Title of planned report: |
Health Effects Analysis and Quantitative Risk Assessment for Crystalline Silica |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed standard for crystalline silica. Report contains evaluation of scientific evidence describing health effects associated with occupational exposure to crystalline silica, and presents quantitative estimates of health risks. |
Agency contact: |
Dorothy Dougherty, Director, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, (202) 693-2090 |
The report is likely to be: |
Influential scientific information ________
A highly influential scientific assessment: ___X____ |
Timing of the review: |
Anticipated completion August 2008. |
The peer review will be conducted by: |
A peer review panel _____
Individual letter reviews ___X__
An alternative procedure (describe) _____ |
Will the agency provide opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? |
Yes __X__
No ____
NA ____ |
If yes, how and when will these opportunities be provided? |
Anticipate requesting written comment on draft report at a time to be announced later, and subsequently holding a public meeting. |
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? |
Yes __X___
No _____ |
Anticipated number of reviewers: |
3 or fewer _______
4-10 ___X____
More than 10 _______ |
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: |
Epidemiology, biostatistics and risk assessment, animal and cellular toxicology, occupational medicine |
Reviewers will be selected by: |
The agency ______
A designated outside organization ___X___ |
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? |
Yes ______
No ___X___ |
2. |
|
Title of planned report: |
Models and Data Supporting the Preliminary Economic Analysis of Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed standard for crystalline silica. Report contains evaluations of necessary engineering controls, costs, benefits, and economic impacts associated with alternative rules for occupational exposure to crystalline silica, and presents estimates of costs, benefits, and economic impacts. Information on timing, opportunity for public comment and participation, and the number of peer reviewers and their expertise will be provided at a later date. |
Agency contact: |
Keith Goddard, Director, Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis, (202) 693-2400 |
The report is likely to be: |
Influential scientific information ________
A highly influential scientific assessment: ___X____ |
Timing of the review: |
________________ |
The peer review will be conducted by: |
A peer review panel _____
Individual letter reviews _____
An alternative procedure (describe) _____ |
Will the agency provide opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? |
Yes ____
No ____
NA ____ |
If yes, how and when will these opportunities be provided? |
|
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? |
Yes _____
No _____ |
Anticipated number of reviewers: |
3 or fewer _______
4-10 _______
More than 10 _______ |
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: |
|
Reviewers will be selected by: |
The agency ______
A designated outside organization ______ |
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? |
Yes ______
No ______ |
3. |
|
Title of planned report: |
Models and Data Supporting the Preliminary Economic Analysis of Revisions to OSHA's Walking and Working Surfaces and Personal Fall Protection Systems Standards (Subparts D and I) |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed revisions to Subpart D and I. Report contains evaluations of necessary engineering controls, costs, benefits, and economic impacts associated with alternative rules for revision to Subparts D and I, and presents estimates of costs, benefits, and economic impacts. |
Agency contact: |
Keith Goddard, Director, Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis, (202) 693-2400 |
The report is likely to be: |
Influential scientific information ___X____
A highly influential scientific assessment: _______ |
Timing of the review: |
Anticipated completion August 2008. |
The peer review will be conducted by: |
A peer review panel _____
Individual letter reviews __X___
An alternative procedure (describe) _____ |
Will the agency provide opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? |
Yes ____
No __X__
NA ____ |
If yes, how and when will these opportunities be provided? |
|
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? |
Yes _____
No __X___ |
Anticipated number of reviewers: |
3 or fewer ___X____
4-10 _______
More than 10 _______ |
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: |
Economics |
Reviewers will be selected by: |
The agency ______
A designated outside organization ___X___ |
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? |
Yes ______
No __X____ |
4. |
|
Title of planned report: |
Models and Data supporting the Preliminary Economic Analysis of Occupational Exposure to Diacetyl and Flavorings Containing Diacetyl |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed standard for controlling occupational exposure to diacetyl and flavoring containing diacetyl. Report contains evaluations of necessary costs, benefits, and economic impacts associated with this proposed standard. |
Agency contact: |
Keith Goddard, Director, Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis, (202) 693-2400 |
The report is likely to be: |
Influential scientific information ___X_____
A highly influential scientific assessment: _______ |
Timing of the review: |
Anticipated Completion Date To Be Determined |
The peer review will be conducted by: |
A peer review panel _____
Individual letter reviews __X__
An alternative procedure (describe) _____ |
Will the agency provide opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? |
Yes ____
No __X__
NA ____ |
If yes, how and when will these opportunities be provided? |
|
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? |
Yes _____
No __X__ |
Anticipated number of reviewers: |
3 or fewer ___X___
4-10 _______
More than 10 _______ |
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: |
Economics |
Reviewers will be selected by: |
The agency ______
A designated outside organization ___X___ |
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? |
Yes _____
No __X__ |
5. |
|
Title of planned report: |
Health Effects Evaluation and Risk Assessment for Food Flavorings Containing Diacetyl |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed standard for occupational exposure to food flavorings containing diacetyl. Report contains an evaluation of the scientific evidence for material health impairment associated with occupational exposure to these flavorings and an analysis of risk. |
Agency contact: |
Dorothy Dougherty, Director, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, (202) 693-2090 |
The report is likely to be: |
Influential scientific information ___X_____
A highly influential scientific assessment: _______ |
Timing of the review: |
Anticipated Completion Date To Be Determined |
The peer review will be conducted by: |
A peer review panel _____
Individual letter reviews ___X__
An alternative procedure (describe) _____ |
Will the agency provide opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? |
Yes ____
No _X___
NA ____ |
If yes, how and when will these opportunities be provided? |
|
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? |
Yes _____
No __X___ |
Anticipated number of reviewers: |
3 or fewer ____X__
4-10 _______
More than 10 _______ |
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: |
Epidemiology, occupational medicine, toxicology, risk assessment |
Reviewers will be selected by: |
The agency ______
A designated outside organization ___X___ |
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? |
Yes ______
No __X____ |
6. |
|
Title of planned report: |
Health Effects Analysis and Quantitative Risk Assessment for Beryllium |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed standard for beryllium. Report contains evaluation of scientific evidence describing health effects associated with occupational exposure to beryllium, and presents quantitative estimates of health risks. |
Agency contact: |
Dorothy Dougherty, Director, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, (202) 693-2090 |
The report is likely to be: |
Influential scientific information ___X_____
A highly influential scientific assessment: _______ |
Timing of the review: |
Anticipated Completion November 2008 |
The peer review will be conducted by: |
A peer review panel _____
Individual letter reviews ___X__
An alternative procedure (describe) _____ |
Will the agency provide opportunities for the public to comment on the work product to be peer reviewed? |
Yes ____
No _X___
NA ____ |
If yes, how and when will these opportunities be provided? |
|
Will the agency provide significant and relevant public comments to the peer reviewers before they conduct their review? |
Yes _____
No __X___ |
Anticipated number of reviewers: |
3 or fewer ____X__
4-10 _______
More than 10 _______ |
Primary disciplines or expertise needed in the review: |
Epidemiology, biostatistics and risk assessment, toxicology, occupational medicine |
Reviewers will be selected by: |
The agency ___X___
A designated outside organization ______ |
Will the public, including scientific or professional societies, be asked to nominate potential peer reviewers? |
Yes ______
No __X____ |
Completed Peer Reviews |
1. |
|
Title |
Models and Data Supporting the Preliminary Economic and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Cranes and Derricks |
Subject and purpose: |
Development of proposed standard for cranes and derricks rule. Report contains evaluations of necessary engineering controls, costs, benefits, and economic impacts associated with alternative revisions to cranes and derricks, and presents estimates of costs, benefits, and economic impacts. The results of the peer review will be made available to the public when a proposed rule is published. |
Agency contact: |
Keith Goddard, Director, Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis, (202) 693-2400 |