|
Guidelines
for the AHR
Article
Submissions
Book
Reviewing
Style
Sheet for Article Authors
Guidelines
for Submitting Manuscripts to the AHR
Manuscripts may be
sent to the Editor, American Historical Review, 914 Atwater,
Bloomington, Indiana 47401. Submissions by mail sent from
the North American continent should include four copies of the
complete text and two copies if from abroad. Submissions by
attachment are our preference. Our e-mail address is ahr@indiana.edu.
Especially helpful are word-processed files supported by WIN2000
or NT and in Microsoft Word. (If you use another program, we can
probably convert it. To check if your file is compatible, contact
our Production Manager
at 812-855-7609.) All texts, whether paper or electronic, should
be double-spaced with generous margins, including quotations and
footnotes. Footnotes should be numbered consecutively throughout
and should appear in a separate section at the end of the text.
The editors prefer to work with manuscripts that are no more than
8,000 words in length, not counting notes, tables, and charts.
The editors appreciate full addresses, including e-mail, in all
correspondence.
No manuscripts will
be considered for publication if it is concurrently under consideration
by another journal or press or if it has been published or is
soon to be published elsewhere. Both restrictions apply to the
substance as well as to the exact wording of the manuscript. If
the manuscript is accepted, the editors expect that its appearance
in the Review will precede republication of the essay,
or any significant part thereof, in another work.
Other guidelines for
the preparation of manuscripts for submission to and publication
in the AHR can be found in the style
sheet. Articles will be edited to conform to AHR style
in matters of punctuation, capitalization, and the like. The editors
may suggest other changes in the interest of clarity and economy
of expression; such changes are not made without consultation
with authors. The editors are the final arbiters of length, grammar,
and usage.
Submitting Articles
to the AHR
The editors
of the AHR, like editors of other historical journals,
seek articles that are new in content and interpretation and make
a fresh contribution to historical knowledge. Our principal consideration
in determining whether an article should be published is its appropriateness
to the distinctive audience of the AHR. Because our readers
embrace all fields of history and are located throughout the world,
the AHR has a responsibility to publish essays that reach
beyond the specialties that have enlivened yet also fragmented
the discipline in recent years. Consequently, the editors seek
manuscripts that can engage the common interests of as many historians
as possible.
We realize that
the historical scholarship likely to interest a large and diverse
readership can be written in many ways. The editors try to identify
those essays that demonstrate an author's command of a specific
subject. They should also have the potential to communicate its
implications to scholars working in other fields. Manuscripts
that have an appeal outside their particular specialty may well
have a very specific subject matter. Or they may effectively demonstrate
a methodology that other scholars might find useful even though
the subject matter of the essay itself is not directly in their
field. Manuscripts likely to engage common concerns may also be
explicit discussions of historical methodology or review essays
that analyze current trends in particular fields of historical
inquiry.
Given our mandate
to engage the interests of the entire discipline, we also seek
an array of articles that collectively addresses the spatial,
temporal, and thematic dimensions of contemporary historical inquiry.
Over the century since its creation, the AHR has published
essays primarily on the history of the United States and Western
Europe because these articles form the bulk of our submissions.
Although we welcome such manuscripts, the editors have also actively
encouraged, and continue to encourage, the submission of manuscripts
on Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. We now also
renew our commitment to understanding the past broadly not just
in terms of geography but also in terms of time and periods. In
an era when academic and popular conceptions of history seem to
be more and more presentist and most manuscripts sent to the AHR
examine the modern world, we invite the submission of manuscripts
in ancient, medieval, and early modern history. Thematically,
an earlier concentration on political history has been broadened
in the AHR (as elsewhere in the discipline) with a diverse
array of topics. Over the last ten years, intellectual history
and historiography have obtained a more prominent place in our
pages, as have women's history and the history of race relations
in America and the modern world. The editors hope that work on
these topics will continue to be submitted, as well as essays
that extend these inquiries into topics such as cultural history,
gender history, and the history of ethnicity.
As we strive
to fulfill our mandate to a diverse readership with a balanced
presentation of fields and subjects, the editors construct the
article section by applying these standards to the approximately
250 manuscripts that are submitted to the AHR each year.
The vast majority of these essays are unsolicited, but we do on
occasion commission articles on particular topics as well as review
essays and commentaries for AHR Forums. We are able to
publish approximately one tenth of the manuscripts we receive.
These articles are selected through a rigorous review process.
Every manuscript is evaluated by the AHR staff. Those with
the greatest promise are sent to members of the AHR Board
of Editors for further review. Upon recommendation by board members,
essays are then sent to specialists for a final, anonymous review.
All reviews are designed not only to evaluate the manuscript's
suitability for publication in the AHR but also to help
authors clarify their argument and explain its broader implications.
Approximately one third of the manuscripts experience this entire
evaluation process. Those that we select to publish then often
undergo a final round of revision and reevaluation. As a consequence
of our evaluation methods, every article published in the AHR
has been reviewed by at least six scholars, and often more. However,
the editors are committed to a timely reviewing process. We do
not maintain a lengthy backlog of articles, and we try to reach
a decision about each manuscript within six months of its submission.
Though the process is rigorous, most authors are pleased with
the results of these procedures, and many of their articles later
win prizes.
As a final guide
to publishing articles in the AHR, the editors would like
to repeat the advice our predecessors printed on these pages twenty-five
years ago: "The AHR does not stand at the top of a pyramid
of scholarly prestige, automatically to be tried first by an ambitious
author before he moves on to a 'lesser' journal. Rather, the AHR,
with certain other general periodicals, has another purpose than
the specialized journals, defined--in both a limiting and a liberating
sense--by its readership. It is concerned with large, persistent
themes and genuine, broadly interesting innovation; it is a vehicle
for general scholarly communication or for specialized studies
that transcend the normal boundaries or expectations of their
fields. It therefore stands as testimony, however fragmented and
isolated the various fields of history sometimes seem, to the
essential unity of the profession."
R. K. Webb,
et al., "Articles for the AHR: An Editorial," AHR,
75 (October 1970): 1580.
© American
Historical Association
Go
to Style Sheet
Return
to top of page
Updated
10/02/06
|
|
|