- The first part is at http://storify.com/ernestopriego/scholnet-research-trends-and-the-elsevier-labs-p … Tweets are likely to be missing as Storify/Twitter could not deal fast enough with so many API calls. If your tweet is missing it's nothing personal, I just dragged and dropped the results Storify gave me. Thanks for reading and sharing if you find it useful.
- @ResearchTrendy thanks for the great #scholnet and insightful speakers: @gthorisson @mrgunn @SSRN @researchremix @kelli_barr Dr. Frey...
http://twitter.com/ElsevierConnect/status/293773983042650112
— Elsevier Connect (@ElsevierConnect)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:35:50 - @kelli_barr @researchremix @jasonpriem Not as simple as claiming that impact on public *IS* scholarly impact. Ambiguity important. #scholnet
http://twitter.com/jbrittholbrook/status/293773956119396356
— J Britt Holbrook (@jbrittholbrook)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:35:43 - TY my twitterees for patience with #scholnet note-taking all morning.
http://twitter.com/DanaMcFarland/status/293773534306639873
— Dana (@DanaMcFarland)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:34:03 - Thanks @ResearchTrendy for #scholnet - great job!
http://twitter.com/SSRN/status/293773372440072192
— SSRN (@SSRN)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:33:24 - @ResearchTrendy thank you for organising the seminar! Will write-up post about it and share the link when it's live. #scholnet
http://twitter.com/ernestopriego/status/293773236829839360
— Ernesto Priego (@ernestopriego)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:32:52 - Thanks for organizing the webinar, #scholnet!
http://twitter.com/researchremix/status/293773153195409408
— Heather Piwowar (@researchremix)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:32:32 http://twitter.com/ernestopriego/status/293772980729806849
— Ernesto Priego (@ernestopriego)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:31:51- Excellent job by @reserachtrendy team! Very stimulating web seminar #scholnet
http://twitter.com/kelli_barr/status/293772788681035777
— Kelli Barr (@kelli_barr)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:31:05 http://twitter.com/ernestopriego/status/293772780489560065
— Ernesto Priego (@ernestopriego)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:31:03- Group of #altmetrics research papers on Mendeley (contribute if you know of others!): http://www.mendeley.com/groups/586171/altmetrics/ …coscholnet/586171/altmetrics/ #scholnet
http://twitter.com/researchremix/status/293772607935881216
— Heather Piwowar (@researchremix)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:30:22 - @ernestopriego Thanks for the links, good reading for us all #scholnet
http://twitter.com/ResearchTrendy/status/293772600117710848
— Research Trends (@ResearchTrendy)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:30:20 - Proud of @kelli_barr for her presentation in #scholnet. Not only interesting, but also assertive.
http://twitter.com/jbrittholbrook/status/293772467305054209
— J Britt Holbrook (@jbrittholbrook)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:29:48 - @JournalAdvisor Our pleasure, thanks for coming! #scholnet
http://twitter.com/ResearchTrendy/status/293772341207502848
— Research Trends (@ResearchTrendy)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:29:18 - And it's now almost 230am in Japan, time for bed. Thanks @ResearchTrendy for the great webinar! #scholnet
http://twitter.com/JournalAdvisor/status/293772050294792193
— Edanz JournalAdvisor (@JournalAdvisor)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:28:09 - now we're getting to the core of it! we have to find out what altmetrics mean: WHY are people bookmarking? #scholnet
http://twitter.com/sh2106/status/293771843427524610
— Stefanie Haustein (@sh2106)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:27:20 - If someone is still out there at #scholnet please do click to read our posts exploring qualitative #altmetrics http://altmetric.com/blog/ /blog/
http://twitter.com/ernestopriego/status/293771668579553280
— Ernesto Priego (@ernestopriego)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:26:38 - @ResearchTrendy Thanks for organizing this and thanks to all participants.! #scholnet
http://twitter.com/jbrittholbrook/status/293771667879100416
— J Britt Holbrook (@jbrittholbrook)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:26:38 - Just got busted for checking tweets on #scholnet instead of listening to moderator's questions. Whoops! Blushing on camera!
http://twitter.com/researchremix/status/293771498810929152
— Heather Piwowar (@researchremix)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:25:57 - Debate om #scholnet : scholarly vs public impact, quality vs impact, downloads, bookmarking vs citations ...
http://twitter.com/Ecobibl/status/293771377855574017
— Marianne (@Ecobibl)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:25:29 - now we're getting to the core of it: we have to find out what altmetrics mean: whz are people bookmarking? #scholnet
http://twitter.com/sh2106/status/293771330250211328
— Stefanie Haustein (@sh2106)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:25:17 - @kelli_barr Should we separate scholarly and non-scholarly impact? Perhaps not strictly: http://cas-csid.cas.unt.edu/?p=2606%29 unscholnet=2606%29 #scholnet
http://twitter.com/jbrittholbrook/status/293769955164438528
— J Britt Holbrook (@jbrittholbrook)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:19:49 - Sorry folks, I am quitting as well #scholnet intermittent discussion is becoming unbearable
http://twitter.com/Wowter/status/293769886159732736
— WoW!ter (@Wowter)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:19:33 - #scholnet @researchremix usefully reminds us that "quality" & "impact" are not the same thing, gauged by the same measures
http://twitter.com/DanaMcFarland/status/293769337821614080
— Dana (@DanaMcFarland)Tue, Jan 22 2013 17:17:22