Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 92* 111 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 106* 131* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 100 120* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 98 119* Bloomington, IN....................... 94* 110 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 105* 131* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 117* 137* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 79* 98 Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 106* 113 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 96* 119* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 107* 129* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 113* 130* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 101 117* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 105* 121* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 104* 131* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 91* 112 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 101 126* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 102 127* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 107* 126* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 110* 123* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 125* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 105* 119* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 104* 113 Great Falls, MT....................... 92* 104 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 99 115* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 97* 123* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 118* 141* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 99 119* Honolulu, HI.......................... 108* 136* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 99 125* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85* 92* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 105* 102 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 96 96* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 98 105* Bloomington, IN....................... 94* 93* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 105* 109* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 112* 121* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 90* 81* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 97 115* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 95* 91* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 95 107 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 111* 113* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 102 109* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 102 107* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 97 108* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 93* 88* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 99 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 96* 102 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 103 113* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 107* 110* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94* 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 101 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 97 111* Great Falls, MT....................... 79* 102 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 97 100 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 92* 103 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 112* 128* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 87* 97 Honolulu, HI.......................... 103 120* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 100 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 96 92* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 102 110* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 110* 99 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 101 101 Bloomington, IN....................... 88* 94* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 105 100 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 113* 119* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 72* 80* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 108* 102 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 103 97 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 119* 107* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 116* 114* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 97 101 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 104 105* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 111 102 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 90* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 107 103 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 102 95* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 111* 106* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 104 109* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 96* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 112* 106* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 111* 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 96 86* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 91* 99 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 92* 97 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 114* 117* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 96 99 Honolulu, HI.......................... 115* 99 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 101 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 84* 89* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 95 105 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 91* 110* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 90* 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 80* 85* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 111* 97 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 130* 121* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 69* 90* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 120* 110* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 81* 86* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 93* 104 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 137* 118* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 94 104 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 107 107 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 103 106 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 98 83* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 93 101 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 106* 105 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 97 113* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 106 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 119* 93* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 109* 109* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 124* 104 Great Falls, MT....................... 115* 97 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 92* 96 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 83* 88* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 120 117* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 107* 93* Honolulu, HI.......................... 121* 112* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 94* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86* 95 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 98 110 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 90* 95 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 83* 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 91* 108* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 103 107* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 102 115* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 72* 77* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 101 106* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 96* 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 96 102 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 99 109* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 94 102 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 98 109* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 91* 102 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 86* 88* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 86* 101 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 100 106 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 94 106 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 110* 112* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 91* 102 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 94* 113* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 95* 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 94* 99 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 96 105 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 100 96 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 106 111* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 94* 104 Honolulu, HI.......................... 104 104 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 96 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 100 116* Iowa City, IA......................... 102 129* Johnstown, PA......................... 89* 100 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 103 115 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 107* 122* Knoxville, TN......................... 96* 131* Lincoln, NE........................... 92* 106 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 112* 136* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 99 114 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 99 122* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 102 131* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 106* 126* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 113* 140* Mobile, AL............................ 93* 99 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 102 114 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 120* 146* Ocala, FL............................. 94* 101 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 94* 109 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 95* 116 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 98 108 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109* 134* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 102 130* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 101 119* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 109* 126* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 114* 135* Reading, PA........................... 106* 140* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 101 120* Richmond, VA.......................... 102 124* Rochester, NY......................... 102 112 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 97 104 Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 106* Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 101 103 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 98 122* Knoxville, TN......................... 102 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 88* 97 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 110* 116* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 94* 109* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 91* 93* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 100 106* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 99 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 107* 123* Mobile, AL............................ 85* 91* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 103 100 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 120* 123* Ocala, FL............................. 85* 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 90* 96 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 87* 100 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 89* 107* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 111* 111* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 104 105 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 98 102 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 100 118* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 116* 123* Reading, PA........................... 95 106* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 97 104 Richmond, VA.......................... 98 103 Rochester, NY......................... 99 112* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 108 96 Iowa City, IA......................... 99 102 Johnstown, PA......................... 91* 88* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 106 102 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 108* 104 Knoxville, TN......................... 105 98 Lincoln, NE........................... 89* 91* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 121* 111* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 105 100 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 106 102 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 101 101 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 111 107* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 116* 108* Mobile, AL............................ 100 96* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 108* 103 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 122* 120* Ocala, FL............................. 99 94* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 94 92* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 107 91* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 101 91* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 104 110* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 112* 102 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 96 101 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 121* 110* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 108* 111* Reading, PA........................... 112* 105* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 111* 101 Richmond, VA.......................... 101 105* Rochester, NY......................... 103 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 93 95 Iowa City, IA......................... 108* 107 Johnstown, PA......................... 101 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 107 104 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 114* 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 86* 89* Lincoln, NE........................... 88* 98 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 116* 115* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 111* 97 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 98 104 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 97 100 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 114* 107 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 116* 109 Mobile, AL............................ 96 103 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 97 98 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 139* 120* Ocala, FL............................. 84* 111* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 107 112* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 94 96 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 96 108 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 111* 117* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 86* 108 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 102 101 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 121* 116* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 118* 116* Reading, PA........................... 107* 113* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 99 115* Richmond, VA.......................... 96 106 Rochester, NY......................... 103 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 95 98 Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 101 Johnstown, PA......................... 80* 89* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 99 100 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 91* 108* Knoxville, TN......................... 83* 99 Lincoln, NE........................... 84* 96 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 95* 107* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 94* 94* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 91* 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 89* 104 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 98 109* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 108* 111* Mobile, AL............................ 88* 104 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 95* 108* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 100 114* Ocala, FL............................. 87* 107* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81* 86* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 80* 111 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 101 109* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 93* 107 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 91* 103 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 92* 98 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 94* 102 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 104 109* Reading, PA........................... 96* 102 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 91* 102 Richmond, VA.......................... 96* 103 Rochester, NY......................... 93* 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Rockford, IL.......................... 103* 112 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 113* 131* Salinas, CA........................... 119* 145* San Antonio, TX....................... 95* 118* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 114* 136* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 124* 142* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 115* 130* Springfield, MA....................... 115* 128* Springfield, MO....................... 92* 106 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 107* 122* Tallahassee, FL....................... 96 105 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 98 114 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 95* 109 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 103* 135* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 113* 132* York-Hanover, PA...................... 101 133* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 100 126* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Rockford, IL.......................... 100 104* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 113* 119* Salinas, CA........................... 123* 125* San Antonio, TX....................... 95* 92* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 113* 123* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 121* 132* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 105* 126* Springfield, MA....................... 115* 113* Springfield, MO....................... 89* 92* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 103 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 88* 102 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93* 100 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93* 100 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 106 107* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 114* 112* York-Hanover, PA...................... 102 104* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 96* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Rockford, IL.......................... 104 99 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 111 110* Salinas, CA........................... 136* 117* San Antonio, TX....................... 102 95* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 111* 110* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 131* 125* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 120* 110* Springfield, MA....................... 116* 115* Springfield, MO....................... 97 90* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 102 104 Tallahassee, FL....................... 97 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 103 101 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 98 96* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 104 102 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 113* 117* York-Hanover, PA...................... 96 100 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 92* 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Rockford, IL.......................... 112* 104 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 106 121* Salinas, CA........................... 132* 112* San Antonio, TX....................... 102 107 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 116* 114* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 129* 120* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 115* 112* Springfield, MA....................... 114* 109 Springfield, MO....................... 81* 92* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 126* 116* Tallahassee, FL....................... 85* 92* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 102 99 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 88* 98 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 93* 94 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 105 120* York-Hanover, PA...................... 104 103 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 99 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Rockford, IL.......................... 96* 105 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 107 112* Salinas, CA........................... 96 107* San Antonio, TX....................... 92* 92* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 99 104 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 102 112* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 110* 115* Springfield, MA....................... 103 117* Springfield, MO....................... 87* 101 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 99 114* Tallahassee, FL....................... 88* 96 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88* 105 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 93* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 97 96 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 101 109* York-Hanover, PA...................... 91* 107* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 95* 114* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.