 by Mark Wigfield - Spokesman, Omnibus Broadband Initiative.

Julius Genachowski, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, speaks about his vision on the National Broadband Plan, revitalizing the FCC, and increasing innovation at the agency.

Download .mp4 Transcript

The FCC must be a twenty-first century agency for the information age, New media technologies can help achieve that important goal. Using innovative online tools will enable the Commission to perform more efficiently and communicate more effectively.  They will also encourage the widest possible participation in what the FCC does and harness the communications expertise we have all over the country.

-
Julius Genachowski, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission



Broadband.gov is in beta release. We would like to hear your feedback and suggestions.
Capture The Phone Numbers Using Your Camera Phone


If you have a camera and a 2D matrix code reader on your mobile phone, you can capture the FCC Phone numbers right to your phone by following these three easy steps:
Step 1: Take a photograph of one of the codes below using the camera on your mobile phone.
Step 2: Use your phone's Datamatrix or QR Code reader to decode the information on the photograph. Please note, these code readers are device specific and are available to download on the internet.
Step 3: Store the decoded address information to your phone's address book and use it with your Maps or GPS application.

Datamatrix and QR FCC Phones