Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Denying the Petition for Review of the Final Order of the Federal Trade Commission, and Thereby Sustaining the Divestiture and Other Requirements of the Final Order
Brief of Respondent Federal Trade Commission, Filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., et al., v. Federal Trade Commission, Docket No. 05-60192, On Petition for Review of A Final Order of the Federal Trade Commission.
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Petition for Reconsideration of the Final Order [Public Record Version]
Order Clarifying Respondents' Obligations As To The Pitt-Des Moines and CB&I Corporate Names
August 24, 2005
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Motion For In Camera Treatment of Material
Previously Designated As Confidential [Portions of Complaint Counsel's Response to CB&I Respondents'
Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues] [Public Record Version]
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Motion For In Camera Treatment of Material
Previously Designated As Confidential [Portions of Respondents' Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues]
Letter Filed by Duane M. Kelley, Jeffery A. Leon, Gregory J. Miarecki, Andrew Shapiro, Lance W. Lange, David E. Dahlquist, Ms. Danielle A. R. Coffman, Michael Mayer, Christopher B. Essig, James Herbison and Ms. Nada Sulaiman, Esqs. of Winston & Strawn Withdrawing Their Appearance [PDF 38K]
March 17, 2005
Petition for Review in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company v. Federal Trade Commission [PDF 266K]
March 15, 2005
Order Granting CB&I's Motion for Clarification; Denying as Moot CB&I's Motion for Stay; Directing Further Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification; and Denying as Moot CB&I's Request to Toll the Time Period For Filing Petition for Review [PDF 273K]
February 28, 2005
Respondents' Motion for in Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated as Confidential (Corrected) [PDF 485K]
Complaint Counsel’s Emergency Motion for Authorization to Seek Injunctive Relief to Preserve Provo
Fabrication Plant as a Going Concern Pending Completion of Administrative Litigation [PDF 26K]
ALJ's Order on Respondent's Application for Issuance of Subpoenas [PDF 35KB]
November 20, 2002
Respondents' Motion to Strike Dr. Simpson's Opinion Regarding Efficiencies [PDF 391KB]
November 14, 2002
ALJ’s Order on Nonparties' Renewed Motions for In Camera Treatment of Documents Listed on Parties' Exhibit Lists [PDF 57KB]
November 13, 2002
Motion for In Camera Treatment of Trial Testimony of David Kamrath [PDF 20KB]
November 12, 2002
Notice of Appearance Filed by Jeffrey Spigel and Kathryn Walsh of King & Spalding, Counsel for Third Party Project Technical Liaison Assocs., Inc. and Third Party's Unopposed Motion for In Camera Treatment of Designated Deposition Testimony [PDF 60KB]
Agreed Motion for In Camera Treatment of Pat Outtrim's Deposition Testimony and Agreed Order for In Camera Treatment of Pat Outtrim's Desposition Testimony [PDF 251KB]
Notice of Appearance Filed by Rhett R. Krulla, Steven L. Wilensky, Cecelia M. Waldeck, Michael A. Franchak, Lisa A. Rosenthal, and Hector R. Ruiz, Jr., Counsel Supporting the Complaint for the Federal Trade Commission [PDF 22KB]