![2002 Farm Bill logo](farmbill_logo.gif) |
Implementing Information and Instructions: Food
Stamp High Performance Bonuses |
Subject: Implementing Information and Instructions:
Food Stamp High Performance Bonuses
To:
Regional Administrators / All Regions
On May 13, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-171). Section 4120 of this Act
authorized $48 million each fiscal year to be awarded to States with high
or improved performance in the administration of the Food Stamp Program
(FSP). The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) is authorized to set the criteria
for the performance measures in guidance for fiscal years (FY) 2003 and
2004. We will publish a regulation codifying the performance measures
for FY 2005 and beyond.
FNS has met with representatives of State agencies and advocate groups
to get their input on what the performance measures should be and how
the money should be divided among the measures. We recognize that there
are many ways of doing this; but believe the following structure strikes
a good balance between payment accuracy and access, as well as recognizing
both improvement and high performance. We believe it reflects FSP values,
rewards a sufficient number of States, and uses data that is available
and timely.
Performance Measures for FY 2003 High Performance Bonuses
Payment Accuracy
- $24 million total
- Divided among the 7 States with the lowest and the 3 States with the
most improved combined payment error rate
- Measured by quality control (QC) data.
Negative Error Rate
- $6 million total
- Divided among the 4 States with the lowest and the 2 States with the
most improved negative error rate
- Measured by QC data.
Participation Rate
- $12 million total
- Divided among the 4 States with the highest and the 4 States with
the most improved participation rate
- We are planning on using census data. The numerator will be the average
monthly State participation as reported to FNS. The denominator will
be the number of people below the poverty line in each State. We recognize
that this data yields a less precise measure of the participation rate
than we would prefer. However, data that we normally use to determine
participation rates is not available until after we are required to
award the bonuses. The statute requires the bonuses to be awarded the
year following the performance year.
Application Processing Timeliness
- $6 million total
- Divided among the 6 States with the highest percentage of timely
processed applications
- We are planning on using QC data. This measure will be based on new
applications certified during the measurement year. The effort and difficulty
of determining whether a late determination was client caused or State
caused is too problematic. Therefore, new applications that are processed
outside the Federal-processing standards will be considered untimely
for this measure, even though some may have met the regulatory timeliness
standard.
As noted above, these measures are for FY 2003 only. The measures for
FY 2004, which will be announced prior to the beginning of next fiscal
year, may be different. We will be publishing a rulemaking in the coming
year proposing the performance measures for FY 2005 and beyond. While
we have had many discussions with our stakeholders to this point concerning
performance measures, we would be happy to entertain your comments and
suggestions about ways to improve the bonus system for FY 2004 and beyond.
We are very pleased to have this opportunity to award States for high
and improved performance, and believe that the bonuses advance our goals
for both improving and balancing program access and integrity. In the
event you have any questions, or need more information, you may contact
John Knaus at 305- 2098, or Moira Johnston at 703-305-2515.
Please notify your States of the above criteria as soon as possible
and share a copy of your notification letter with us.
Kate Coler
Deputy Administrator
Food Stamp Program
Last
modified:
11/21/2008
|