Home
Videos
Photos
Welcome
About
Legal
Search
Archive

Navigation Top Navigation End
Public Affairs Must Inform Foreign Policy
Posted by Philip J. Crowley on Jun 01, 2009 - 04:32 PM

Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs P.J. Crowley, Washington, DC, May 29, 2009. [State]

About the Author: P.J. Crowley serves as Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs.

Last week, I began my tenure as the Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs.  I am humbled and exhilarated by the task before me and am grateful for the trust and confidence President Obama and Secretary Clinton have placed in me.

Almost 20 years ago, I was assigned to Germany, one of the highlights of my 26 years serving with the U.S. Air Force.  I have been contemplating those days as I prepared for this assignment.  During my time in Germany, the Berlin Wall ceased to divide East from West.  The people of East and West Germany literally pushed until the wall was breached and ultimately removed.

In the aftermath, when given a choice, the people of Eastern Europe rejected Communism and moved swiftly to associate themselves with the rule of law, market economies and responsible and accountable governments.  This success was due in no small measure to institutions like the United States Information Agency, Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, which helped foreign publics understand that they could have the rights and opportunities of free people.  This was public diplomacy at its best, and proved to be a cornerstone of our policy of containment.  Now, Secretary Clinton’s focus on using smart power – the full compliment of diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal, and cultural tools is leading us back to a balanced approach to foreign policy that served us well throughout our history.

As we know, global challenges hardly disappeared with the end of the Cold War.  Today, we continue to combat extreme ideologies in an expanding conflict in Afghanistan while dealing with festering violence in Iraq.  Success in this current struggle will require the same kind of patience, determination and skill that we demonstrated during the Cold War – identifying a clear, peaceful and modern alternative to the people of the world, reinforcing our strategic narrative while diminishing that of extremist insurgents.  As Secretary Clinton stated in her recent testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the State Department is seeking the resources to deploy a new strategic communication strategy to buttress our foreign policy.  Ultimately, we cannot succeed unless we build and sustain public support at home and around the world.

Today’s global communications environment is dramatically different than it was even a few years ago.  A digital image can be transmitted from anywhere in the world at an instant, as we saw with the cell phone image of the execution of Saddam Hussein and its impact.

One of my goals is to have the State Department communicate its message more strategically.  In order to do this, we must be dynamic and use all available means both old and new media - traditional methods such as the Daily Press Briefings as well as experimenting with new media, such as Facebook, Twitter, and video through the Internet.  The culmination of this effort will be a virtual presence that is engaged in a global dialogue, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, in all corners of the world.

Given the expanded nature of the communications environment, Secretary Clinton decided to restructure the Bureau of Public Affairs.  I will serve as the Assistant Secretary, but not as the every day spokesman for the department.  One of my foremost responsibilities will be to ensure that public affairs informs public policy.  This is why you’ll hear me repeatedly coming back to the idea of a strategic communications plan.  My task, working with Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Judith McHale and the newly designated spokesman, Ian Kelly, will be to serve as the senior advisor to the Secretary, contribute to the administration’s interagency strategic planning and lead the Bureau of Public Affairs and the dedicated public affairs professionals at the State Department and around the world.  I am an avid Red Sox fan.  Judith is a Yankees fan and Ian, a Cubs fan, but we are united by a higher calling and significant challenges.

Tackling these global challenges – extremism, nonproliferation, climate change, global health and food security just to name a few – will require, as Secretary Clinton has said repeatedly, coordinated, international partnerships at the government-to-government and people-to-people levels and all variations in between.  In order to build and sustain such partnerships, we must communicate effectively.  Effective communication is a two-way street, so as much as I look forward to keeping you informed on new initiatives, I’m even more eager to hear your ideas.




Your First Name:


Email: ( Optional )


Location: ( *Required )


Please enter the word you see in the image below:

How do you spell the word believe82 ?

Post Your Comment



Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS

Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Subscribe to this entry's comments via RSS.
Subscribe to the Comments RSS


Comments

Joel in New Mexico writes:

The fearless, dignified demeanor of President Zelaya as he crossed into Honduras under the guns of the Honduran military and under threat of arrest should shame the State Department into taking the steps it should have taken weeks ago: suspend the bank accounts and the visas of those who committed the coup.

Shame, shame on our State Department, which smirked rather serve justice and international law. May it now redeem itself by taking up the cause of defending the right of a free people to choose their representatives free of the fear of military reprisal.


Posted on Fri Jul 24, 2009


Joel in New Mexico writes:

I was shocked and dismayed by the tone of your remarks on 7/20 regarding Honduras. One of the journalists asked you whether U.S. irritation with Venezuela was justification for the coup. You did not deny it. You also spoke about President Zelaya being taught a "lesson." The message that Latin America heard, loud and clear, was a boast that the U.S. was behind the coup. Surely that is not what you intended?

Americans who have not spent significant time in Latin America do not have a clue as to how arrogant their pronouncements can sound. For a century, right up through the invasion of Panama -- indeed, right up to the attempt to topple Chavez -- the U.S. invaded, occupied, and ordered coups of Latin American governments on a whim. Almost invariably, we claimed to be supporting democracy even as we armed and supported brutal dictators. Extremist movements such as FARC and communism did not arise because the people were ignorant. They arose out of desperation, because to paraphrase John Kennedy, the United States made peaceful change impossible and therefore made violent revolution inevitable.

The tone you took in your press briefing was irresponsible and seriously damaged U.S. interests in Latin America. Latin Americans need to know that, whatever we may think about the governments they elect, we respect them enough not to try to overrule them. They need to know that when coups attempt to impose de facto dictatorships, we will be staunch in solidarity with Latin America in ensuring that those illegal regimes do not stand.

The State Department has been doing an elaborate dance about whether the coup was illegal and whether we need to cut off aid. I suppose that is intended to get the coup leaders to stay at the table. But what it communicates is that the U.S. government is soft and indecisive on what is a black-and-white matter. Even the coup leaders have admitted that the expulsion of President Zelaya was illegal! People have been shot dead by the army, the Constitution has been suspended, and over a thousand people have reportedly been arrested by a military dictatorship. And yet the U.S. government is parsing international law -- which demands due process -- to the point that everyone in Latin America is convinced that elements of the U.S. government ordered the coup.

As a military man, Colonel Crowley, you should at the very least have enough self-discipline to stay on message. But as my representative in dealing with Latin America, I would hope that you would stop coddling criminals and start whole-heartedly supporting the rule of law.


Posted on Wed Jul 22, 2009


Doug G. in California writes:

My congratulations to you, PJ. I was reading the LA Times one evening, and the TV news was on, and I heard a familiar voice. I looked up and there you were. Darn, spilled my red wine right down the front of my shirt. I am so proud of you.


Posted on Fri Jul 10, 2009


Eric in New Mexico writes:

Interview with doctor who tried to save Neda's life, eyewitness as well to who killed her:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8119658.stm


Posted on Fri Jun 26, 2009


Eric in New Mexico writes:

@ PJ Crowley,

To sum the Iranian events up in terms we can both relate to, we are at that inflection point where the ball either goes through Billy Buckner's legs or not in terms of making a difference along with the international community.

Will the Iranian people know the agony of defeat, and have to wait until the "curse of the Babe" is lifted to be granted that magic moment in the sun?

As Red Soxs fans, we can afford to be patient, and long suffering...it has an end. I won't speak for the Iranian people on that score.

Here's a pretty fair assesment of what's going on in Iran, in my opinion.

All I never wish I knew about the regime's designs as well as an effective international response to it can be summed up here and now, if we want the results we seek as a matter of national interest.

http://tinyurl.com/n9xruy


Posted on Mon Jun 22, 2009


Eric in New Mexico writes:

PJ Crowley,

The only apporpriate response to the charges of "interference" in Iranian affairs by the US, is simply that the following evidence justifies our "responsibility to protect" populations when violence is used upon them en mass, indiscriminately.

Along with all other nation's responsibilty, I might add.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRga9Zm-QYA

It goes without saying that those leading state sponsors of terror consider a life to be worthless, unless it be their own.


Posted on Mon Jun 22, 2009


Eric in New Mexico writes:

@PJ Crowley,

The only apporpriate response to the charges of "interference" in Iranian affairs by the US, is simply that the following evidence justifies our "responsibility to protect" populations when violence is used upon them en mass, indiscriminately.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRga9Zm-QYA

It goes without saying that those leading state sponsors of terror consider a life to be worthless, unless it be their own.


Posted on Mon Jun 22, 2009


Eric in New Mexico writes:

"MR. CROWLEY: Well, ultimately, the measure of this is how the Iranian people view their government and view this election, and whether they see the government as being legitimate. This is not about the United States. This is about a debate that has been generated inside Iran. That debate is continuing as we speak. And it?s for the Government of Iran to satisfy the questions and the concerns that clearly their people have."

- Press Briefing, June 17

@ PJ Crowley

A long-running debate to be sure, but let me suggest at what point this nation must decide whether it is or not legitimate and speak up as we did with Mugabe, and also the Kenyan elections.

When any government structure through corrupion, fraud, and violent repression seeks to sustain its control over a population against their will.

Seeking to hide its activities through repression of media and communications, is symtomatic of the above.

When the Guardian Council's investigation of almost 700 separate complaints regarding election fraud are complete without charges brought and no appreciable justice for the people's concern met, then will be the time to step up to the plate and call a sham what it is sir.

That would then be the right and fair thing to do in support of the Iranian people's legitimate aspirations for freedom.

In the meantime, let's put this topic on the boards for public debate here, and help give Iranians a voice in the matter.

Thanks, and all my best to Sec Clinton for a speedy recovery.

EJ


Posted on Thu Jun 18, 2009


Donald in Virginia writes:

The situation in North Korea is very unstable. I believe there should be an international price to be paid when a country tests nuclear devices. A one billion dollar fine should be imposed by the United Nations. The sad part is how the two young American ladies captured and sentenced to 12 years of hard labor, will be a pawn in North Koreans attempts to blackmale the world. "Human shields" It also shows how weak the Leadership is by taking two women into custody. I hope the Leader of North Korea reads this message, because he still has to answer to God for capturing innocent women, trying them in court, sentencing them for 12 years of hard labor. It just proves how narrow minded and ridicious the leadership acts. The two women were obvious news reporters NOT Spies. Explaining the difference, ONE Spies for intelligence, News People Report the news. Maybe one day the leader of North Korea will learn to understand the difference and feel even shorter in life. However, he still can do right by releasing the two American women and get them home to their families. It is also written that if a country holds innocent people, God's wrath is greater than Mans Wrath! Our prayers and thoughts are with the two American women, May God deal with this situation and grant them the release before God casts Judgement on North Korea!!! Remember this God has never needed a military, missiles, or nuclear weapons, he can bring hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, Trumpets of Thundering and Lightning, fires and diseases plagues on a country. My most humble suggestion, Release the two women before God answers the call. Then maybe God will forgive the country of North Korea for it's foolish acts!!!

RELASE THE TWO AMERICAN WOMEN ASAP!!!


Posted on Wed Jun 10, 2009


Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:

On occasion, it would be nice to reverse the public affairs job and communicate back to the State Department about how absolutely outraged U.S., Mexican, and Canadian citizens are about having to buy passports in order to cross the U.S. border.

Europeans are under the identical terrorist threat that Americans are -- France experienced months of muslim riots -- yet Europeans can travel almost everywhere in Europe without "papers" or passport, so it proves that passports do not hinder terrorism, they hinder tourism.

All of the 19 terrorists of 9/11 reportedly had valid passports so passports mean nothing at all to terrorists -- if they need one, they will get one.

The passport requirement is another meaningless bureaucratic measure to justify government taxation on the right to travel -- a right guaranteed to be free of federal taxation by our U.S. Constitution.

Our government has the power to tax only as stated in that document, and there was no taxation power for a federal permit or license to re-enter the country. Our Supreme Court had held that the right to travel is a fundamental right, a human right, a natural right not granted by any government but inherent in our very existence.

There is no reason for a passport requirement when every driver's license contains a person's picture and national residence, and every automobile has a license plate, and every person has a name and a face.


Posted on Wed Jun 03, 2009


Masood in California writes:

Mr. Crowley, congratulations on an opportunity to serve for a higher cause! The way events are shaping up your job will be more important than ever before. You are right, we cannot win and succeed unless we build and sustain public support both at home and around the world.


Posted on Tue Jun 02, 2009


Eric in New Mexico writes:

Obviously there's an element of humor inherent in Public Diplomacy that poses a rational threat to the status quo.

I don't know what baseball has to do with it, but if you are implying that Public Diplomacy on steroids is the way to go, I'm all for it.

Frankly, Sportsfans (and I'm one of those died-hard-long ago-and resurrected Bosoxs fans..., I'd like a little honorable competition on a level playing field to come back to the sport as well as among nations in general.

Best idea shot out of the park wins most approval. Play ball!

Here's where policy intersects with the human condition...

Bin Laden climbs K2 in search of of the Wise One's cave to ask him what the meaning of life is...

After much struggle and frostbite he climbs up the last cliff face to the entrance and kneels before the fire, exhausted.

"What up, Homie?" the Wise One asks..

"My name is Ossama Bin Laden! not Homie!!! I'm the world's most renoun terrorist, and I come to demand the answer to the meaning of life!"

The Wise One leaps up from his lotus position in one fluid Jackie Chan move and kicks bin laden flying out the cave and down the cliff face, never to be seen nor heard from again.

The Wise One sits down again and turns to his apprentice and asks for more tea, holding out his cup.

The apprentice having now been addressed and free to speak asks while he pours tea.., "Teacher, why did you kick the man from the cave when he was seeking enlightenment?"

"I figured he'd learn on the way down." the Wise One chuckled.

"I hope I do not have to attain enlightnment in such a manner, as your humble apprentice."

The Wise One smiled and said, "Homie, I would never choose an apprentice that was too stupid to live."

And so they sat drinking tea, the apprentice pondering what being stupid entailed... The Wise One contemplating the danger of idiots gathered in large numbers.

---

Congrats and welcome aboard sir!


Posted on Mon Jun 01, 2009


Donald in Virginia writes:

Welcome aboard to the State Department and GOD Speed. Were Red Sox fans here, along with New England Patriots, Boston Celtics and ofcourse the Bruins Hockey team. I wish you all the success and the multitude of challenges ahead with everything that is happening in the world today. People in most towns and cities do not have a clue as to the impacts of what other countries can have on them. I myself try to keep up to date, so I know or have an idea what to expect. Good Luck and look foward to seeing you on the blog!


Posted on Mon Jun 01, 2009

Page 1 of 1 pages