- Info
Director's Statement on the Taping of Early Detainee Interrogations
Statement to Employees by Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,
General Mike Hayden on the Taping of Early
Detainee Interrogations
December 6, 2007
The press has learned that back in 2002, during the initial
stage of our terrorist detention program, CIA videotaped interrogations, and
destroyed the tapes in 2005. I understand that the Agency did so only after it
was determined they were no longer of intelligence value and not relevant to
any internal, legislative, or judicial inquiries—including the trial of
Zacarias Moussaoui. The decision to destroy the tapes was made within CIA itself.
The leaders of our oversight committees in Congress were informed of the videos
years ago and of the Agency’s intention to dispose of the material. Our
oversight committees also have been told that the videos were, in fact,
destroyed.
If past public commentary on the Agency’s detention program
is any guide, we may see misinterpretations of the facts in the days ahead. With
that in mind, I want you to have some background now.
CIA’s terrorist detention and interrogation program began
after the capture of Abu Zubaydah in March 2002. Zubaydah, who had extensive
knowledge of al-Qa’ida personnel and operations, had been seriously wounded in
a firefight. When President Bush officially acknowledged in September 2006 the
existence of CIA’s counter-terror initiative, he talked about Zubaydah, noting
that this terrorist survived solely because of medical treatment arranged by CIA.
Under normal questioning, Zubaydah became defiant and evasive. It was clear, in
the President’s words, that “Zubaydah had more information that could save
innocent lives, but he stopped talking.”
That made imperative the use of other means to obtain the
information—means that were lawful, safe, and effective. To meet that need, CIA
designed specific, appropriate interrogation procedures. Before they were used,
they were reviewed and approved by the Department of Justice and by other
elements of the Executive Branch. Even with the great care taken and detailed
preparations made, the fact remains that this effort was new, and the Agency
was determined that it proceed in accord with established legal and policy
guidelines. So, on its own, CIA began to videotape interrogations.
The tapes were meant chiefly as an additional, internal
check on the program in its early stages. At one point, it was thought the
tapes could serve as a backstop to guarantee that other methods of documenting
the interrogations—and the crucial information they produced—were accurate and
complete. The Agency soon determined that its documentary reporting was full
and exacting, removing any need for tapes. Indeed, videotaping stopped in 2002.
As part of the rigorous review that has defined the
detention program, the Office of General Counsel examined the tapes and
determined that they showed lawful methods of questioning. The Office of
Inspector General also examined the tapes in 2003 as part of its look at the
Agency’s detention and interrogation practices. Beyond their lack of
intelligence value—as the interrogation sessions had already been exhaustively
detailed in written channels—and the absence of any legal or internal reason to
keep them, the tapes posed a serious security risk. Were they ever to leak,
they would permit identification of your CIA colleagues who had served in the
program, exposing them and their families to retaliation from al-Qa’ida and its
sympathizers.
These decisions were made years ago. But it is my
responsibility, as Director today, to explain to you what was done, and why. What
matters here is that it was done in line with the law. Over the course of its
life, the Agency’s interrogation program has been of great value to our
country. It has helped disrupt terrorist operations and save lives. It was
built on a solid foundation of legal review. It has been conducted with careful
supervision. If the story of these tapes is told fairly, it will underscore
those facts.
Mike Hayden
Historical Document
Posted: Dec 07, 2007 09:12 AM
Last Updated: Jun 18, 2008 09:00 AM
Last Reviewed: Dec 07, 2007 09:12 AM