Future Research at
Fort Pulaski
Future archeological research at Fort Pulaski National
Monument will more than likely occur in conjunction with Archeological
Resources Protection Act issues. Any improvements
or additions must be reviewed to ensure that no cultural resources are
impacted before in-depth investigations can occur. Other research may
include the shovel-testing of the entire monument in order to determine
the locations and distributions of prehistoric sites, pre-Fort Pulaski
historic sites, Fort Pulaski construction sites and Civil War related
sites, and post-Civil War sites. A more complete picture of the occupation
of Cockspur Island and the surrounding area can be painted with a better
understanding of the number and location of each of these site types.
Lou Groh of the Southeast Archeological Center is one archeologist
who has done a great deal of work at Fort Pulaski. She provides an outline
of future research needs in Chapter 7 of her 2000 report entitled, Fort
Pulaski National Monument: Archeological Overview and Assessment.
These are outlined below with further emphasis provided as necessary.
Before
Fort Pulaski
Archeological surveys conducted for the purpose of finding
prehistoric sites should be done by both water and air to identify Archaic
shell middens. If any possible sites are identified, they should then
be mapped and tested in order to determine their extent and place in
time. The marshy areas around Cockspur Island and McQueens Island should
also be investigated, especially since wet environments tend to preserve
archeological remains better than the dry acidic soils of the islands.
Dry areas should also be tested, keeping in mind that prehistoric sites
may be located underneath historic sites.
Historic sites such as Fort George, Fort Greene, and the
Lyford Pilot House are best located through archeological testing, although
the utilization of satellite imaging and/or aerial photography may also
provide a useful means of identifying site boundaries. In addition,
the use of remote sensing technology such as Ground Penetrating Radar
may provide a relatively inexpensive means of locating the sites of
these various structures. The search for these particular sites should
be focused on the 20 acres located in the southeastern area of Cockspur
Island. Other pre-Fort Pulaski sites might also be identified during
the testing used to locate prehistoric sites at the park.
Fort
Construction and the Civil War
Most of the information related to the archeology of Fort
Pulaski National Monument concerns the period of the construction of
Fort Pulaski and Fort Pulaski's role in the Civil War. More evidence
of both of these occupations would be exposed during the same park wide
archeological testing proposed in the above section. Further in-depth
investigations should focus on identifying the boundaries of related
sites, construction methods and materials, structure function, and how
these structures are related to one another. "The resulting data
recovered would also aid in evaluating the national, state, and local
significance of archeological resources associated with the Civil War
era at Fort Pulaski National Monument" (page 97 of Groh's 2000
report).
More
specifically, the area of the monument that holds the greatest potential
for future research is the construction village. This area was occupied
continuously for almost 20 years, and was home to a diverse contingent
of laborers, both free and enslaved. The significance of the construction
village, or workmen's village, was recognized in 1972 when a nomination
to the National Register of Historic Places was accepted (For more information
on the criteria used for determining significance, see the next section).
The listing is subdivided into two areas, with one referring to the
workmen's village (HS-02B) and the other referring to the associated
cisterns (HS-02A) (Click here for an 1831 Map
of the Workmen's Village). There
were 23 buildings associated with the workmen's village, including various
types of housing for the workers, a bakehouse, multiple kitchens, a
stable, and a blacksmith shop (Click here for an 1842
Sketch of the Laborers Quarters Layout). The only remains of these
23 buildings still visible are the 7 circular brick structures and 2
brick rubble areas (also referred to as square brickworks). As was stated
in the Archeology
Related to the Construction section, the only work that has occurred
in the workmen's village was a few shovel tests placed around these
brickworks.
Another means by which the various foundations of the
construction village could be identified is through the use of Ground
Penetrating Radar (Click here for More
Information on Ground Penetrating Radar). This may hold the key
to identifying many of these structural remains without going through
the expensive process of excavating the entire site. Basically, this
method would provide a non-intrusive method of locating and mapping
these remaining structures and disturbances. Its usefulness, however,
depends on its ability to identify changes in soil composition and the
presence of structural remains in soils that may not be very conducive
to remote sensing studies. As evidenced by the 1994 remote sensing investigations
that occurred in the area of the graveyard, the soils of Cockspur Island
make non-intrusive subsurface investigations difficult to say the least.
This will be especially true in the northern section of the construction
village area that is buried under 6 feet of dredge spoil from the Savannah
River and is overgrown by a tangled mass of trees and other vegetation.
The investigation of the construction village will be a difficult undertaking
no matter what methods are employed.
One
section of the workmen's village that has yet to be located is that
of the workmen's cemetery. While this area could possibly provide a
great deal of information related to the lives and deaths of the workers,
the location and investigation of it has proven to be a difficult matter.
It was speculated that the cemetery could be in the same location as
the Fort Pulaski cemetery, but based on archeological investigations
there, this hypothesis was discounted. More likely is the possibility
that the location of the workmen's cemetery is north of the Pulaski
cemetery at the location of the visitor's parking lot. It is possible
that the construction of this parking lot either destroyed or covered
the remains of those who died while building the fort. If the cemetery
was not destroyed, it will stay well protected until future research
is conducted there. It is also possible that the workmen's cemetery
is located in an entirely different area of Cockspur Island altogether.
The importance in learning more from the construction
village lies in its ability to yield vast amounts of information about
the nature of labor during the first half of the 19th century. The years
from 1829 to 1847 were a time of relative stability in the southeast
United States, and were still heavily entrenched in the status quo of
the day evidenced by an immense dependence on slave labor. This dynamic
between free European-American and enslaved African-American laborers
is one issue that has not been well-documented in archival and historical
studies. Archeology can provide a means of eliciting a less-biased perspective
on this period in American history. Through the study of the dwellings
in which the various groups lived, the orientation of these dwellings,
and the nature of the workmen's cemetery, a great deal more information
will be made available both for a professional and public audience.
Archeology
of the Post Civil War Era
Future investigations of the sites that postdate the Civil
War should focus on changes in land use over time and the lives of those
who occupied the area. Work should be conducted in the Hunter/Pulaski
Crash Boat Dock Annex, the U.S. Navy refuse area, and the area of the
US Quarantine Station. The first two have the potential of better illustrating
the lives of the soldiers stationed on Cockspur Island before and during
World War II. Archeology in the area of the US Quarantine Station could
yield a better understanding of treatment of disease during the early
20th century, with a specific focus on types of diseases treated, the
procedures used to treat them, and the evolution of medical technology.
The refuse area was used by the Army Air Corps until 1936
and by the naval contingent stationed there from 1941-1946. There is
the possibility that it was also used by both the Civilian Conservation
Corp and by the U.S. Quarantine Station. This dump site would therefore
provide investigators with a great deal of information concerning these
periods of Cockspur Island's history.
Another important fact to note is that sites 50 years
or older (at the time of this writing, dating to 1951 and earlier) such
as those related to World War II occupations, are eligible for nomination
to the National Register of Historic Places (Click here to learn more
about the National
Register of Historic Places). The evaluation of a site's eligibility
for the National Register is directly related to that site's significance
in the history of a particular region. A district, site, building, structure,
or object must meet one of the four criteria below to be eligible for
the National Register. They must "possess integrity of location,
design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and
These criteria, despite their vagueness, provide the backbone for the
nomination of sites to the National Register. Some of the buildings from
both the West End Naval Complex and the U.S. Quarantine Station were not
destroyed by their respective governing agencies, and therefore remain
eligible for nomination (Click here for a 1945
Map Showing Retained Buildings and Removed Buildings - 71 KB). Using
the concepts of site significance and site integrity, evaluations of other
areas such as Hunter/Pulaski Crash Boat Dock Annex, the U.S. Navy refuse
area, and the area of the U.S. Quarantine Station may provide Fort Pulaski
National Monument with more listings on the National Register of Historic
Places making them eligible for further protection under Federal law.