National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
59. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Convex Mirrors | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG41 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 09/12/2005; End of Comment Period 11/14/2005. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking would upgrade the rearward visibility of commercial straight trucks. The agency believes that requiring a rear detection system will reduce fatalities, injuries, and property damage by giving truck operators the ability to detect objects behind the truck. Various possible counter-measures are being examined now in follow-up testing, including visual and non-visual object detection systems. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 06/28/1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
60. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Roof Crush Resistance | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AG51 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: Request for Comments: Publication Date 10/22/01; End of Comment Period 12/06/01. NPRM: Publication Date 8/23/05; End of Comment Period 11/21/05. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: Mitigation of rollover fatal and serious injuries is one of the agency's highest priorities. Rollover crashes constitute about 3% of passenger vehicle crashes, but about 1/3 of the fatalities. Since light trucks are more prone to rollover, and as their percentage of the U.S. fleet continues to increase, this crash mode continues to constitute a disproportionate segment of the Nation's highway safety problem. As part of the agency's comprehensive approach to rollover, the agency is considering whether an upgrade to the roof crush requirements is warranted. This rulemaking is significant because of public interest in vehicle safety. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/13/1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Retention Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AH34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 12/15/2004; End of Comment Period 02/14/2005. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: As part of the agency's comprehensive approach to rollover, and to harmonize with the first global technical regulation, this rulemaking would upgrade the door retention requirements, add test requirements for sliding doors, add secondary latch requirements for doors other than hinged side doors and back doors, and provide a new test procedure for assessing inertial forces. This rulemaking would also respond to the requirements mandated in Title X, Subtitle C, Sec. 10301, section 30128 (c) (2) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005: Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 07/07/1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
62. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Definitions, Designated Seating Position | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AI94 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 06/22/2005; End of Comment Period 08/22/2005. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking would amend part 571.3 Definitions, to redefine the term "designated seating position" (DSP) in order to establish an objective criteria that is more enforceable. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 12/16/2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Side Impact Protection Upgrade | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 5/17/2004; End of Comment Period 10/14/2004; Reopening of Comment Period 1/2005; End of Reopened Comment Period 4/12/2005. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: Two Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) -- No. 201, "Occupant Protection in Interior Impact" and No. 214, "Side Impact Protection" -- specify requirements for side impact protection. At present, FMVSS No. 214 specifies a moving deformable barrier (MDB) test addressing mainly the chest injury problem. The head injury reduction is partially addressed in FMVSS No. 201. This rulemaking would require in FMVSS No. 214 a vehicle-to-pole oblique impact test to reduce the number of fatal and serious head injuries, which are not addressed in FMVSS No. 201. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 05/05/2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||
64. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Reduced Stopping Distance for Truck Tractors | |||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ37 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: Final Rule | |||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date: 12/15/2005; End of Comment Period 4/14/2006. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking would reduce stopping distance requirements for truck tractors equipped with air brake systems. Advances in heavy vehicle braking systems show that improved stopping performance is attainable for these vehicles. Such improvements would reduce the stopping distance disparity with light vehicles, and would result in fewer deaths and injuries and reduce property damage due to fewer crashes between truck tractors and light vehicles. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: None | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 04/02/2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for Final Rule:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for Final Rule: None |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Popular Title: Electronic Stability Control SAFETEA-LU | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RIN 2127-AJ77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stage: NPRM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Stage: NPRM: Publication Date 09/18/2006; End of Comment Period 11/17/2006. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: This rulemaking would establish a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard to require electronic stability control (ESC) systems on all newly-manufactured passenger cars and light trucks. The vast majority of rollovers occur in single-vehicle crashes involving loss of control. Crash data studies by NHTSA and other organizations worldwide show that ESC causes a dramatic reduction in single-vehicle crashes by assisting drivers in maintaining control in critical driving situations. NHTSA studies show a reduction in single-vehicle crashes of 34% to 59% and a reduction in single-vehicle crashes with rollover of over 70%. The requirement of ESC on cars and trucks could save thousands of lives annually. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prompting action: Statute | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rulemaking Project Initiated: 10/20/2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates for NPRM:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Register Citation for NPRM: 71 FR 54711 |