The Economist explains: Who can vote in Scotland's independence referendum
The Economist explains
On September 18th, Scotland will vote on whether or not to leave the United Kingdom. But not all Scots will have a say
On this blog, our correspondents explain subjects both topical and timeless, profound and peculiar, with The Economist's trademark clarity and brevity
The Economist explains: Who can vote in Scotland's independence referendum
The Economist explains
Digital advertising: Tracking the trackers: Every click you make
Newsbook
Vietnam v Iraq: Suicide attacks changed everything
Democracy in America
The week ahead: September 11th 2014: Scotland decides
Newsbook
Dinosaurs: Lost in fire, found in water
Babbage
September 11th-related illnesses: Still clouded by dust
Democracy in America
Investing: Revenge of the active manager
Buttonwood's notebook
Have you listened to The Economist Radio on Facebook?
The Economist Radio is an on-demand social listening platform that allows you to listen, share and recommend The Economist audio content
Test your EQ
Take our weekly news quiz to stay on top of the headlines
In Other Words
Try our new audio app and website, providing reporting and analysis from our correspondents around the world every weekday
Want more from The Economist?
Visit The Economist e-store and you’ll find a range of carefully selected products for business and pleasure, Economist books and diaries, and much more
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
In the United States, citizens residing abroad can vote in federal elections. There are other countries which allow absent citizens to vote on national questions.
No special voting rights for Canadians who are members of le Parti Quebecquois?
Quite.
We'll all retain United Kingdom and European Union citizenship anyway - there are few implications for individuals, except in the potential for long term policy divergence.
Voting rights are always based on residency at the time of the election - that is true for all levels of election (local authorities, Westminster, Scottish Parliament, European parliament, referendums). It's a longstanding convention in the UK (and most other countries that hold elections).
It is understandable that many excluded people want a voice. But practically, where else could the line be drawn but by residency? It is simply easiest (and most secure) to proceed based on registered address and the electoral register.