Peer review and scientific publishing
Top story
-
Who governs science?
15 Aug 2014: Stephen Curry: Traditionally, science holds itself to account through peer review. But more openness in these procedures may be needed to sustain public trust
Most recent
-
-
14 Jul 2014: Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky: Journal publishers must acknowledge the limitations of traditional peer review and fully embrace post-publication peer review
-
-
6 Jul 2014:
Editorial: Nature and the BMJ, like all serious scientific journals, rely on peer review to establish the authority of the papers they publish, and peer review, it appears, is less reliable than it sounds
-
28 Jun 2014: Devices purported to identify and cure hepatitis and HIV set to be put to use have been delayed citing 'further testing'
-
-
4 Jun 2014: Astronomers who thought they had detected echoes of the big bang may have only seen the effects of space dust
-
28 May 2014: Pete Etchells: A recent push for replicability in psychology has been sullied by unfounded ad hominem attacks and accusations of bullying. But there is a positive side to the whole debate
-
-
20 May 2014: Chris Chambers: Moves to uphold transparency are making psychology more scientific
-
16 May 2014: Decision not to publish paper in Environmental Research Letters had nothing to do with 'activism' of peer reviewers
-
-
17 Apr 2014: Another journal bans research funded by the tobacco industry. It's time to stop treating us like idiots
-
6 Apr 2014:
A vast database of dissertations is making available texts that would otherwise remain buried in desk drawers or dead hard drives, writes James Bridle
-
1-15 of 174 for Peer review and scientific publishing