Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81* 86* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 93* 101 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 88* 93* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 87* 92* Bloomington, IN....................... 83* 85* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 93* 101 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 104* 106* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 70* 75* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 93* 88* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 84* 92* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 94* 100 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 89* 90* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 93* 94 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 92* 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 89* 97 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 90* 98 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 95* 98 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 97* 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88* 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 93* 92* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 92* 87* Great Falls, MT....................... 82* 80* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 87* 89* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 86* 95* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 104* 109* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 87* 92* Honolulu, HI.......................... 96* 105 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 88* 97 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 88* 90* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 77* 81* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 94* 90* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 87* 85* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 89* 93* Bloomington, IN....................... 85* 82* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 95* 96* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 101 107* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 81* 71* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 87* 101 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 86* 80* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 86* 94 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 92* 96* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 92* 95* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 88* 95* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83* 78* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 92* 87* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 87* 90* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 93* 100 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 96 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 85* 91* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 90* 90* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 87* 98 Great Falls, MT....................... 71* 90* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 87* 89* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 83* 91* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 101 113* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 78* 86* Honolulu, HI.......................... 93* 106* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 90* 81* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 88* 92* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 83* 80* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 88* 96* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 95 87* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 87* 89* Bloomington, IN....................... 76* 82* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 91* 88* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 97 105* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 63* 70* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 93* 90* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 89* 85* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 103 93* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 84* 88* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 90* 92* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 96 90* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80* 79* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 92 90* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 89* 84* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 96 93* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 90 95* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86* 84* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 93* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 96 89* Great Falls, MT....................... 83* 75* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 79* 87* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 80* 85* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 98 103 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 83* 87* Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 87* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 87* 89* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 93 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 62* 75* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 69* 89* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 66* 93* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 65* 84* Bloomington, IN....................... 58* 72* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 81* 83* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 95 102 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 50* 76* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 87* 94* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 59* 73* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 68* 88* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 69* 88* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 78* 91* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 75* 90* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 71* 70* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 68* 86* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 77* 89* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 70* 96 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 77* 87* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 87* 79* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 79* 93* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 90* 88* Great Falls, MT....................... 84* 83* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 67* 82* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 60* 75* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 88 99 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 78* 79* Honolulu, HI.......................... 88* 95 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 68* 82* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 68* 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 87* 87* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 100 101 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 91* 87* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 84* 90* Bloomington, IN....................... 93* 100 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 104* 99 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 104 106* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 73* 71* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 103 97 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 97 97 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 97 94* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 96 94* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 99 100 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 92* 93* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88* 81* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 87* 93* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 101 97 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 95 98 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 112* 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 92* 94* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95* 104 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 96 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 95* 91* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 97 97 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 101 88* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 107* 102 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 96* 96 Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 95 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 97 89* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 97 90* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 88* 77* Iowa City, IA......................... 90* 100 Johnstown, PA......................... 79* 77* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91* 89* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 95* 94 Knoxville, TN......................... 85* 101 Lincoln, NE........................... 81* 82* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 99 105 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 87* 88* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 87* 94* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 90* 101 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 93* 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 100 108 Mobile, AL............................ 82* 76* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 90* 88* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 106* 112* Ocala, FL............................. 83* 78* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 83* 84* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 84* 89 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 87* 84* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 97* 104 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 90* 100 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 89* 92* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 96* 98 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 101 104 Reading, PA........................... 94* 108* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 89* 93* Richmond, VA.......................... 90* 96 Rochester, NY......................... 90* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 90* 88* Iowa City, IA......................... 85* 94* Johnstown, PA......................... 79* 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91* 91* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 89* 107* Knoxville, TN......................... 92 78* Lincoln, NE........................... 79* 86* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 99 103 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 85* 97* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 82* 82* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 90* 94* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 89* 94* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 97 109* Mobile, AL............................ 76* 81* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 93* 89* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 108* 108* Ocala, FL............................. 76* 87* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 82* 85* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 79* 89* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 80* 94 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 98 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 94 93* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 88* 90* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 90* 105 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 104 108* Reading, PA........................... 85* 94* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 88* 92* Richmond, VA.......................... 88* 91* Rochester, NY......................... 89* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 86* 88* Iowa City, IA......................... 86* 89* Johnstown, PA......................... 79* 77* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92 90* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 93* 91* Knoxville, TN......................... 91* 86* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 80* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 104 97 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 91* 87* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 92* 89* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 88* 89* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 96 94* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 100 95* Mobile, AL............................ 87* 84* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 93* 90* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 106 105* Ocala, FL............................. 85* 83* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81* 81* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 92 80* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 88* 80* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 90* 97* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 97 90* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 83* 89* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 104 96 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 93* 97* Reading, PA........................... 97 92* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 96 88* Richmond, VA.......................... 87* 92* Rochester, NY......................... 89* 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 73* 85* Iowa City, IA......................... 79* 91* Johnstown, PA......................... 73* 79* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 78* 88* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 83* 85* Knoxville, TN......................... 62* 76* Lincoln, NE........................... 64* 84* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 85* 98 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 81* 82* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 71* 89* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 71* 85* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 83* 91* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 85* 93 Mobile, AL............................ 70* 88* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 71* 83* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 101 102 Ocala, FL............................. 61* 95* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 78* 95 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 69* 81* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 70* 92* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 81* 100 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 63* 92 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 74* 86* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 88* 99 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 86* 99 Reading, PA........................... 78* 96 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 72* 97 Richmond, VA.......................... 70* 90* Rochester, NY......................... 75* 78* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 101 92* Iowa City, IA......................... 96* 93* Johnstown, PA......................... 81* 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 101 92* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 93* 99 Knoxville, TN......................... 84* 91* Lincoln, NE........................... 85* 88* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 96 99 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 95* 87* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 93* 91* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 91* 96 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 99 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 110* 102 Mobile, AL............................ 89* 96 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 96 99 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 102 105 Ocala, FL............................. 88* 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 82* 79* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 82* 102 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 102 101 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 95 99 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 93* 95 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 94* 91* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 96 94* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 106* 100 Reading, PA........................... 97 94* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 93* 93* Richmond, VA.......................... 97 95* Rochester, NY......................... 95* 94* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Rockford, IL.......................... 91* 87* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 99 101 Salinas, CA........................... 105* 112* San Antonio, TX....................... 84* 91* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 101 105 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 110* 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 102 100 Springfield, MA....................... 101 99 Springfield, MO....................... 81* 82* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94* 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87* 88* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84* 84* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 91* 104 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 100 102 York-Hanover, PA...................... 90* 103 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 88* 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Rockford, IL.......................... 90* 92* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 102 105* Salinas, CA........................... 111* 111* San Antonio, TX....................... 86* 82* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 102 108* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 110* 117* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 95* 111* Springfield, MA....................... 104 100 Springfield, MO....................... 81* 81* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93* 91* Tallahassee, FL....................... 79* 90* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 84* 88* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84* 88* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 96 95* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 103 99 York-Hanover, PA...................... 92* 92* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 87* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Rockford, IL.......................... 90* 87* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 96 96* Salinas, CA........................... 118* 103 San Antonio, TX....................... 88* 83* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 96 97 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 113* 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 104 96* Springfield, MA....................... 101 101 Springfield, MO....................... 84* 79* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 88* 91* Tallahassee, FL....................... 84* 83* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 88* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85* 84* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 90* 89* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 98 102 York-Hanover, PA...................... 83* 88* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 79* 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Rockford, IL.......................... 82* 88* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 77* 103 Salinas, CA........................... 96 95 San Antonio, TX....................... 74* 91* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 85* 97 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 94 102 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 84* 95 Springfield, MA....................... 83* 92 Springfield, MO....................... 59* 78* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 92* 98 Tallahassee, FL....................... 62* 78* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 74* 84* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 64* 84* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 67* 80* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 76* 102 York-Hanover, PA...................... 76* 88* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 72* 84* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Rockford, IL.......................... 98 97 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 109* 103 Salinas, CA........................... 97 99 San Antonio, TX....................... 93* 84* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 101 96 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 103 103 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 112* 106* Springfield, MA....................... 104* 107* Springfield, MO....................... 89* 93* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 101 105 Tallahassee, FL....................... 89* 88* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89* 97 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 88* 85* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 99 89* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 102 101 York-Hanover, PA...................... 92* 99 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 97 105 * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.