Application Technology for Injecting Telone
Application Technology for Injecting Telone
Current reductions of methyl bromide and the eventual loss of the gas
fumigant in 2005 have prompted a lot of research in a relatively short period
of time. Researchers have conducted numerous studies to find a chemical or
chemical combination to replace methyl bromide. In the meantime, some
researchers are exploring new ways to use existing chemical fumigants.
Telone is an effective fumigant against nematodes and soilborne disease and,
when combined with an herbicide, it can approximate the control of methyl
bromide. However, regulations that govern personal protection equipment and
buffer zones make its use prohibitive for some.
John Mirusso, fumigation consultant to Dow AgroSciences, developed a piece of farm
equipment that injects Telone into the soil and slows its escape. Mirusso
contacted Yetter Farm Equipment of
Illinois 2 years ago to discuss modifications to a coulter assembly to
accommodate soil injections of Telone. "John told us he needed a piece of
equipment that could handle field residues from previous crops and inject a
fumigant to a depth of 12 inches, with minimal soil disturbance," recounts
Mark Seipel, regional sales manager for Yetter.
Yetter, a 71-year-old business, focuses mostly on equipment for use in the
Corn Belt. Seipel says, "Our equipment, historically, is used for
conservation tillage and fertilizer placement, but grower needs are changing.
Telone injection is a new avenue we are pursuing due to the methyl bromide
phaseout. The market is changing so changes in technology and application are
needed."
The new 2986 coulter 30-inch Avenger, took several months of development by
Mirusso, the Yetter company, and Jerry Nance, Dow AgroSciences' Telone
specialist. "It features, as indicated in its name, a 30-inch coulter that
allows for fumigant application up to 12 inches, as compared to 6 inches with a
standard Yetter coulter," says weed scientist James Gilreath of the
University of Florida's Gulf Coast
Research and Education Center, Bradenton.
"We looked at a lot of equipment before settling on the 2986 coulter
30-inch Avenger," says Nance. "The emissions are very low, so using
the rig makes fumigating the field a one-person job. This significantly affects
growers, who must use personal protection equipment when fumigating."
Sealing devices were added to the knives that follow the coulter. The knife
has a tube in the back side that delivers the fumigant to the bottom of the
groove. The beaver tail is angled so it compacts or presses a bit of soil about
3 inches from the bottom of the chisel groove. "This keeps the fumigant
from moving rapidly up the groove and dissipating into the atmosphere,"
explains Gilreath.
Following each coulter assembly is a set of press wheels that presses the
soil surface to seal the knife and coulter groove at the surface. The amount of
force applied to them is adjustable.
"One can use chisels without the coulter," Gilreath says. But he
cautions, "If there is tying string or plastic mulch residue in the soil,
it gets hung up on the chisels and can be dragged around. This results in
chisel grooves substantially larger than the chisel itself, and this allows
rapid outgassing of fumigant."
According to Nance, this is definitely not what a grower wants. "You
want the chemical in the ground to do its job and then degrade. What escapes is
unused and useless product."
It also contributes to air emissions that can affect the size of buffer
zones. "Air emissions are measured to help determine buffer zones. If the
fumigant does not escape into the air, then neighbors are not exposed to the
fumigant," says Peter Caulkins, associate director of
EPA's Registration Division.
So far, the amount of outgassing is low, according to Mirusso. "The
numbers look great and the Telone is expanding out at the depth of injection,
which increases effectiveness."
These types of innovative collaborations will have to continue to adjust to
life without methyl bromide. "Agriculture is going through tremendous
changes now and modifications are necessary. The best products are made with
input from our consumersthe farmers," says Seipel.
[January 2001 Table of Contents]
[Newsletter Issues
Listing] [Methyl
Bromide Home Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]
Last Updated: March 22, 2001
|