| Description: | Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it. |
|---|---|
| Creator(s): | |
| Creation Date: | March 1, 2012 |
| Partner(s): |
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
|
| Collection(s): |
UNT Scholarly Works
|
| Usage: |
Total Uses: 272
Past 30 days: 2
Yesterday: 0
|
| Creator (Author): |
Holbrook, J. Britt
University of North Texas |
|
|---|---|---|
| Creator (Author): |
Frodeman, Robert
University of North Texas |
|
| Publisher Info: |
Publisher Name: Center for American Progress
Place of Publication: [Washington, D.C.]
|
|
| Date(s): |
|
|
| Description: | Article describing changes in the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) merit review criteria. The authors argue that scientists are more likely to preserve their autonomy by embracing - or 'owning' - the new Broader Impacts Criterion rather than resisting it. |
|
| Degree: |
Department:
Philosophy and Religion Studies
|
|
| Physical Description: |
4 p. |
|
| Language(s): | ||
| Subject(s): |
|
|
| Keyword(s): | scientific research | Broader Impacts Merit Review | peer review | intellectual merit | |
| Source: | Science Progress, 2012, Washington DC: Center for American Progress | |
| Partner: |
UNT College of Arts and Sciences
|
|
| Collection: |
UNT Scholarly Works
|
|
| Identifier: |
|
|
| Resource Type: | Article | |
| Format: | Text | |
| Rights: |
Access:
Public
|
|
