USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

Land Use, Value, and Management: Major Uses of Land

Contents
 

The United States has a land area of about 2.3 billion acres, which can be categorized as:

  • Rural (2.2 billion acres, or 97 percent) includes agricultural (range, cropland, pasture, farmsteads, and roads), forest, and other land.
  • Urban (60 million acres; 3 percent) includes residential, commercial, utilities, mixed, transitional, and other urban land.

Major uses of land in 2002 were:

  • Cropland, 442 million acres (20 percent of the land area)
  • Grassland pasture and range, 587 million acres (26 percent)
  • Forest-use land (total forest land exclusive of forested areas in parks and other special uses), 651 million acres (19 percent)
  • Special uses (parks, wilderness, wildlife, and related uses), 297 million acres (13 percent)
  • Urban land, 60 million acres (3 percent)
  • Miscellaneous other land (deserts, wetlands, and barren land), 228 million acres (10 percent).

These proportions vary greatly from region to region due to differences in climate, geography, and population levels. For example, the Northeast has 12 percent of its area in cropland, compared with 58 percent in the Corn Belt. However, nearly 60 percent of the Northeast is in forest compared with only 2 percent in the Northern Plains.

National and regional proportions are also skewed by the land area of Alaska, which has very little cropland and pasture but large areas of forest-use, special-use, and miscellaneous other land.

Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002

 

Changes in Major Uses

Major land uses have changed little, in percentage terms, between 1997 and 2002, for the 48 contiguous States. Because Alaska and Hawaii have very little crop area, the discussion in this section focuses on the contiguous 48 States.

The largest acreage change from 1997 to 2002 was a 13-million-acre decrease in cropland (-3 percent). This continues a long downward trend from 1978, when cropland totaled 470 million acres, an overall 6-percent drop. Total cropland area in 2002 was at 442 million acres, its lowest point since in 1945, but only 2 million acres (less than 1 percent) below the previous low in 1964. Cropland has been relatively constant from 1945 to 1997, ranging between 442 and 471 million acres and averaging about 463 million acres.

While land defined as forest use has been on a declining trend from 612 million acres in 1964, forest-use lands increased from 552 to 559 million acres between 1997 and 2002. Forest-use land excludes forested areas in special uses, estimated at 98 million acres in 2002.

Estimated acreage of grassland pasture and range increased by over 6 million acres (1 percent) between 1997 and 2002. However, total land used for grazing (the combined acreage of cropland pasture, grassland pasture and range, and grazed forests) decreased from 786 to 780 million acres during 1997-2002, continuing a steady downward trend since the 1940s.

Miscellaneous uses—marshes, swamps, bare rock areas, deserts, and transitional areas—decreased 6 million acres (-6 percent). This is a residual category that includes land not in any of the other major land use categories. The decline in miscellaneous use areas from 1997 to 2002 may have been due to a reclassification of these lands as "special use" areas, which increased by 11 million acres (8 percent) from 1997 to 2002.

The parks and wildlife component of special uses increased 5 million acres (5 percent) from 1997 to 2002. The remaining change was the result of an estimated 2-million acre increase in rural transportation areas and a 4-million acre increase in farmsteads/farm roads. These changes reflect, at least in part, the availability of new data and the use of improved estimation methods in 2002 rather than an actual change in acreage over 1997-2002.

Urban area is estimated at 60 million acres in 2002, compared to an estimated 66 million acres in 1997. This decline in the estimates is due to changes in the way urban land area is measured and provides little information on changes in urbanized area from 1997 to 2002. Rural residential land, a new land use category introduced in 1997, was estimated to be about 94 million acres in 2002, up from the 1997 estimate of 83 million acres.

Factors Contributing to Land Use Change

Several economic, demographic, technological, and policy factors influence land use dynamics. According to land rent theory, allocation among competing uses on a fixed land base is determined by the associated land rents, which vary according to land quality and location. Land is allocated to the use with the highest return. As relative rents change over time, land use would shift between uses.

For example, land has shifted into crop production from other uses in response to rising commodity prices. However, land-use changes are gradual due to conversion costs.

Between 1945 and 2000, the U.S. population doubled from 133 million to 281 million people. In 2000, there were 106 million households, a quarter of which were one-person households. More land was converted to urban uses, especially for homes. New residential uses also require land for schools, office buildings, shopping sites, and other commercial and industrial uses. The amount of land converted to urban use rose steadily from 15 million acres in 1945 to an estimated 60 million acres in 2002. These increases came mostly from pasture, range, and forest land.

Technology has also affected land use and regional land-use shifts, especially in cropland. The rapid adoption of new technology, improved crop varieties, improved insect and disease control, and other changes have boosted agricultural productivity so that more production can be obtained from the same cropland base. Agricultural productivity has more than doubled over the past 50 years.

Larger farm equipment and increased use of irrigation has favored regions with large, level fields. Thus, crop production declined in the Northeast, Appalachian, and Southeast regions. Changes in use of land for high-value crops, especially vegetables, is particularly evident in the developing fringes of major metropolitan areas.

Urbanized area accounted for only 2.6 percent of the U.S. land base in 2002. Nevertheless, urban influence affected about 17 percent of the Nation's agricultural land in 1997. Farms near urban areas realize higher land values, giving farmers an incentive to sell farmland for nonfarm development. Local, State, and Federal governments have increased their efforts toward preserving agricultural lands and their associated rural amenities.

Federal agricultural commodity and conservation policies and State and local land-use programs have influenced land use both within agriculture and between agriculture and other uses. For example, while commodity programs, such as income support programs and acreage set-aside, helped to sustain or increase cropland acreage, at its peak in 1992-95, the Conservation Reserve Program took about 36 million acres of land out of crop production.

The 1996 Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act ended authority for annual acreage reduction programs and decoupled income support payments from land-use decisions, allowing producers to change land use without jeopardizing program payments. The 2002 Farm Act updated crop acreage bases to the 1998-2001 period.

Trends in the use of U.S. Cropland

Cropland used for crops consists of:

  • Crop failure
  • Summer fallow
  • Cropland harvested

Crop Failure

Cropland failure increased sharply in 2002.

  • Cropland failure, 15 million acres, was the largest since 1956.
  • Drought in the Great Plains States was the major cause.

All the Plains states had significant acreages of crop failure. Texas reached a high of 2.6 million acres (11 percent of planted acres). Colorado had the highest percent failure rate-16 percent if planted acres. North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico also had high crop failure rates.

High crop failure rates in 2002 were not limited to the Great Plains States. In the southeast, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama also had high failure rates, ranging from 6.5 to 11.4 percent.

The U.S. national average was 4.4 percent, higher than many states, but much lower than the Plains states. The 2002 failed acreage of 15 million acres, while high, pales in comparison to the 1930's Great Depression years. In 1934, during drought and Dust Bowl conditions, 64 million acres of planted cropland failed.

Summer Fallow

The use of summer fallow as a moisture-conserving crop production practice continues to decline. Summer fallow reached a high of 41 million acres in 1969 and has since declined to 19 million acres in 2002. The decline is partly attributed to the adoption of other moisture-conserving soil conservation practices, such as no-till and mulch-till, which have reduced the need for summer fallow.

Some of the decrease in summer fallow may also be attributable to the Conservation Reserve Program. Much of the CRP is in the Great Plains where summer fallow is most commonly practiced. Land taken out production and placed in the CRP includes some land that might otherwise have been in summer fallow.

Harvested Cropland

Cropland has remained relatively stable over the past 10 years. The biggest change has been a decrease in cropland idled by Federal programs.

Together, harvested cropland, crop failure, and summer fallow accounted for 340 million acres of cropland used for crops in 2002, unchanged from 2001. This is down 1 million acres from the 1993-2000 average of 341 million acres.

Cropland used for crops increased dramatically in 1996, the year the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act took effect. Under the FAIR Act, land previously set aside in Federal acreage reduction programs became available for crops. Since 1997, however, cropland used for crops has gradually decreased from a high of 349 million acres to 340 million acres, primarily due to low commodity prices.

The decrease in cropland used for crops reflects lower harvested acres of wheat and, to a lesser degree, sorghum, barley, oats, and cotton. Wheat acreage declined 17 million acres from 1996 to 2002. Cropland idled in Federal programs has decreased about 21 million acres since 1995 with the elimination of annual commodity programs and changes to the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP).

Harvested cropland fluctuated from a low of 297 million acres in 1993 to a high of 321 million acres in 1997 and declined to 307 million acres in 2002.

Most cropland used for crops is harvested, but typically 2-4 percent experiences crop failure and 5-8 percent is cultivated as summer fallow to build moisture for the following year. In 2002, farmers harvested one or more crops on an estimated 307 million acres of cropland, down 4 million acres from 2001. This was largely a result of reduced hay, wheat, sorghum, rice, and cotton acres. About 10 million acres of the total acres harvested were double-cropped. When double-cropped land is counted twice, harvested land increases to over 317 million acres. Four crops—corn for grain, soybeans, wheat, and hay—account for 80.2 percent of all crop acres harvested in 2002. An additional 15 principal crops accounted for another 15.2 percent of harvested area. Vegetables, fruits, nuts, and all other crops accounted for the remaining 4.7 percent of crop area harvested in 2002.

In 2002, harvested acreage of corn, hay, dry beans, sugar beets, and oats increased. The acreage of sorghum, barley, wheat, soybeans, cotton, and rice decreased. The decrease in harvested wheat acreage, most of it in the Great Plains, was largely responsible for the overall decline in harvested cropland.

  • Harvested wheat acreage in 2002 was the lowest since 1970. This was probably due to several factors, including low wheat prices, more profitable alternative crops, and the success of the CRP taking acreage out of production.
  • Soybean acreage harvested in 2002 was down slightly after reaching an all-time high in the United States of 73 million acres in 2001.
  • Corn acreage increased from the 1960s to the early 1980s, decreased for a few years, and trended upward again in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Corn acreage was up about 1 percent from 2001 to 2002.
  • Sorghum and barley fluctuated year to year until the mid-1980s, when they increased to 30-year highs. Both crops have declined since 1986.
  • Harvested rice acreage in 2002 decreased about 3 percent from 2001.
  • The 2002 peanut acreage is the lowest it has been since 1982.
  • Rye acreage has declined fairly consistently over the last 50 years.
  • Sunflower production increased until the early 1980s, declined for a few years, and increased again in the 1990s. Acreage has trended downward again from 2000 to 2002.
  • Oats have trended down over the last 30 years, while acreage of all hay has changed very little.
  • Harvested acreage of cotton hit a low of less than 8 million acres in 1983 and has since trended up toward the higher levels of the late 1970s.
  • Tobacco has trended downward over the last 50 years.
  • Lower demand for cooking oils has led to decreased production of special oilseed crops. Special oilseeds include canola, safflower, and sunflower seed. Special oilseed crops decreased from 4.6 million acres in 1996 to 3.7 million acres in 2002.
  • Several other principal crops—dry edible beans and peas, potatoes, and sugar beets—occupy a comparatively small acreage and have exhibited no major trends.
  • Federal commodity programs, until 1996, promoted the production of industrial and other crops by allowing these crops to be planted on acreage diversion program lands. The crops allowed in 1995 included castor beans, chia, crambe, crotalaria, cuphea, guar, guayule, hesperaloe, kenaf, lesquerella, meadowfoam, milkweed, plantago ovato, and sesame. Deficiency payments were not reduced when these crops were planted on diverted acreage.

 

For more information, contact: Michael Brady

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: October 18, 2005