Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 1. | Revisions to Digital Flight Data Recorder Regulations for B-737 Airplanes and for Part 125 Operators | Red | |
| Popular Title:Digital Flight Data Recorder/B-737 |
| RIN 2120-AG87 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 11/18/1999; End of Comment Period 12/20/1999; SNPRM Publication Date 09/05/06; End of Comment Period 12/04/06 |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations governing flight data recorders to increase the number of digital flight data recorder parameters for all Boeing 737 series airplanes manufactured after August 18, 2000. This change is based on safety recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board following its investigations of two accidents and several incidents involving 737s. This rulemaking would also adopt a prohibition on deviations from flight recorder requirements for all airplanes operated under part 125. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/15/1999 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 05/29/2000 | 11/03/3000 | 10/25/2000 | | To OMB | 06/28/2000 | 12/04/2000 | 12/26/2000 | | Returned by OMB | | | 09/18/2001 | | Resubmitted to OST | | 04/30/2004 | 05/04/2004 | | Returned to Mode | | | 09/08/2004 | | Resubmitted to OST/3 | | 12/01/2004 | 11/08/2004 | | Resubmitted to OST/4 | | | 03/07/2005 | | Returned to Mode/2 | | | 06/13/2005 | | Resubmitted to OST/5 | | 06/12/2008 | 06/20/2008 | | Resubmitted to OMB | | 09/21/2008 | 09/05/2008 | | OMB Clearance | 07/28/2000 | 12/05/2008 | | | Publication Date | 08/11/2000 | 12/15/2008 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Unanticipated issues requiring further analysis
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 2. | Aging Aircraft Program (Widespread Fatigue Damage) | Red | |
| Popular Title:Aging Aircraft Widespread Fatigue |
| RIN 2120-AI05 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 4/18/2006; End of Comment Period 7/17/2006; Extended Comment Period 7/17/2006; End of Extended Comment Period 9/18/2006. |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would require design approval holders to establish limits of validity (LOVs) of the engineering data that support the maintenance programs for certain transport category airplanes, and it would require them to determine if maintenance actions are needed to prevent widespread fatigue damage before an airplane reaches its LOV. This rulemaking would require operators of any affected airplane to incorporate the LOV into the airworthiness limitations section of the instructions for continued airworthiness. This rulemaking would also prohibit operation of an affected airplane beyond the LOV, unless an operator has incorporated an extended LOV and any necessary service information into its maintenance program. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 02/14/2004 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 05/14/2007 | 10/31/2008 | | | To OMB | 06/20/2007 | 11/28/2008 | | | OMB Clearance | 09/20/2007 | 02/27/2009 | | | Publication Date | 09/28/2007 | 03/13/2009 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Unanticipated issues requiring further analysis
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 3. | Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area | Green | |
| Popular Title:DC Flight Rules |
| RIN 2120-AI17 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date: 08/04/2005; End of Comment Period 11/02/2005; Publication Date for Extension of Comment Period 11/07/2005; End of Extended Comment Period 02/06/2006. |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would codify restrictions for certain aircraft operations in the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area. This action is necessary because of the ongoing threat of terrorist attacks. The FAA intends by this action to help the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense protect national assets in the National Capital region. We are developing the rule in conjunction with the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security. |
Effects:
| | Regulatory Flexibility Act
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/18/2003 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 10/31/2008 | | | | To OMB | 11/26/2008 | | | | OMB Clearance | 01/08/2009 | | | | Publication Date | 01/16/2009 | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 4. | Part 145: Repair Stations--Ratings and Quality System
| Red | |
| Popular Title:Part 145 |
| RIN 2120-AI53 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations for repair stations by revising the system of ratings and requiring repair stations to establish a quality program. This rulemaking would add changes critical to maintaining safety. These include: requiring a repair station to maintain a capability list; requiring a repair station to designate a chief inspector; requiring permanent housing for all repair stations for their facilities, equipment, materials, and personnel; and identifying reasons for denying a repair station certificate, especially when a previously held certificate has been revoked. In addition, the rulemaking would clarify recent revisions to the repair station regulations. This action is necessary to reflect changes in aviation technology and repair station business practices. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/18/2001 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 11/18/2008 | 02/13/2009 | | | To OMB | 01/20/2009 | 04/14/2009 | | | OMB Clearance | 03/20/2009 | 06/16/2009 | | | Publication Date | 03/25/2009 | 06/24/2009 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Awaiting development of additional data
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 5. | Security Related Considerations in the Design and Operation of Transport Category Airplanes | Red | |
| Popular Title:Security Considerations |
| RIN 2120-AI66 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 01/05/07; End of Comment Period 04/05/07 |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would implement certain security related requirements governing the design of transport category airplanes. The requirements would provide improved airplane design features and greater protection of the cabin, flightdeck, and cargo compartments from the detonation of explosive or incendiary devices, penetration by projectiles, and intrusion by unauthorized persons. The FAA would also require operators to establish a "least risk bomb location" on all affected airplanes and to incorporate certain information into relevant manuals. This rule would adopt several International Civil Aviation Organization standards and harmonize FAA and international regulations. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/04/2001 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 04/24/2008 | 06/06/2008 | 05/30/2008 | | To OMB | 05/29/2008 | 07/29/2008 | 07/29/2008 | | OMB Clearance | 09/01/2008 | 10/29/2008 | 09/05/2008 | | Publication Date | 09/18/2008 | 11/04/2008 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Unanticipated issues requiring further analysis
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 6. | Congestion Management Rule for LaGuardia Airport | Green | |
| Popular Title:LaGuardia Airport |
| RIN 2120-AI70 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 08/09/06; End of Comment Period 10/30/06; Comment Period Extended 10/24/06; End of Extended Comment Period 12/26/06. |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would provide a long-term solution to increased congestion and delay at New York´s LaGuardia Airport (LaGuardia). The rulemaking, if adopted, would establish an operational limit on the number of aircraft landing and taking off at the airport. The rulemaking would also allocate the majority of operations as slots to current operators at the airport and stimulate a market by auctioning off a limited number of slots.
|
Effects:
| | Economically Significant
Major
Information Collection
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 08/04/2005 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 09/10/2008 | | 09/10/2008 | | To OMB | 09/17/2008 | | 09/17/2008 | | OMB Clearance | 10/08/2008 | | 10/03/2008 | | Publication Date | 10/08/2008 | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 7. | Production and Airworthiness Approvals | Green | |
| Popular Title:Production and Airworthiness Approvals |
| RIN 2120-AI78 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 10/05/2006; End of Comment Period 01/03/2007; Extended Comment Period Publication Date 12/20/06; Extended Comment Period Date 02/05/2007 |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would change certification procedures and identification requirements for aeronautical products and parts. The changes would address standardizing requirements for production approval holders; requiring production approval holders to issue airworthiness approvals for aircraft engines, propellers, and other aviation parts; requiring manufacturers to mark all parts and components; and revising export airworthiness approval requirements to facilitate global manufacturing. The intent of these changes is to promote safety by ensuring that aircraft, and parts designed specifically for use in aircraft, wherever maunufactured, meet applicable standards. This action is also necessary to update our regulations to reflect the current gobal aircraft and aircraft parts manufacturing environment. |
Effects:
| | Regulatory Flexibility Act
Information Collection
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/04/2001 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 10/27/2008 | | | | To OMB | 11/28/2008 | | | | OMB Clearance | 02/26/2009 | | | | Publication Date | 03/13/2009 | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Additional coordination necessary
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 8. | Commuter Operations in Very Light Jets (VLJs) | Red | |
| Popular Title:VLJ |
| RIN 2120-AI84 |
| Stage: NPRM |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This proposal would establish a rule to allow passenger-carrying commuter operations to be conducted under the provisions of part 135 using multiengine turbojets, certificated under either part 23 or part 25, configured with 9 or fewer passenger seats. This proposal, if adopted, would allow multiengine turbojet operators to provide commuter service to the traveling public, thus accommodating new techonologies and a new generation of turbojet airplanes that otherwise would not be allowed in part 135 commuter service. Since 1995, turbojets used in scheduled operations must operate under the provisions of part 121. This current rulemaking resulted, in part, from recommendations from the Aviation Rulemaking Committee for parts 14 CFR 135/125 and covers pilot crew, equipment, training, and dispatch requirements for the safe operation of this new generation airplane. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 03/15/2006 |
Dates for NPRM:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 12/29/2006 | 12/11/2008 | | | To OMB | 01/31/2007 | 01/14/2009 | | | OMB Clearance | 02/27/2007 | 04/16/2009 | | | Publication Date | 03/13/2007 | 05/04/2009 | | | End of Comment Period | 06/13/2007 | 08/04/2009 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Additional coordination necessary
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 9. | Re-registration and Renewal of Aircraft Registration | Black | |
| Popular Title:Re-registration & Renewal of Aircraft Registration |
| RIN 2120-AI89 |
| Stage: Undetermined |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 2/28/2008; End of Comment Period 8/28/2008 |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would amend requirements concerning the registration of aircraft. The rulemaking is based on the need to increase and maintain the accuracy of aircraft registration information in the Civil Aviation Registry. This rulemaking would ensure aircraft owners periodically provide information regarding changes in registration. The rulemaking would respond to the concerns of law enforcement and other government agencies and would provide more accurate, up-to-date aircraft registration information to all users of the Civil Aviation Registry database. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 11/30/2004 |
Dates for Undetermined:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | | | | | To OMB | | | | | OMB Clearance | | | | | Publication Date | | | | | End of Comment Period | | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 10. | Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) Equipage Mandate To Support Air Traffic Control Service | Black | |
| Popular Title:ADS-B |
| RIN 2120-AI92 |
| Stage: NPRM |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 10/05/2007; End of Comment Period 11/19/07; Comment Period Extended 01/03/2008; End of Extended Comment Period 03/03/2008. |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would require Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) Out equipment on aircraft to operate in certain classes of airspace within the United States National Airspace System. The rulemaking is necessary to accommodate the expected increase in demand for air transportation, as described in the Next Generation Air Transportation System Integrated Plan. The intended effect of this rule is to provide the Federal Aviation Administration with a comprehensive surveillance system that accommodates the anticipated increase in operations and would provide a platform for additional flight applications and services. |
Effects:
| | Economically Significant
Major
Regulatory Flexibility Act
EU
NAFTA
Foreign
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/26/2006 |
Dates for NPRM:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 04/02/2007 | 06/01/2007 | 06/01/2007 | | To OMB | 05/02/2007 | 06/29/2007 | 07/05/2007 | | OMB Clearance | 08/02/2007 | 09/28/2007 | 10/01/2007 | | Publication Date | 08/16/2007 | 10/05/2007 | 10/05/2007 | | End of Comment Period | 11/16/2007 | 01/04/2008 | 01/03/2008 | | Publication Date for Extension of Comment Period | | | 11/19/2007 | | End of Extended Reply Comment Period | | | 03/03/2008 | | Reopening of Comment Period | | | 10/02/2008 | | End of Reopened Comment Period | | | 11/03/2008 | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Additional coordination necessary
Unanticipated issues requiring further analysis
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 72 FR 56947 |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 11. | Flight Crewmember Duty Limitations and Rest Requirements | Black | |
| Popular Title:Duty Limitations And Rest Requirements |
| RIN 2120-AI93 |
| Stage: Undetermined |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date 12/20/1995; End of Comment Period 03/19/1996; Comment Period Extended 3/20/1996; End of Extended Comment Period 6/19/1996. |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations on duty period limitations, flight time limitations, and rest requirements for flight crewmembers engaged in air transportation. The changes would respond to the need to ensure that the rules will continue to provide the minimum level of safety. This rulemaking responds to public and congressional interest in regulating flight crewmember rest requirements, NTSB Safety Recommendations, petitions for rulemaking, and scientific data. This action is considered significant because of substantial public interest. The FAA is considering proposing additional changes in response to comments received on the NPRM. |
Effects:
| | Economically Significant
Major
Unfunded Mandate
Regulatory Flexibility Act
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 11/28/1995 |
Dates for Undetermined:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | | | | | To OMB | | | | | OMB Clearance | | | | | Publication Date | | | | | End of Comment Period | | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for Undetermined: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 12. | Qualification, Service, and Use of Crewmembers and Aircraft Dispatchers | Red | |
| Popular Title:Part 121, Subparts N and O |
| RIN 2120-AJ00 |
| Stage: NPRM |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations for crewmember and dispatcher training programs in domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. The rulemaking would enhance traditional training programs by requiring the use of flight simulation training devices for flight crewmembers and including additional training requirements in areas that are critical to safety. The rulemaking would also reorganize and revise the qualification and training requirements. The changes are intended to contribute significantly to reducing aviation accidents. |
Effects:
| | Regulatory Flexibility Act
Information Collection
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 03/12/1999 |
Dates for NPRM:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 04/27/2007 | 09/28/2007 | 10/03/2007 | | To OMB | 05/29/2007 | 03/03/2008 | 03/06/2008 | | OMB Clearance | 08/29/2007 | 07/03/2008 | 06/06/2008 | | Publication Date | 09/10/2007 | 11/28/2008 | | | End of Comment Period | 01/10/2008 | 03/30/2009 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | Additional coordination necessary
|
|
| Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 13. | Part 121 Pilot Age Limit | Red | |
| Popular Title:Age 65 |
| RIN 2120-AJ01 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Code of Federal Regulations to bring it into conformance with recent legislation raising the upper age limit for pilots serving in domestic, flag, and supplemental operations until they reach their 65th birthday. Congress recently enacted legislation, effective December 13, 2007, mandating an Age-65 limit for pilots for purposes of Title 49 USC. |
Effects:
| | Economically Significant
Major
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 01/30/2007 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 03/28/2009 | | 06/26/2008 | | Returned to Mode | | | 10/01/2008 | | Resubmitted to OST | | | 10/03/2008 | | To OMB | 04/29/2008 | 11/03/2008 | | | OMB Clearance | 07/29/2008 | 02/03/2009 | | | Publication Date | 08/07/2008 | 02/10/2009 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 14. | Safety Management Systems (SMS) | Green | |
| Popular Title:SMS |
| RIN 2120-AJ15 |
| Stage: ANPRM |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would require a Safety Management System (SMS) for FAA certificate holders, certain product manufacturers, applicants, and employers. This action is being taken to further enhance the practice of managing safety, conducting risk and system assessments and analysis, undertaking preventive and corrective actions, and creating a safety culture. The intended effect of this action would make the United States compliant with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) annexes. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 09/25/2007 |
Dates for ANPRM:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 11/25/2008 | 11/18/2008 | | | To OMB | 12/26/2008 | 11/18/2008 | | | OMB Clearance | 03/26/2009 | 02/18/2009 | | | Publication Date | 04/08/2009 | 02/19/2009 | | | End of Comment Period | 06/08/2009 | 05/19/2009 | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for ANPRM: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 15. | Congestion Management Rule for John F. Kennedy International Airport and Newark Liberty International Airport | Green | |
| Popular Title:Congestion Mgt. JFK/Newark Airport |
| RIN 2120-AJ28 |
| Stage: Final Rule |
| Previous Stage:NPRM: Publication Date: 05/21/2008; End of Comment Period 07/21/2008 |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would establish procedures to address congestion in the New York City area by assigning slots at John F. Kennedy (JFK) and Newark Liberty (Newark) International Airports in a way that allows carriers to respond to market forces to drive efficient airline behavior. This rulemaking would be a companion to a separate rulemaking initiative addressing congestion mitigation at New York´s LaGuardia airport (RIN 2120-AI70). This rulemaking is similar to that rulemaking, but it takes into consideration the characteristics of both JFK and Newark, including the large number of international flights at these airports and our international obligations. This rulemaking would have one of two alternatives to extend the caps on the operations at the two airports, assign to existing operators the majority of slots at the airports, and create a market by annually auctioning off a limited number of slots in each of the first five years of the rule. |
Effects:
| | Economically Significant
Major
Information Collection
EU
NAFTA
Foreign
| |
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 03/15/2008 |
Dates for Final Rule:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 09/17/2008 | | 09/23/2008 | | To OMB | 09/17/2008 | | 09/24/2008 | | Returned to Mode | | | 10/02/2008 | | Resubmitted to OST | | | 10/02/2008 | | Returned To OMB | | | 10/03/2008 | | OMB Clearance | 10/01/2008 | | 10/03/2008 | | Publication Date | 10/08/2008 | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 16. | Crew Resources Management Training for Crewmembers and Flight Followers in Part 135 Operations | Green | |
| Popular Title:CRM Training for Part 135 Operations |
| RIN 2120-AJ32 |
| Stage: NPRM |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would require Crew Resource Management (CRM) training for all pilots and flight attendants in 14 CFR part 135 operations. CRM training teaches crewmembers to effectively use all resources available to them (e.g. hardware, software, and all persons involved in aircraft operation) to achieve safe and efficient flight operations. This rulemaking is needed to ensure that all crewmembers in part 135 operations receive training and practice in the use of CRM principles, as appropriate for their operation. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to reduce accidents and incidents within the scope of part 135 operations. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/01/2007 |
Dates for NPRM:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 12/01/2008 | | | | To OMB | 01/02/2009 | | | | OMB Clearance | 04/02/2009 | | | | Publication Date | 04/17/2009 | | | | End of Comment Period | 06/16/2009 | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |
Federal Aviation Administration
|
| 17. | Post Employment Restrictions Applicable to FAA Aviation Safety Inspectors | Green | |
| Popular Title:Post employment Restrictions |
| RIN 2120-AJ36 |
| Stage: NPRM |
| Previous Stage:None |
| Abstract: This rulemaking would prohibit a certificate holder from employing or contracting with a former Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) or other person with certificate holder oversight responsibilities to act as an agent or to represent that certificate holder in any matter before the FAA. This restriction would apply if the person, in the proceeding two year period has (a) served as, or was responsible for oversight of, a Flight Standards Service ASI; and (b) had the responsibility to inspect, or oversee the inspection of, the operations of the certificate holder. The rulemaking would enhance the FAA´s ability to properly perform its safety mission and to ensure that every passenger can have complete confidence in the integrity of the programs and operations administered by the FAA. |
Effects:
|
| Prompting action:None |
| |
| Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/16/2008 |
Dates for NPRM:
| Milestone | Originally
Scheduled
Date | New
Projected
Date | Actual
Date | | To OST | 03/17/2009 | | | | To OMB | 04/17/2009 | | | | OMB Clearance | 07/17/2009 | | | | Publication Date | 07/31/2009 | | | | End of Comment Period | 08/31/2009 | | | |
| Explanation for any delay: | N/A |
|
| Federal Register Citation for NPRM: None |