[Federal Register: March 3, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 42)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9949-9954]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr04-14]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[FRL-7629-6; LA-66-1-7598a]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants: Louisiana; Plan for Controlling Emissions
From Existing Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking a direct
final action to approve the sections 111(d)/129 State Plan submitted by
the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) on February
18, 2003. The State Plan establishes emission limits, monitoring,
operating, and recordkeeping requirements for commercial and industrial
solid waste
[[Page 9950]]
incinerator (CISWI) units for which construction commenced on or before
November 30, 1999.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective on May 3, 2004, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 2, 2004.
If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, by
facsimile, or through hand delivery/courier by following the detailed
instructions provided under the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
Supplemental Information section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kenneth W. Boyce, Air Planning
Section, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2833, at (214) 665-7259 or
boyce.kenneth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' are used we mean the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
II. Background
III. Why Does EPA Want To Regulate Air Emissions From CISWIs?
IV. When Did EPA First Publish These Requirements?
V. Why Does EPA Need To Approve State Plans?
VI. What Did The State Submit As Part Of Its State Plan?
VII. Why Is EPA Approving Louisiana's State Plan?
VIII. Who Must Comply With The Requirements?
IX. Are Any Sources Exempt From The Requirements?
X. By What Date Must CISWIs In Louisiana Achieve Compliance?
XI. What Happens If A CISWI Does Not/Cannot Meet The Requirements By
The Final Compliance Date?
XII. Final Action
XIII. Public Participation
XIV. Statutory And Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the sections
111(d)/129 State Plan submitted by the Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ) on February 18, 2003. The State Plan
establishes emission limits, monitoring, operating, and recordkeeping
requirements for commercial and industrial solid waste incinerator
(CISWI) units for which construction commenced on or before November
30, 1999. This State Plan implements and enforces provisions at least
as protective as the Federal Emission Guidelines (EGs) applicable to
existing CISWIs. The State Plan becomes federally enforceable upon
EPA's approval.
II. Background
Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that
``designated'' pollutants, regulated under standards of performance for
new stationary sources by section 111(b) of the CAA, must also be
controlled at existing sources in the same source category to a level
stipulated in an emission guideline (EG) document. Section 129 of the
CAA specifically addresses solid waste combustion and emissions
controls based on what is commonly referred to as ``maximum achievable
control technology'' (MACT). Section 129 requires EPA to promulgate a
MACT based emission guidelines document for CISWI units, and then
requires states to develop plans that implement the EG requirements.
The CISWI EG under 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD, establishes
emission and operating requirements under the authority of the sections
111(d) and 129 of the CAA. States must also include in their State
Plans other elements, such as inventories, legal authority, and public
participation documentation, to demonstrate their ability to enforce
the State Plans. These requirements must be incorporated into a State
plan that is ``at least as protective'' as the EG, and is federally
enforceable upon approval by EPA. The procedures for adoption and
submittal of State plans are codified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
III. Why Does EPA Want To Regulate Air Emissions From CISWIs?
When burned, commercial and industrial solid wastes emit various
air pollutants, including hydrochloric acid, dioxin/furan, toxic metals
(lead, cadmium, and mercury) and particulate matter. Mercury is highly
hazardous and is of particular concern because it persists in the
environment and bioaccumulates through the food web. Serious
developmental and adult effects in humans, primarily damage to the
nervous system, have been associated with exposures to mercury. Harmful
effects in wildlife have also been reported; these include nervous
system damage and behavioral and reproductive deficits. Human and
wildlife exposure to mercury occur mainly through eating of fish. When
inhaled, mercury vapor attacks also the lung tissue and is a cumulative
poison. Short-term exposure to mercury in certain forms can cause
hallucinations and impair consciousness. Long-term exposure to mercury
in certain forms can affect the central nervous system and cause kidney
damage.
Exposure to particulate matter can aggravate existing respiratory
and cardiovascular disease and increase risk of premature death.
Hydrochloric acid is a clear colorless gas. Chronic exposure to
hydrochloric acid has been reported to cause gastritis, chronic
bronchitis, dermatitis, and photosensitization. Acute exposure to high
levels of chlorine in humans may result in chest pain, vomiting, toxic
pneumonitis, pulmonary edema, and death. At lower levels, chlorine is a
potent irritant to the eyes, the upper respiratory tract, and lungs.
Exposure to dioxin and furan can cause skin disorders, cancer, and
reproductive effects such as endometriosis. These pollutants can also
affect the immune system.
IV. When Did EPA First Publish These Requirements?
The EPA proposed the EGs in the Federal Register on November 30,
1999. 64 FR 67092. On December 1, 2000, EPA finalized the EGs. 65 FR
75338. The EGs are also found at 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD.
V. Why Does EPA Need To Approve State Plans?
EGs are not federally enforceable. Section 129(b)(2) of the CAA
requires States to submit State Plans to EPA for approval. Each State
must show that its State Plan will carry out and enforce the EGs. State
Plans must be at least as protective as the EGs, and they become
federally enforceable upon EPA's approval. The procedures for adopting
and submitting State Plans are in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
VI. What Did the State Submit as Part of Its State Plan?
The State of Louisiana submitted its sections 111(d)/129 State Plan
to EPA for approval on February 18, 2003. The State adopted the EG
requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD by incorporation by
reference (IBR) into the Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC
33:III.3003.B.6) on October 20, 2002. The State Plan also included a
demonstration of the State's legal authority to carry out the plan,
inventory of sources and emissions, evidence of a public hearing on the
State Plan, and provisions for submission of progress reports to EPA.
[[Page 9951]]
VII. Why Is EPA Approving Louisiana's State Plan?
EPA has evaluated the CISWI State Plan submitted by Louisiana for
consistency with the Act, EPA guidelines and policy. EPA has determined
that Louisiana's State Plan meets all requirements and therefore, EPA
is approving Louisiana's Plan to implement and enforce the EGs as it
applies to existing CISWIs.
EPA's approval of Louisiana's State Plan is based on our findings
that:
(1) LDEQ provided adequate public notice of public hearings for the
proposed rulemaking that allows Louisiana to carry out and enforce
provisions that are at least as protective as the EGs for CISWIs; and
(2) LDEQ demonstrated legal authority to: adopt emission standards
and compliance schedules applicable to the designated facilities;
enforce applicable laws, regulations, standards and compliance
schedules; seek injunctive relief; obtain information necessary to
determine compliance; require recordkeeping; conduct inspections and
tests; require the use of monitors; require emission reports of owners
and operators; and make emission data publicly available.
A detailed discussion of EPA's evaluation of the State Plan is
included in the technical support document (TSD) located in the public
rulemaking file for this action and available from the EPA contact
listed in the Public Participation section of this document.
VIII. Who Must Comply With the Requirements?
All CISWIs that commenced construction on or before November 30,
1999, must comply with these requirements.
IX. Are Any Sources Exempt From the Requirements?
The following incinerator source categories are exempt from the
Federal requirements for CISWIs:
(1) Pathological waste incineration units;
(2) Agricultural waste incineration units;
(3) Municipal waste combustion units;
(4) Hospital/medical/infectious waste incineration units;
(5) Small power production facilities;
(6) Cogeneration facilities;
(7) Hazardous waste combustion units;
(8) Materials recovery units;
(9) Air curtain incinerators;
(10) Cyclonic barrel burners;
(11) Rack, part, and drum reclamation units;
(12) Cement kilns;
(13) Sewage sludge incinerators;
(14) Chemical recovery units; and
(15) Laboratory analysis units.
Please refer to 40 CFR 60.2555 for specific definitions of these
incinerator source categories, and any recordkeeping or other
requirements that still may need to be met.
X. By What Date Must CISWIs in Louisiana Achieve Compliance?
If a CISWI cannot achieve compliance within one year of the
effective date of EPA approval of the State Plan, the operator must
agree to meet certain increments of progress until it achieves
compliance. Section VI of the State Plan details the increments of
progress for the affected CISWI. All existing CISWI units in the State
of Louisiana must comply with these requirements by December 1, 2005.
XI. What Happens if a CISWI Does Not/Cannot Meet the Requirements by
the Final Compliance Date?
Any existing CISWI that fails to meet the requirements by December
1, 2005, must shut down. The unit will not be allowed to start up until
the owner/operator installs the controls necessary to meet the
requirements on the date the unit restarts operation.
XII. Final Action
EPA is publishing this approval action without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate
document that will serve as the proposal to approve the State Plan
should relevant adverse comments be filed. If EPA receives no
significant, material, and adverse comments by April 2, 2004, this
action will be effective on May 3, 2004.
If EPA receives significant, material, and adverse comments by the
above date, the Agency will withdraw this action before the effective
date by publishing a subsequent document in the Federal Register. EPA
will address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule
based on the parallel proposed rule published in today's Federal
Register. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time.
XIII. Public Participation
A. What Is the Public Rulemaking File?
EPA is committed to ensuring public access to the information that
is used to inform the Agency's decisions regarding the environment and
human health and to ensuring that the public has an opportunity to
participate in the Agency's decision process. The official public
rulemaking file consists of the documents specifically referenced in
this action, any public comments received, and other information
related to this action. The public rulemaking file does not include
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute, although such information is a
part of the administrative record for this action. The public
rulemaking file is the collection of materials that is available for
public viewing at the Regional Office. The administrative record is the
collection of material used to inform the Agency's decision on this
rulemaking action.
B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
1. An official public rulemaking file available for inspection at
the Regional Office. The Regional Office has established an official
public rulemaking file for this action under NM-40-2-7445a. The public
rulemaking file is available for viewing at the Air Planning Section,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. EPA requests that, if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section two working days in advance to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
2. Copies of the State submittal. Copies of the State submittal is
also available for public inspection during official business hours, by
appointment at the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Air
Quality Division, 7290 Bluebonnet Boulevard, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
70810.
3. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the Regulation.gov Web site located at http://www.regulations.gov
where you can find, review, and submit comments on
Federal rules that are open for comment and have been published in the
Federal Register.
The E Government Act of 2002 states that ``to the extent
practicable'' agencies shall accept electronic comments and establish
electronic dockets. Also, President Bush's management plan for
government includes a government-
[[Page 9952]]
wide electronic rulemaking system. The first phase of the eRulemaking
initiative was the development of a Federal portal that displays all
Federal Register notices and proposed rules open for comment. The URL
for this site is http://www.regulations.gov. The site also provides the
public with the ability to submit electronic comments that then can be
transferred to the Agency responsible for the rule.
EPA's policy is to make all comments it receives, whether submitted
electronically or on paper, available for public viewing at the
Regional Office as EPA receives them and without change. However, those
portions of a comment that contain properly identified and claimed CBI
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute will be
excluded from the public rulemaking file. The entire comment, including
publicly restricted information, will be included in the administrative
record for this action.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket identification number in the subject line on the
first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after
the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not
required to consider these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or
information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the
instructions in section I.D, below. Do not use e-mail to submit CBI or
information protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside
of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying
the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment, and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public rulemaking file, and may be made
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. E-mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to
boyce.kenneth@epa.gov, Attention ``Public comment on proposed
rulemaking LA-66-1-7598.'' In contrast to EPA's electronic public
docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If
you send an e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through
EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system automatically
captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses that are automatically
captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in
EPA's electronic public docket.
ii. Regulations.gov. As an alternative to email, you may submit
comments electronically to EPA by using the Federal Web-based portal
that displays all Federal Register notices and proposed rules open for
comment. To use this method, access the Regulations.gov Web site at
http://www.regulations.gov, then select ``Environmental Protection
Agency'' at the top of the page and click on the ``Go'' button. The
list of current EPA actions available for comment will be displayed.
Select the appropriate action and please follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Unlike EPA's email system, the Regulations.gov
Web site is an ``anonymous'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity, e-mail address, or other contact information, unless you
provide it in the text of your comment.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified in section I.C.2,
directly below. These electronic submissions will be accepted in
WordPerfect, Word, or ASCII file format. You should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to: Kenneth Boyce, Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733. Please include the text ``Public comment on proposed
rulemaking LA-66- 1-7598'' in the subject line of the first page of
your comments.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your written comments or
comments on a disk or CD ROM to: Kenneth Boyce, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733, Attention ``Public comment on proposed rulemaking LA-
66- 1-7598''. Such deliveries are only accepted during official hours
of business, which are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?
For comments submitted to the Agency by mail or hand delivery, in
either paper or electronic format, you may assert a business
confidentiality claim covering confidential business information (CBI)
included in your comment by clearly marking any part or all of the
information as CBI at the time the comment is submitted to EPA. CBI
should be submitted separately, if possible, to facilitate handling by
EPA. Submit one complete version of the comment that includes the
properly labeled CBI for EPA's official docket and one copy that does
not contain the CBI to be included in the public docket. If you submit
CBI on a disk or CD ROM, mark the on the outside of the disk or the CD
ROM that it contains CBI and then identify the CBI within the disk or
CD ROM. Also submit a non-CBI version if possible. Information which is
properly labeled as CBI and submitted by mail or hand deliver will be
disclosed only in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part
2. For comments submitted by EPA's e-mail system or through
Regulations.gov, no CBI claim may be asserted. Do not submit CBI to
Regulations.gov or via EPA's e-mail system. Any claim of CBI will be
waived for comments received through Regulations.gov or EPA's e-mail
system. For further advice on submitting CBI to the Agency, contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
E. Privacy Notice
It is important to note that the comments you provide to EPA will
be publicly disclosed in a rulemaking docket or on the internet. The
comments are made available for public viewing as EPA receives them and
without change. Any personal information you choose to include in your
comment will be included in the docket. However, EPA will exclude from
the public docket any information labeled confidential business
information (CBI), copyrighted material or other information restricted
from disclosure by statute.
Comments submitted via Regulations.gov will not collect any
[[Page 9953]]
personal information, e-mail addresses, or contact information unless
they are included in the body of the comment. Comments submitted via
Regulations.gov will be submitted anonymously unless you include
personal information in the body of the comment. Please be advised that
EPA cannot contact you for any necessary clarification if technical
difficulties arise unless your contact information is included in the
body of comments submitted through Regulations.gov. However, EPA's e-
mail system is not an anonymous system. Email addresses are
automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system and included as part of
your comment that is placed in the public rulemaking docket.
F. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide any technical information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at your estimate.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternatives.
7. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket
identification number in the subject line on the first page of your
response. It would also be helpful if you provided the name, date, and
Federal Register citation related to your comments.
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing State plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a State plan submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a
State plan submission, to use VCS in place of a State plan submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule
does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 3, 2004. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride,
Intergovernmental relations, Paper and paper products industry,
Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Sulfuric acid plants, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: February 13, 2004.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart T--Louisiana
0
2. Section 62.4620 is amended by adding paragraphs (b)(6)and (c)(7) to
read as follows:
Sec. 62.4620 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) Control of air emissions from existing commercial and
industrial solid waste incineration units, submitted by the Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality on February 18, 2003 (LAC
33:III.3003.B.6).
* * * * *
[[Page 9954]]
(c) * * *
(7) Commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units.
0
3. Subpart T is amended by adding a new undesignated center heading and
a new Sec. Sec. 62.4670 and 62.4671 to read as follows: Existing
Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units
Sec. 62.4670 Identification of sources.
The plan applies to the following existing commercial and
industrial solid waste incineration units:
(a) BASF Corporation, Geismar, Louisiana.
(b) DSM Copolymer, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
(c) LA Skid & Pallet Co., Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
(d) Shell Chemicals, Norco, Louisiana.
Sec. 62.4671 Effective date.
The effective date of this portion of the State's plan applicable
to existing commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units is
May 3, 2004.
[FR Doc. 04-4622 Filed 3-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P