Skip Navigation

What Works Clearinghouse


Dropout Prevention
Dropout Prevention
September 2008

Appendices


Appendix A1 Extent of evidence

Intervention name Staying in school Progressing in school Completing school
Number of studies Sample size (schools/
students)
Extent of evidence1 Number of studies Sample size (schools/
students)
Extent of evidence1 Number of studies Sample size (schools/
students)
Extent of evidence1
Accelerated Middle Schools 3 14/848 Medium to large 3 14/848 Medium to large 0 0 na
ALAS (Achievement for Latinos through Academic Success) 1 1/94 Small 1 1/81 Small 0 0 na
Career Academies 1 9/345 Small 1 9/316 Small 1 9/360 Small
Check & Connect 2 nr/238 Small 1 nr/92 Small 1 nr/144 Small
Financial Incentives for Teen Parents to Stay in School 2 nr/1,819 Medium to large 1 nr/913 Small 2 nr/1,819 Medium to large
First Things First 1 16/nr Small 0 0 na 0 0 na
High School Redirection 3 3/1,634 Medium to large 2 2/732 Medium to large 3 3/1,510 Medium to large
Job Corps 0 0 na 1 105/11,313 Small 1 105/8,597 Small
JOBSTART 0 0 na 0 0 na 1 13/1,941 Small
Middle College High School 1 1/394 Small 0 0 na 1 1/394 Small
New Chance 0 0 na 0 0 na 1 16/2,079 Small
Project GRAD 0 0 na 1 13/nr Small 1 13/nr Small
Quantum Opportunity Program 0 0 na 1 11/766 Small 1 11/915 Small
Talent Development High Schools 0 0 na 1 11/nr Small 0 0 na
Talent Search 0 0 na 0 0 na 2 200+/9,854 Medium to large
Twelve Together 1 9/219 Small 1 9/219 Small 0 0 na

na = not applicable
nr = not reported

1 A rating of "medium to large" requires at least two studies and two schools across studies in one domain and a total sample size across studies of at least 350 students or 14 classrooms. Otherwise, the rating is "small."

Top

Appendix A2 Targeted population

Intervention name Students targeted by the intervention Students in reviewed studies same as full target population?
Accelerated Middle Schools Middle school students who are behind grade level Yes
ALAS (Achievement for Latinos through Academic Success) Middle school students deemed at risk of dropping out; served throughout their three years of middle or junior high school Yes
Career Academies High school students; program originally served only at-risk students; now serves a more general student population No. Studies reviewed focused only on at-risk students.
Check & Connect Middle and high school students deemed at risk of dropping out; served throughout their time in middle or high school No. Studies reviewed focused only on high school students.
Financial Incentives for Teen Parents to Stay in School Teen parents receiving cash assistance Yes
First Things First Students in elementary, middle, and high schools serving significant proportions of economically disadvantaged students No. Studies reviewed focused only on high school students.
High School Redirection High school students who have dropped out or are considered at risk of dropping out Yes
Job Corps Economically disadvantaged youth, most of whom lack a high school diploma or GED certificate Yes
JOBSTART Young disadvantaged high school dropouts Yes
Middle College High School High school students who have dropped out or are considered at risk of dropping out Yes
New Chance Young welfare mothers without a high school diploma or GED certificate Yes
Project GRAD Serves all students in a participating high school, as well as its feeder elementary and middle schools No. Studies reviewed focused only on high school students.
Quantum Opportunity Program Students from high schools with high dropout rates; support provided for four to five years beginning in the ninth grade Yes
Talent Development High Schools School-wide reform serving all students in a participating high school Yes
Talent Search Low-income middle and high school students; middle and high school students whose parents did not earn high school degrees No. Studies reviewed focused only on high school students.
Twelve Together Middle and early high school students; serves a mix of those at high risk of academic failure as well as those at lower risk; services provided for one year No. Studies reviewed focused only on middle school students.

Top

Appendix A3 Characteristics of interventions

Intervention name Academic approach Support services
Accelerated Middle Schools An additional year of curriculum is covered during a student’s one to two years in the intervention Small class sizes, tutoring, attendance monitoring, counseling, and family outreach
ALAS (Achievement for Latinos through Academic Success) Regular school curriculum supplemented with special classes on problem-solving skills Close monitoring of attendance, regular feedback to parents and students on performance, case management, and counseling
Career Academies School-within-a-school approach operating within a regular high school; coursework organized around a career theme Internships and mentors from local employers that reinforce the specific career theme of the academy
Check & Connect Regular school curriculum supplemented with tutoring as needed Close monitoring of attendance, mentoring, case management, and family outreach
Financial Incentives for Teen Parents to Stay in School Does not include an academic component Bonuses and sanctions applied to the welfare grant to encourage school attendance and improved academic performance; case management
First Things First Theme-based small learning communities, family and student advocate system, and instructional improvements Students assigned an advocate, typically one of their teachers, who serves as a mentor and a liaison between the school and the student’s family
High School Redirection Alternative high school model focusing on basic skills acquisition, remedial reading instruction, and accelerated credit accumulation Onsite child care, limited extracurricular activities
Job Corps Remedial education, GED preparation, vocational training, job placement assistance Residential living services, counseling, health services, social-skills training, and a biweekly living allowance
JOBSTART Basic academic skills instruction, GED preparation, occupational skills training, job placement assistance Training-related support services, such as transportation assistance and childcare
Middle College High School Alternative high school operating on a college campus; college-preparatory curriculum emphasizing individualized attention and the development of critical thinking skills Community service opportunities, internships, peer support, and specialized counseling
New Chance GED preparation classes and a parenting and life skills curriculum, followed by occupational training and job placement assistance Case management and child care
Project GRAD Model uses regular school curriculum at the high school level; includes curriculum reforms at the elementary and middle school level focused on reading and math instruction College scholarships for students performing well academically, six-week academic summer program on a college campus, counseling on college preparation and admissions
Quantum Opportunity Program Regular school curriculum supplemented with tutoring, computer-assisted learning, and life skills instruction Case management, mentoring, transportation assistance, child care, and financial incentives to promote participation
Talent Development High Schools School restructured into small "learning communities," curriculum emphasizes college preparation and reading and math instruction Ongoing technical assistance and professional development for school staff
Talent Search Regular school curriculum supplemented with tutoring and study skills assistance Career exploration, aptitude assessment, academic advising, college campus visits, college and financial aid application assistance, assistance with preparing for college entrance exams
Twelve Together Regular school curriculum supplemented with homework assistance Weekly peer support sessions led by trained adult facilitators, college campus visits, social events

Top

Appendix A4 Summary of statistically significant1 or substantively important2 positive findings

Intervention name Staying in school Progressing in school Completing school
Positive findings Findings across outcomes Positive findings Findings across outcomes Positive findings Findings across outcomes
Accelerated Middle Schools
Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998—Georgia study (randomized control trial with differential attrition) Dropped out of school ns, Substantively
important
Highest grade completed after two years Statistically significant,
Substantively important
na na
Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998—New Jersey study (randomized control trial) None ns, nsi Highest grade completed after two years Statistically significant,
Substantively important
na na
Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998—Michigan study (randomized control trial with differential attrition) Dropped out of school Statistically significant,
Substantively important
Highest grade completed after two years Statistically significant,
Substantively important
na na
ALAS (Achievement for Latinos through Academic Success)
Larson & Rumberger, 2005 (randomized controlled trial) Enrollment: end of grade 9 Statistically significant, Substantively important On track to graduate on time: end of 9th grade Statistically significant, Substantively important na na
Career Academies
Kemple, 2004 (randomized controlled trial) Dropped out of school Statistically significant, Substantively important Total credits earned Credits earned met graduation requirements Statistically significant, Substantively important None ns, nsi
Check & Connect
Sinclair, Christenson, Evelo, & Hurley, 1998 (randomized controlled trial) Dropped out of school Statistically significant, Substantively important Credits earned Statistically significant, Substantively important None ns, nsi
Sinclair, Christenson, & Thurlow, 2005 (randomized controlled trial with attrition problems) Dropped out of school Statistically significant, Substantively important na na None ns, nsi
Financial Incentives for Teen Parents to Stay in School
Long, Gueron, Wood, Fisher, & Fellerath, 1996 (randomized controlled trial) None ns, nsi None ns, nsi None ns, nsi
Mauldon, Malvin, Stiles, Nicosia, & Seto, 2000 (randomized controlled trial with attrition problems) Dropped out of school Statistically significant, nsi na na None ns, nsi
First Things First
Quint, Bloom, Black, & Stephens, 2005—Houston study (quasi-experimental design) None ns, nsi na na na na
High School Redirection
Dynarski & Wood, 1997—Stockton study (randomized controlled trial with control group crossover) Number of days enrolled: year 1 Number of days enrolled: year 2 Statistically significant, Substantively important Total credits earned: end of year 4 Statistically significant, Substantively important None ns, nsi
Dynarski & Wood, 1997—Wichita study (randomized controlled trial) None ns, nsi None ns, nsi None ns, nsi
Dynarski & Wood, 1997—Cincinnati study (randomized controlled trial) None ns, nsi na na None ns, nsi
Job Corps
Schochet, Burghardt, & Glazerman, 2001 (randomized control trial) na na None na, nsi Earned a high school
diploma/GED
Statistically significant,
Substantively important
JOBSTART
Cave, Bos, Doolittle, & Toussaint, 1993 (randomized control trial) na na na na Earned a high school
diploma/GED
Statistically significant,
Substantively important
Middle College High School
Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998 (randomized controlled trial) None ns, nsi na na None ns, nsi
New Chance
Quint, Bos, & Polit, 1997 (randomized control trial) na na na na Earned a high school
diploma/GED
Statistically significant, nsi
Project GRAD
Snipes, Holton, Doolittle, & Sztejnberg, 2006 (quasi-experimental design) na na None ns, nsi None ns, nsi
Quantum Opportunity Program
Schirm, Stuart & McKie, 2006 (randomized controlled trial with differential attrition) na na None ns, nsi None ns, nsi
Talent Development High Schools
Kemple, Herlihy, & Smith, 2005 (quasi-experimental design) na na Total credits earned: end of year 2
Enrolled in 10th grade: end of year 2
Statistically significant, nsi na na
Talent Search
Constantine, Seftor, Martin, Silva, & Myers, 2006—Texas study (quasi-experimental design) na na na na Earned high school diploma/GED Statistically significant, Substantively important
Constantine, Seftor, Martin, Silva, & Myers, 2006—Florida study (quasi-experimental design) na na na na Earned high school diploma/GED Statistically significant, Substantively important
Twelve Together
Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998 (randomized controlled trial with differential attrition) Dropped out of school ns, Substantively important None ns, nsi na na

ns = not statistically significant
nsi = not substantively important
na = not studied

1According to WWC criteria, if a program finds a statistically significant effect, there is less than a 5% chance that this difference is due to chance. The level of statistical significance was calculated by the WWC and, where necessary, corrects for clustering within classrooms or schools and for multiple comparisons. For an explanation about the clustering comparison, see the WWC Tutorial on Mismatch. For the formulas the WWC used to calculate statistical significance, see the Technical Details of WWC-Conducted Computations.
2For rating purposes, the WWC considered the statistical significance of the findings and the magnitude of the effect, also called the effect size. An average effect size is the sum of all the effect sizes of the student outcomes in a study in a single domain divided by the number of those outcomes. The WWC considers an average effect size across all student outcomes in one study in a given domain to be substantively important if it is equal to or greater than 0.25.

Top


PO Box 2393
Princeton, NJ 08543-2393
Phone: 1-866-503-6114