publications >
open file report >
OFR-97-453
U.S. Department of the Interior
Environmental Quality and Preservation - Fragile Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys: Preserving the Largest Reef Ecosystem in the Continental U.S.
Any loss of this economically viable and physically essential ecosystem would have a significant, potentially very dangerous economic, health, and safety impact on the densely populated Florida Keys and South Florida mainland.
To understand this equilibrium and to develop the essential tools needed for modern ecosystem management and preservation, one must first understand the basic natural linkage among the porous limestone underpinning, location and thickness of the overlying sediment, and the resulting presence or absence of biologic and ecologic habitats. The purpose is to supply accurate fundamental scientific information to educate and guide managers, regulators, commercial industries, and the visiting public in evaluating management alternatives and making informed and sound decisions. The scientific information includes knowledge of how and why the reef resources developed as they did and exist where they do today, how and why each is an integral part of the ecosystem and must be preserved as such, and how and why each can be damaged or destroyed. On a large scale, the geologic information demonstrates the interdependency of pre-existing topography, rising sea level, and the resulting changes in geologic processes and reef evolution as applied to the modern reef ecosystem. On a smaller scale, sediment composition demonstrates the interdependency of corals and other organisms on changes in landforms and geologic processes with rising sea level. Integration of knowledge of these intricate interdependencies, both past and present, with resource-stewardship practices will help achieve the goals of attaining sustainable ecologic, cultural, and socioeconomic systems within the Parks and Sanctuaries.
Structural and age assessment of the pre-existing bedrock framework that underlies the Keys and reef tract is made to determine where reefs lived during the last 10,000 years, relative to rising sea level, and where they live today. This approach involves mapping the variable bedrock surface and showing how rising sea level gradually flooded the platform and caused reefs and sediments to accumulate in some areas and not in others. To acquire the necessary information, seismic profiles (a type of sound-wave line-drawing "photograph" taken through sediment and rock) are obtained that enable measurements of depth to bedrock and sediment thickness. Peats (plant remains that formed in a water-saturated environment) that accumulated at old shorelines and are now buried beneath reefs, and corals that formed during those 10,000 years are core-drilled for radiometric dating to develop a local sea-level curve and to determine how coral growth patterns, species, and distributions changed. A sea-level curve is a graph that shows the depth below present sea level at which the cored peats and corals are found today versus their age in thousands of years. Landward migration and zonation (different coral species) of reefs are known responses to rising sea level and the ensuing transition from low- to high-energy conditions. Understanding these changes and projecting future shorelines onto topographic maps enables predictions of how small a rise (<2 m, or 6.5 ft) would be necessary to flood more than half the Keys, much of which are currently uninhabitable wetland mangroves. In a rise of ~5 m (16 ft), the Keys would drown, reefs at the margin would no longer be protective barriers against catastrophic storm surges, salt water would infiltrate and contaminate potable aquifer water, and live corals would reestablish growth on the submerged Keys. The Keys themselves were once a linear coral reef 125,000 years ago. In terms of our presently eroding shorelines and vanishing wetlands, the effect of rising sea level, regardless of rate, may well be felt in South Florida within the next 100 years.
Geologic maps show contoured depth to bedrock and sediment thickness. Aerial photomosaics accompany these maps with interpreted distribution and types of livebottom (biologic/ecologic) habitats and locations of barren sand or rock. Managers and regulators use the mapped information to select those sites most accessible but least harmful to the ecosystem for location of fixed navigational structures, anchorage of mooring buoys to bedrock, design and placement of entrenched offshore drainage or sewer outfall pipes, and replacement of lighthouses destroyed by fire or hurricanes. The maps show that lime mud and sands are thickest in bedrock depressions. Because sediments form a barrier to upward movement of pollution-laden groundwater through the limestone, areas where sediment cover is thin or absent (bedrock highs) are those where contaminants would most likely seep into the ecosystem. This information is used to avoid outfall installations near such areas and to increase efforts to enhance local environmental conditions. However, the bedrock highs are also those areas where live corals can best be transplanted directly onto bedrock. Where sediment cover is thick, large cement structures elevated above the adjacent sediment-water contact must first be constructed for coral transplantation. Sediment data are also suitable for selecting optimal areas for seagrass restoration. The biologic/ecologic facts are used to weigh the delicate balance between allowing permits to salvage unique 16th, 17th, and 18th century archeological finds (gold-bearing Spanish galleons) or establishing aquatic archeological preserves to minimize impact, thereby maximizing societal value of both. In offshore areas where sediment is thick and strong currents prohibit formation of livebottom communities other than those of green algae, the sediment thickness information supplies commercial interests with knowledge about a self-generating (renewable) potential mineral resource (carbonate sands) for use in construction, beach renourishment, and chemical manufacturing (industrial paints, PVC, and purification of acid smoke-stack emissions).
Carbonate sands in a reef ecosystem are composed solely of skeletal grains of biota inherent to the ecosystem. Different organisms occupy different niches depending upon location -- quiet nearshore waters vs. offshore surf zones, or opposite protective land masses vs. open tidal passes. Tidal passes link turbid, nutrient-enriched waters from Biscayne Bay, Florida Bay, and the Gulf of Mexico to the clear, nutrient-poor waters of the reef tract. In Florida, sands are formed in place and essentially remain in place. Intense wave action of storms and hurricanes redistribute but do not remove the sands from the confines of their origin. Florida's sands consist of three primary grains: those of the calcified green alga Halimeda, molluscs, and corals (see Plate). Coral sands are produced when corals are weakened by environmental (disease, turbidity, or contaminants) or mechanical damage (divers, anchors, storms, or ship groundings) and their injured skeletons become targets for attack by other organisms (bacterial diseases, grazing parrotfish and Diadema, and boring algae, barnacles, fungi, molluscs, and sponges). Coral grains dominate sands where coral health is poor. Halimeda and mollusc sands dominate where coral health is better. The healthiest reefs occur off land masses and the least healthy occur off the widest tidal passes. Throughout the reef tract, corals are generally perceived as declining. Reef-building corals influenced by clear oceanic waters are being replaced by soft coral-algae-sponge communities influenced by turbid continental waters. Coral-sand percentages mimic this decline by increased amounts in seaward and southwesterly directions. Management and reef researchers can use coral-sand percentages to predict variability and evaluate influence and effects of coastal processes and ecosystem response to human impact and natural sources of change (floods, hurricanes, and rise or fall of sea level). An increased understanding of the close linkage between, and variety in, the physical environments and biological communities is required. Comparison of the percentages of coral grains with known reef vitality along the reef tract suggests that a measure of reef vitality may be possible through monitoring of changes in the coral-sand fraction. Based on coral-grain percentages obtained from sediment samples collected in 1989, the Plate maps show a guideline relation between healthiest reefs and a sand content of <10% coral, declining reefs and a sand content of <30% coral, and senescent (essentially dead) reefs and a sand content of >30% coral. This relation is not apparent near Miami, where reefs are senescent yet coral percentages are low. The cause is the lengthy absence of the primary biological source of coral sands, Diadema antillarum, and the proliferation of algal-molluscan communities due to nutrient enrichment. Sands in approximately two-thirds of the study area from Miami to Key West contain up to or greater than 30% coral grains. In some areas, notably along the outer margin off the middle and lower Keys, coral-sand grains exceed 60%. These elevated percentages suggest that the reefs are indeed in peril.
This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Click here for a printable version of this open file report (note: document will
open in a new browser window)
For more information contact:
Barbara H. Lidz Additional copies of this report and other information are available from:
600 4th Street South
For additional information on Environmental Quality and Preservation see:
http://sofia.usgs.gov - South Florida Ecosystem Program Information http://marine.usgs.gov - USGS Coastal and Marine Program Information
|
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/ofr/97-453/index.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 04 November, 2004 @ 01:34 PM (KP)