Description: | Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it. |
---|---|
Creator(s): | |
Creation Date: | March 1, 2012 |
Partner(s): |
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
|
Collection(s): |
UNT Scholarly Works
|
Usage: |
Total Uses: 272
Past 30 days: 2
Yesterday: 0
|
Creator (Author): |
Holbrook, J. Britt
University of North Texas |
|
---|---|---|
Creator (Author): |
Frodeman, Robert
University of North Texas |
|
Publisher Info: |
Publisher Name: Center for American Progress
Place of Publication: [Washington, D.C.]
|
|
Date(s): |
|
|
Description: | Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it. |
|
Degree: |
Department:
Philosophy and Religion Studies
|
|
Physical Description: |
4 p. |
|
Language(s): | ||
Subject(s): |
|
|
Keyword(s): | scientific research | Broader Impacts Merit Review | peer review | intellectual merit | |
Source: | Science Progress, 2012, Washington DC: Center for American Progress | |
Partner: |
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
|
|
Collection: |
UNT Scholarly Works
|
|
Identifier: |
|
|
Resource Type: | Article | |
Format: | Text | |
Rights: |
Access:
Public
|