X. Public Information Act Distinguished from Certain Other Statutes
X. Public Information Act Distinguished from Certain Other Statutes
A. Authority of the Attorney General to Issue Attorney General Opinions
The attorney general has authority pursuant to article IV, section 22, of the Texas Constitution
and sections 402.041 through 402.045 of the Government Code to issue legal opinions to certain
public officers. These officers are identified in sections 402.042 and 402.043 of the
Government Code. The attorney general may not give legal advice or a written opinion to any
other person. (260)
On the other hand, the Public Information Act requires a governmental body to request a ruling
from the attorney general if it receives a written request for records that it believes to be within
an exception set out in subchapter C of the Act, sections 552.101 through 552.1425, and there
has not been a previous determination about whether the information falls within the
exception. (261) Thus, all governmental bodies have a duty to request a ruling from the attorney
general under the circumstances set out in section 552.301. A much smaller group of public
officers has discretionary authority to request attorney general opinions pursuant to chapter 402
of the Government Code. A school district, for example, is a governmental body that must
request open records rulings as required by section 552.301 of the Public Information Act, but
has no authority to seek legal advice on other matters from the attorney general. (262)
Additionally, the Public Information Act gives the attorney general the authority to issue written
decisions and opinions in order to maintain uniformity in the application, operation and
interpretation of the Act. (263)
B. Texas Open Meetings Act
The Public Information Act, Government Code chapter 552, and the Open Meetings Act,
Government Code chapter 551, both serve the purpose of opening government to the people.
However, they operate differently, and each has a different set of exceptions. The exceptions
in the Public Information Act do not furnish a basis for holding executive session meetings to
discuss confidential records. (264) Nor does the mere fact that a document was discussed in an
executive session make it confidential under the Public Information Act. (265) Since the Open
Meetings Act has no provision comparable to section 552.301 of the Public Information Act,
the attorney general may address questions about the Open Meetings Act only when such
questions are submitted by a public officer with authority to request attorney general opinions
pursuant to chapter 402 of the Government Code. (A companion volume to this handbook, the
Open Meetings Handbook, is also available from the Office of the Attorney General.)
C. Discovery Proceedings
The Public Information Act differs in purpose from statutes and procedural rules providing for
discovery of documents in administrative and judicial proceedings. (266) The Act's exceptions to
required public disclosure do not create privileges from discovery of documents in
administrative or judicial proceedings. (267) Furthermore, information that might be privileged
from discovery is not necessarily protected from required public disclosure under the Act. (268)
Endnotes
260. Gov't Code § 402.045.
261. Id. § 552.301(a); see Open Records Decision No. 673 (2001) (defining previous determination).
262. See generally Attorney General Opinion DM-20 at 3-6 (1991).
263. Gov't Code § 552.011.
264. See Attorney General Opinion JM-595 at 4 (1986).
265. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, 22 S.W.3d 351, 367 (Tex. 2000); Open Records Decision No. 485
at 9-10 (1987); see also Open Records Decision No. 605 at 2-3 (1992).
266. Attorney General Opinion JM-1048 at 2 (1989); Open Records Decision Nos. 551 at 4 (1990), 108 (1975).
267. Gov't Code § 552.005.
268. See Open Records Decision No. 575 at 2 (discovery privileges not confidentiality provisions for the purpose of
Gov't Code § 552.101). But see Open Records Decision Nos. 677 (2002) (analyzing the work product privilege
in the context of the Act), 676 (2002) (analyzing the attorney-client privilege in the context of the Act). For a
discussion of the attorney-client privilege, see pages 59 and 83 of this handbook. For a discussion of the work-product privilege, see pages 77 and 106 of this handbook.
Revised: March 15 2004
echo date( 'F d, Y', filemtime($_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME']));?>
|