-
Recent Posts
- Team unearths what may be secret weapon against antibiotic resistance
- Hazing: How to hide in nearly plain sight | Student Science
- 3quarksdaily: Philosophy is a Bunch of Empty Ideas: Interview with Peter Unger
- Thirst for water moves and shakes California | Student Science
- Digital displays get flexible | Student Science
Recent Comments
- Jeff Ollerton on 56 Indicators of Impact
- Jodie on 56 Indicators of Impact
- Brigitte on From Peer Review to the Wisdom of Crowds? Open Access & Peer Review | History Workshop
- Adam on Scenes from another academic conference
- Altmetrics: achieving and measuring success in communicating research in the digital age | Hazel Hall on 56 Indicators of Impact
Archives
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
Categories
- Accountability
- Basic News
- Broader Impacts
- Calls for papers
- Climate Change
- Conferences Upcoming
- Convergence
- Creative & Visual Science
- CSID Publications
- Degrowth Economics
- Economics & STEM Research
- Environmental policy
- Field Philosophy
- Future of the University
- Gas Fracking
- Globalization
- Graduate Studies
- Innovation
- institutionalizing interdisciplinarity
- Interdisciplinarity
- Libraries
- Metrics
- Multidisciplinarity
- NASA
- New Books
- New Lexicon
- NIH
- NOAA
- NSF
- Occupy Wall Street
- Open Access
- Peer Review
- Philosophy & Politics
- Public Pedagogy
- Public Philosophizing
- Science and technology ramifications
- STEM Policy
- Sustainability, Risk Management, & Long-Term Security
- TechnoScience & Technoscientism
- Transdisciplinarity
- Transformative Research
- Uncategorized
- US Science Agencies
Meta
Category Archives: Open Access
A new paradigm of scholarly communications is emerging: A report from the Future of Impact conference | Impact of Social Sciences
Policymakers and academics agree that the economic or public impact of research can’t be demonstrated through just citations and bibliometrics yet open access publishing, altmetrics and online methods must be further developed before we can rely on them to prove … Continue reading
Science is “being harmed,” but all I can muster is a bit of schadenfreude…
A somewhat alarmist outcry went up Monday on HuffPost regarding the state of scientific publishing, and it’s dripping with cynicism. Here’s a snippet that I think is representative of the author’s perspective; he seeks to draw an analogy between the … Continue reading
On Live Tweeting Your Own Lecture – The Long Road
Autotweeting a lecture and getting folks actively involved through social media… Anyone who actually uses twitter recognizes that its power comes not from what one pushes out, but from what one receives. This is felt most palpably when one invites … Continue reading
More Than Just Access: Delivering on a Network-Enabled Literature
Cameron Neylon (@CameronNeylon on Twitter) delivers a clear argument for allowing commercial reuse of your research: PLOS Biology: More Than Just Access: Delivering on a Network-Enabled Literature.
Posted in Open Access
Leave a comment
Tweeting out loud: ethics, knowledge and social media in academe | Impact of Social Sciences
Melonie Fullick offers a nice run-down of the recent discussion of the issue of live tweeting at academic conferences: Tweeting out loud: ethics, knowledge and social media in academe | Impact of Social Sciences. One of the more interesting points … Continue reading
Posted in Accountability, Future of the University, Metrics, Open Access, Peer Review
Tagged tweeting, Twitter
Leave a comment
Twitter, peer review and altmetrics: the future of research impact assessment | Higher Education Network | Guardian Professional
Scroll down to the comments below the article for discussion. Twitter, peer review and altmetrics: the future of research impact assessment | Higher Education Network | Guardian Professional.
Want to Change Academic Publishing? Just Say No – Commentary – The Chronicle of Higher Education
When I became a professor, 20 years ago, I received a request from a woman who lived close to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where I taught: Could she come and talk to me about a set of interests she … Continue reading
Can E-Tutoring Bridge Economic Divides?
In a 1984 paper that is regarded as a classic of educational psychology, Benjamin Bloom, a professor at the University of Chicago, showed that being tutored is the most effective way to learn, vastly superior to being taught in a classroom. … Continue reading
Toward A More Inclusive Backchannel: An Unusual Call To Action » Cyborgology
As the 2012 meeting of the American Sociological Association (#ASA2012) kicks into gear, I want to use this post to start a conversation about a somewhat-contentious topic: academics’ use of Twitter, particularly at conferences. via Toward A More Inclusive Backchannel: … Continue reading
The science of the future is… art?
Philosopher Santiago Zabala has a piece out today in Al Jazeera about the saving power of art. Globalization, he claims, has wrought an era where the aesthetic calling is not l’art pour l’art – art for art’s sake, or what … Continue reading
Whither Science Publishing? | The Scientist
Well worth reading. Whither Science Publishing? | The Scientist.
Posted in Accountability, Open Access, Peer Review
Leave a comment
Is there a conflict between altmetrics and peer review?
Some Thoughts on Peer Review and Altmetrics | Partially Attended An interesting take on my abstract for the upcoming altmetrics12 workshop from Ian Mulvaney – Head of Technology for a neat new publishing endeavor in the UK called eLifeSciences. …after … Continue reading
Posted in Future of the University, Metrics, Open Access, Peer Review
Leave a comment
Scholars are quickly moving toward a universe of web-native communication | Impact of Social Sciences
Jason Priem’s new post on the LSEImpact blog is quite interesting. For example: We found Web presence widespread and diverse: 84 per cent of scholars had homepages, 70 per cent were on LinkedIn, 23 per cent had public Google Scholar profiles, and 16 … Continue reading
Posted in Accountability, Future of the University, Metrics, Open Access
Tagged altmetrics, Leiden
Leave a comment
Scholarly Communications: New Developments in Open Access
Neil Stewart of City University provides more insight into recent developments regarding Open Access: RSP event: Scholarly Communications: New Developments in Open Access « City Open Access.
Your Peers, Your Science. Academic Publishing is Evolving. – PeerJ Blog
A new journal has just opened its doors for business, and it’s making quite a splash. The reason is its proposed new publishing model. Authors will pay a one-time fee ($259) for lifetime privileges to submit to the journal, have … Continue reading
Posted in Future of the University, Libraries, Open Access, Peer Review
Tagged Open access journal
Leave a comment
Science in the Open » Blog Archive » 25,000 signatures and still rolling: Implications of the White House petition
The formula for my happiness: a Yes, a No, a straight line, a goal. –Nietzsche Cameron Neylon awakens to a nice surprise, takes stock, and wonders: what’s next for Open Access? The really hard work of implementation is … Continue reading
What data can and cannot do | News | guardian.co.uk
Jonathan Gray argues that aspiring data journalists and civic data hackers should strive to cut back on data-driven hype and to cultivate a more critical literacy towards their subject matter. What data can and cannot do | News | guardian.co.uk. … Continue reading
Posted in Libraries, Metrics, Open Access, Science and technology ramifications, STEM Policy
Tagged data, hype, limits, technoscience
Leave a comment
Open Access Petition — Opening Access to Research or Courting Disaster? UPDATED
Here is the text of the petition: WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO: Require free access over the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research. We believe in the power of the Internet to foster innovation, research, and … Continue reading
Rule Britannia! On David Willetts and open access to research.
Commentary on the recent speech by Willetts suggesting UK will begin to mandate open access publication for funded research. Rule Britannia! On David Willetts and open access to research..
Open access as a matter of academic ethics — and more.
Yes, Open Access is an ethical question, in part. Open access as a matter of academic ethics: The right thing to do « Omega Alpha | Open Access. But there are other issues, some ethical and some political and institutional. … Continue reading
Stanford’s President: Distance Learning is a “Tsunami”
Hennessy, [Stanford's President], believes that online learning can be as revolutionary to education as digital downloads were to the music business. Distance learningA threatens one day to disrupt higher education by reducing the cost of college and by offering the … Continue reading
Posted in Future of the University, Open Access
Leave a comment
The Virtues of Blogging as Scholarly Activity – The Digital Campus – The Chronicle of Higher Education
We tend to overstate the dangers of open approaches and overlook the benefits, while the converse holds true for the closed system. via The Virtues of Blogging as Scholarly Activity – The Digital Campus – The Chronicle of Higher Education. … Continue reading
The Future of Peer Review | TechCrunch
Richard Price, founder of Academia.edu, on two possible futures for peer review of immediately released papers (that is, papers that do not receive prepublication peer review). The Future of Peer Review | TechCrunch.
New Open Access Working Group Formed: Formulating Response to Elsevier’s Policy Change
Interesting in that it distinguishes Elsevier from other publishers in terms of their response to Open Access policies: New Open Access Working Group Formed: Formulating Response to Elsevier’s Policy Change.
Posted in Accountability, Open Access
Leave a comment
The question of who ought to count as a peer is THE question surrounding open access | The Sociological Imagination
I respond to Steve Fuller’s claim that Open Access is no more than academic consumerism here: The question of who ought to count as a peer is THE question surrounding open access | The Sociological Imagination. There is a sense … Continue reading