|
Press Release 09-055
"How Professors Think"
New book explores decision making inside the guarded world of peer review
March 31, 2009
View a video interview with Harvard University sociologist Michèle Lamont.
When making decisions about which of their peers' projects deserve millions of dollars in academic research funding, reviewers often consider both the diversity and the excellence of the proposals before them. This discovery is one of many in a new book, "How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment," by Harvard University sociologist Michèle Lamont. Lamont's finding is somewhat unexpected, because diversity and excellence are often at loggerheads in academic circles. Some researchers argue that excellence must be sacrificed for diversity in certain cases, while other researchers argue the opposite. "Although racial and gender diversity are the types of diversity about which there is most debate in higher education, the kind of diversity that my panelists are most concerned with is institutional diversity and interdisciplinary diversity," said Lamont in an interview with the National Science Foundation, which supported her work. According to Lamont, decision makers generally want money to be spread across many universities and research disciplines. Her book takes readers inside the rarely-seen culture of academic peer review that asks highly-reputable experts to examine and assess the quality of researchers' work before awarding large sums of money to academic institutions throughout the United States. "I've always studied how people define worth," said Lamont describing her book. "So it was in some ways a continuation of my earlier work, but applied to a new realm of activity: academia." Organizers typically close peer review panels to outsiders, but as an experienced evaluator, Lamont gained access to several peer review panels. She was able to interview panelists before and after project review meetings, to observe some panels, and to inspect the notes of screeners in an effort to understand how funding decisions are made. Lamont suggests that one of the main contributions of her book is showing panelists how the peer review process is fair. She says there are many complexities involved in making sure participants perceive the system as equitable to all involved. "Although participants recognize the failures of the system, there are a lot of pulls and pushes that make it work" she said. "And the book provides a detailed analysis of that." The book looks at peer review in six disciplines: anthropology, economics, English literature, history, philosophy and political science. Among the topics it covers are middle of the pack and horse-trading, the power of personal and professional interests, and diversity of diversity considerations. "How Professors Think" is available from Harvard University Press.
-NSF-
Media Contacts
Bobbie Mixon, NSF (703) 292-8485 bmixon@nsf.gov
Program Contacts
Patricia E. White, NSF (703) 292-8762 pwhite@nsf.gov
Principal Investigators
Michèle Lamont, Harvard University (617) 495-8697 mlamont@wjh.harvard.edu
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering. In fiscal year (FY) 2009, its budget is $9.5 billion, which includes $3.0 billion provided through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to over 1,900 universities and institutions. Each year, NSF receives about 44,400 competitive requests for funding, and makes over 11,500 new funding awards. NSF also awards over $400 million in professional and service contracts yearly.
 Get News Updates by Email
Useful NSF Web Sites:
NSF Home Page: http://www.nsf.gov
NSF News: http://www.nsf.gov/news/
For the News Media: http://www.nsf.gov/news/newsroom.jsp
Science and Engineering Statistics: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards Searches: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
| 
