Acquisition Criteria

From eotcd

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Acquisition Criteria: Metrics Focus Group (April 2010)

This is a summary of the findings of the metrics focus group with project SMEs in April 2010.

Essential Requirements

Informed acquisition decisions have two essential requirements:

  1. Standard data elements for comparable material types
  2. For networked electronic resources, counts based on IP addresses for:
    • Specific pages and collections accessed
    • Specific files/materials retrieved

Selection Criteria

  1. Broadness of applicability
    • Scope or breadth of material coverage to serve the “broadest possible group of users”
    • Promotes buy-in from multiple departments
  2. Usage Data
    • Generally vendor provided
    • Vendor compliance with standards needed
  3. Number of titles
    • A measure of the volume or amount of materials
  4. Unique Content
    • Number of unique items in the archive, that is, materials not available elsewhere
  5. Duplicate Content
    • The “titles” (or materials) in the existing collection that are duplicated
  6. Appropriateness for Collection
    • Particularly in regard to the degree of “completeness” needed for in a particular subject

Metrics that Drive Acquisitions

  • Selection Decisions: Usage data (when available)
  • Retention Decisions: Cost per use

ARL SPEC Kit 316: Evaluating E-resources (July 2010)

Reference: Richard Bleiler & Jill Livington. (July 2010). ARL SPEC Kit 316: Evaluating E-resources. [1]

Survey of 124 ARL member institutions in Feb/Mar 2010. Response rate was 59% (N = 73). Measured the criteria libraries use to evaluate e-resources for acquisition (purchasing/licensing) and renewal. The criteria were measured for both consortia and individual library decisions. Overall, findings were the same for both.

Selection Criteria:

  1. Deal Breaker
    1. Cost
    2. Compatibility with existing library systems (NOTE: Distant second)
  2. Most Highly Rated
    • Uniqueness/completeness of content
    • Relevance to faculty research
    • Anticipated usage rate
    • User-friendly interface
  3. Least Important
    • E-resource's potential accessibility through mobile devices

Renewal Criteria:

  1. Deal Breaker
    1. Cost
  2. Most Highly Rated
    • Uniqueness of content
    • Relevance to current curriculum & faculty research
    • Inflation history
    • Cost per use (NOTE: Only for consortia)