Bob Latta

Blog

Blog | Blog

Latta Signs Letter Asking for Full Committee on Agriculture Hearings for H.R. 2749

Posted by Congressman Latta on July 28, 2009

Yesterday I joined Congressman Frank Lucas (R-OK), Ranking Member on the House Committee on Agriculture, and other House Republicans to voice my opposition to H.R. 2749, the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009. In short, this bill would give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unprecedented authority and oversight to further regulate our nation’s agriculture and livestock industry. In addition to the policies within this bill, the House Democrat Majority is attempting to sidestep the legislative process and rush this bill to the House floor for a vote.

I will continue to voice my opposition to this bill and call for full Agriculture Committee hearings.

Dear Colleague,

I am writing to express my opposition to legislation (H.R. 2749, the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009) scheduled to be considered under suspension of the rules this week.

Our nation has the safest food supply in the world. Even so, we must continually examine our food production and regulatory system, and move forward with changes that improve food safety. But to do so without thoughtful and careful deliberation is simply irresponsible. H.R. 2749 is the result of a flawed and incomplete process. It will lead to huge regulatory burdens on our nation’s farmers and ranchers, and it contains very little that will actually contribute to the goal of safer food.

H.R. 2749 is another expansion of federal power without the benefit of careful consideration. This is the stimulus package, cap and trade, and – soon – the health care bill all over again. This legislation was rolled out in draft form and marked up in the Energy and Commerce Committee over a couple of weeks just last month.

And, despite a clear jurisdictional claim, the Majority of the House Agriculture Committee did not demand a referral of the bill, did not conduct hearings on its provisions, and did not allow the Committee to work its will to make improvements. During a recent Committee hearing on the general topic of food safety, not a single producer witness would support this bill in its current form. The failure to act is a stunning failure on the part of our Majority to fulfill our legislative responsibility.

One provision of particular concern would mandate the Food and Drug Administration to set on-farm production performance standards. For the first time, we would have the federal government prescribing how our farmers and ranchers will grow crops.

Farming, the growing of crops and raising of livestock, is the first organized activity pursued by man. We have been doing it for a long time. And we have been doing it without the FDA.

Farming and ranching is an immensely complex endeavor involving a vast range of processes. Imagine every food you can. Now consider the varied growing regions – California, Florida, Minnesota, Texas, Hawaii, Kansas and my home state of Oklahoma. Now consider the various ways farmers produce crops: some raising commodities, others growing to detailed contract specifications, some are organic farmers, others are producers committed to sustainable practices, and some are very small farming operations producing food for increasingly lucrative local markets.

Now, imagine that the federal government is going to dictate how all of that is done. I think you have a pretty good idea of the chaos that is going to ensue.

There are other problems in the bill as well – new penalties, recordkeeping requirements, traceability, federal license to operate, licensing fees, country-of-origin labeling – all of these things do absolutely nothing to prevent food borne disease outbreaks, but will do plenty to keep federal bureaucrats busy. These are issues that can be worked out through the normal legislative process, but only if there is a process.

H.R. 2749 should not be considered under suspension of the rules. It should be referred to the House Committee on Agriculture, we should have hearings to consider its provisions, and we should make the appropriate improvements. For these reasons, I urge my colleagues to not suspend the rules and to vote against H.R. 2749.

Our nation’s farmers, ranchers, packers, processors, retailers, and consumers deserve better.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frank D. Lucas (R-OK)
Ranking Member

Comments

The opinions expressed below are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily represent those of this office.

Ted Wagner commented on 7/29/2009

I agree with your views on this bill. Thanks
Bridget & Rolfe Coyle commented on 7/31/2009

Please continue to support Ohio's agriculture on all levels. Anything that works against our farmers is another step towards our downfall on all levels. Economic, social and ultimately healthcare. The economy will suffer as many know because agriculture is still a mainstay for many Ohio families, social structure will be affected by the impact of loss of production of certain foods or amounts of foods available as farmers are forced out of business and finally the lack of fresh nutritious affordable foods will ultimately have an adverse affect on our citizens. Importing foods by its very nature will cause an increase in prices that many of our unemployed already feel the stress of having to deal with. I'd hate to see our society resort to violence or stealing just to feed their families. But it does happen. Keep up the good work Congressman Latta we appreciate your efforts.
NA Olson commented on 8/3/2009

Yes, yes, PLEASE continue to oppose H.R. 2749!! This bill would not only hamstring many smaller agricultural concerns, the food producing backbone that has fed our country for centuries before the advent of industrial commercial conglomerate farms, but it would also adversely impact the very sustainable biodiversity that will protect that food supply. This is akin to plugging the entire country into the same power grid -- if one parts goes out, then we all go out. Another good reason to oppose H.R. 2749 is that smaller producers that live close to their customers tend to have less issues with e.coli or other recalls. Media frequently reports on large commercial concerns with outbreaks of disease causing bacteria such as e.coli or salmonella, often due to the intensive farming practices that work against the nature of what is being produced. This is especially true in the livestock and poultry industries, although many large scale vegetable producers have also had recalls for contaminated foods. These recalls often exact a terrible toll from affected people and their families through illness and/or death of a loved one as well as the financial burden of dealing with the initial care and often ongoing care for something that never needed to happen at all. The high fiscal cost generated by one of those outbreaks through the necessity of health care, clean up, damage control, and loss of consumer confidence which in turn affects the economic arena is avoidable and , in fact, ought to be nonexistent! By contrast, reports of any issues with smaller, often local, producers are exponentially fewer; this is primarily because of the human component. When you are feeding a neighbor or a friend there is automatically a higher level of safety accountability than with a large-scale commercial producer across the country whose focus is on fiscal concerns rather than feeding. This translates not only into healthier products, but healthier people with more confidence in the food they feed their families. To remove or severely restrict the ability of smaller farms in our nation to continue the tradition of American Produce for American People will further increase our dependence on foreign oil as well as foreign food production. H.R. 2479 is a bad idea for America. Please use everything in your arsenal to shoot this particular turkey down. Thank you!

Bob Latta

Blog

Blog

E-NEWS SIGN UP

SPOTLIGHT

WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE

BOWLING GREEN OFFICE

DEFIANCE OFFICE

NORWALK OFFICE