Skip main navigation.
U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans - Link to ED.gov Home Page
ESRA: Comprehensive Centers - FY 2006

Program Goal: To improve student achievement in low-performing schools under the No Child Left Behind Act.
Objective 1 of 2: Improve the quality of technical assistance.
Indicator 1.1 of 2: High quality: The percentage of products and services that are deemed to be of high quality by an independent review panel of qualified stakeholders.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The percentage of Comprehensive Centers' products and services that are deemed to be of high quality by an independent review panel of qualified stakeholders.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2006
 
999
2007
 
999
2008
 
999
2009
 
999
2010
 
999

Source: Reviews by independent review panel.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2006

Data Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED.
 
Explanation: The FY 2006 target is to establish a baseline. This is a long-term measure with the following targets: 2007 baseline plus 1 percent, 2008 baseline plus 2 percent, 2009 baseline plus 3 percent, and 2010 baseline plus 4 percent.
 
Indicator 1.2 of 2: High relevance: The percentage of products and services deemed to be of high relevance to educational practice by an independent review panel of qualified practitioners.
 
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: The percentage of Comprehensive Centers' products and services deemed to be of high relevance to educational practice by an independent review panel of qualified practitioners.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2006
 
999
2007
 
999
2008
 
999
2009
 
999
2010
 
999

Source: Reviews by independent review panel.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2006

Data Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED.
 
Explanation: The FY 2006 target is to establish a baseline. This is a long-term measure with the following targets: 2007 baseline plus 1 percent, 2008 baseline plus 2 percent, 2009 baseline plus 3 percent, and 2010 baseline plus 4 percent.
 
Objective 2 of 2: Technical assistance products and services will be used to improve results for children in the target areas.
Indicator 2.1 of 1: Use: The percentage of technical assistance services that are deemed to be of high relevance to educational policy or practice by an independent review panel of qualified practioners.
 
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: The percentage of all Comprehensive Centers' technical assistance services that are deemed to be of high usefulness to educational policy or practice by target audiences.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2006
 
999
2007
 
999
2008
 
999
2009
 
999
2010
 
999

Source: Source information will be based upon a survey of target audiences.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2006

Data Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED.
 
Explanation: The FY2006 target is to establish a baseline. This is a long-term measure with the following targets: 2007 baseline plus 1 percent, 2008 baseline plus 2 percent, 2009 baseline plus 3 percent, and 2010 baseline plus 4 percent.
 


Return to table of contents

Last Modified: 12/28/2005