Publications & Outputs

Frodeman, R; Parker, J. "Intellectual Merit and Broadre Impact: The National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion and the Question of Peer Review," Social Epistemology, v.23, 2009, p. 337.

Holbrook, J Britt. "The Use of Societal Impacts Considerations in Grant Proposal Peer Review: A Comparison of Five Models," Technology and Innovation, v.12, 2010, p. 213.

Frodeman, Robert and Holbrook, J Britt. "NSF's Struggle to Articulate Relevance," Science, v.333, 2011, p. 157.

Holbrook, J Britt. "Accountable Science: The COMPETES Act Needs to Demonstrate an Accountability Attitude," Science Progress, 2010.

Frodeman, Robert and Holbrook, J Britt. "NSF and Public Accountability: New, More Prescriptive Merit Criteria May Hinder Science Progress," Science Progress, 2011.

Holbrook, J Britt and Frodeman, Robert. "Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts," Research Evaluation, v.20, 2011, p. 239.

Frodeman, Robert and Briggle, Adam. "The Dedisciplining of Peer Review," Minerva, v.50, 2011, p. 3.

Holbrook, J. Britt and Frodeman, Robert. "Science: For Science's or Society's Sake?," Science Progress, 2012.

Holbrook, J. Britt and Frodeman, Robert. "Resistance to impact criteria can lead to a tightening of the accountability noose," London School of Economics Impact of Social Sciences Blog, 2012.

Holbrook, J. Britt. "Re-assessing the science - society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's broader impacts merit review criterion (1997 - 2011)," UNT Scholarly Works, 2012.