Business academics suggest world follow China's lead to boost markets for renewable resource technology

18 hours ago by Bob Yirka report
Source: Renewables 2014 Global Status Report, via Nature

John Mathews a professor of strategic management at Macquarie University and Hao Tan a senior lecturer with Newcastle Business School, both in Australia, have published a Comment piece in the journal Nature, suggesting that the rest of the world follow China's lead in boosting markets for renewable energy resource technology.

The two acknowledge that China is the world's largest emitter of , mainly due to emissions from coal fired . But they note that China is also the world's largest producer of electricity from —producing 378 gigawatts compared to the U.S. which is in second place and produces 172 gigawatts. Put another way, they note that China produces more power from wind, hydro and solar than Germany and France combined. It's also no accident, the pair add, China has been aggressively pursuing both production scale and market growth in renewable resource technology. They look at renewable energy as a means of providing the country with a secure future.

China's model for promoting renewable resource technology is in stark contrast to current policies in much of the rest of the world, the two note. In the U.S. and Britain, for example, the emphasis is on promoting non-renewable resources, such as coal, gas and petroleum—fracking has been hailed as a way to ensure energy independence over the next century. But, they point out, that ignores one basic problem of that approach—it's still relying on a resource that is eventually going to run out. Instead of promoting investment in renewable resource technology that might help meet the needs of the entire planet going forth into the future, governments and private enterprises in most developed countries are focusing on securing energy now and in the money that can be made in doing so.

Mathews and Tan note that the model built by the Chinese is clearly working—prices for solar panels in that country have been falling steadily highlighting just one example. Sadly, instead of taking advantage of the gains made by the Chinese, other countries have moved to levying tariffs on imports of those very same panels to prevent domestic competition. But in so doing, they are also reducing innovation, which is of course, supposed to be one of the foundations of the capitalist system. The pair suggests the rest of the world take notice of the progress China has made in moving to sources, and follow its lead.

Explore further: Cutting fossil subsidies must to advance renewables: agency

More information: Economics: Manufacture renewables to build energy security, Nature, www.nature.com/news/economics-… rgy-security-1.15847

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Rising gas prices make renewables a sure bet

Aug 12, 2014

New analysis by UNSW suggests that renewable investment is likely to be cheaper and lower risk for Australia, since rising and uncertain gas prices make baseload gas-fired electricity high risk and high cost.

China says US energy projects violate free trade

Aug 21, 2012

(AP) — China's government has ruled that U.S. government support to six American solar and wind power projects violates free trade rules, adding to strains between Beijing and its trading partners over renewable energy.

Recommended for you

Regulators reject call for nuke plant shutdown

20 hours ago

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Wednesday rejected a senior federal expert's recommendation to shut down California's last operating nuclear power plant until the agency can determine whether its twin reactors can withstand ...

Few critics as Nevada mulls Tesla tax breaks

20 hours ago

The Nevada Legislature has adjourned the first day of a special session considering an unprecedented package of up to $1.3 billion in incentives to bring Tesla Motors' $5 billion battery factory to the state.

User comments : 16

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JamesG
not rated yet 17 hours ago
"prices for solar panels in that country have been falling steadily

In a country where the government controls everything, even prices, why would you trust any data you get?
JRi
not rated yet 17 hours ago
I think Chinese government has supported domestic solar panel industry so heavily that it has basically forced most US and European panel manufacturers to shut down their production.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) 17 hours ago
"Those enamored of China's ability to build empty apartments, empty malls and empty train stations are missing the big story, which is China's boom is unraveling one person and one trade at a time. "
"The conventional Western observer's enthusiasm for China's glitzy facade is matched by his abysmal ignorance of China and on-the-ground realities. "
http://www.oftwom...-14.html

China is making progress?
gkam
5 / 5 (2) 8 hours ago
Why are conservatives afraid of the truth?

China leads us in alternative energy. Our hateful conservatives want us to stay mired in petroleum pollution. It is how they make their money.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) 8 hours ago
China leads us in alternative energy.

So?
"The headline story is China's amazing rush into building X,Y,Z: today high-speed rail, tomorrow, thousands of wind turbines. What few care to examine is the maintenance requirements of every one of those thousands of wind turbines. Without obsessive attention to the quality of each component and regular maintenance of each turbine, those initially impressive thousands will dwindle to hundreds and then dozens of operable turbines as the years grind away at inferior components and a lack of maintenance takes its toll. "
http://www.oftwom...-14.html
Aligo
1 / 5 (2) 8 hours ago
Business academics suggest world follow China's lead to boost markets for renewable resource technology
The Chinese would be just happy about it. They already provide most of indium, neodymium and solar cells for the rest of world. But it would make the rest of world dependent on Chinese raw sources in similar way, like it already depends on Arabian oil with all consequences of it. The only salvation for USA would be the advancement in cold fusion research. Unfortunately it seems, that the contemporary USA are so decadent and braked with their fossil fuel oligarchy, that even the cold fusion will be implemented with China first.
gkam
5 / 5 (1) 8 hours ago
Aligo, you referred me to a list of studies into cold fusion days ago, yet you say nobody is pursuing it.

They are working on it, but it seems to have been an ethereal process.
Aligo
1 / 5 (2) 7 hours ago
yet you say nobody is pursuing it
Cold fusion is ignored with mainstream science. It doesn't mean, it's not researched with enthusiasts and private companies.
gkam
3 / 5 (2) 7 hours ago
Lots of folk have put a lot of time and money into it. I thought it was a great idea, and even probable, but we have yet to see it.
Aligo
1 / 5 (2) 6 hours ago
but we have yet to see it
IMO the progress with cold fusion corresponds exactly the volume of money thrown into it. This volume is so low, that the cold fusion studies even didn't penetrate the mainstream journals. Whereas many trivial findings found its way into Nature/Science/PLOS journals without problem. If we consider that the total cost of cold fusion research was bellow 100 millions USD, then this volume is lower than the cost of single WIMPs detector (BTW during last twenty years we didn't find the WIMPs conclusively too, despite the WIMPs are useless from practical perspective and we maintain dozens of such detectors already). From some (but quite transparent reason for me) the proponents of mainstream science are very impatient regarding the cold fusion research. They just want to see conclusive results first, commercial results at best. But the basic research doesn't work in this way: you cannot have the practically interesting results first, research later.
Aligo
1 / 5 (2) 6 hours ago
The apparent bias of mainstream regarding the cold fusion is particularly visible at the replication attitude. Today, after nearly one hundred of years we still have no peer-reviewed replications of first cold fusion observation of Panneth & Petters (1926). Whereas for example the peeling of graphene (which is essentially useless from practical perspective) was immediately replicated with hundreds of labs in mainstream high impacted journals.

Now we just have a paradox: why we have no replication of potentially very important finding during one hundred of years, while we have thousands of replications of useless finding in few months? Well, the answer is simple: the former finding steals the jobs for many researchers at the same moment, whereas the later findings brings a lotta new jobs for researchers instead (the peeling of graphene is excellent tool for lab research). It's very simple logics in fact.
Aligo
1 / 5 (1) 6 hours ago
Unfortunately I'm afraid, that the things had come too far, because we are already on the verge of full scale military conflict with Russia at Ukraine. This conflict was initiated with fight for newly revealed oil fields around Crimea, which Russia annexed. It indicates, in contemporary world the oil already became too precious and strategically important commodity. The twenty years standing ignorance of mainstream physics didn't pay off the people, who are paying it. We should therefore throw all money into alternative energy research (not just cold fusion) for to avoid the global nuclear war scenario. I'm also convinced, that just this research, i.e. not the wasteful market of renewables is, what could save the geopolitical position of the USA. If you're living in USA, Japan or Europe, then just this research is your primary strategical target right now. I'm not kidding you.
gkam
5 / 5 (1) 5 hours ago
Aligo, As I said once before, There was much interest and action immediately after the announcement. I was coincidentally in San Diego to give a lecture for San Diego Gas & Electric the next day, and was invited to witness the test run that night by a friend in General Atomic, which ran their duplication of it in the old GE Triga reactor.

No Neutrons.
Aligo
1 / 5 (1) 5 hours ago
There was much interest and action immediately after the announcement
Oh come on. None of attempts for replication got into mainstream journals. Work, finish, publish. No publishing in science just means, nothing did actually happen. And now we are still talking about fusion at palladium, which is expensive as hell. The practically really important hydrogen fusion at nickel wasn't attempted to replicate at all. Actually absolutely no interest and action followed this finding. So if you're really interested about it, then you have a twenty years long delay already. This is whole one human generation and the world gets shitty pretty fast by now, if you didn't realize it....
gkam
3 / 5 (2) 5 hours ago
You are correct, and there is good news for you. The power production systems we integrated into our grid at PG&E in the 1980's are even more efficient, efficacious, and productive.

Most folk do not understand how things work, or anything regarding energy. When a Senior Engineer in Technical Services, I got the inventors. That is why I am occasionally but unintentionally rude reacting to extreme claims.

My MS thesis in 1982 included the design of a real energy system operating on pollution and producing 180-proof ethanol, cattle feed, electricity, for sale, and nutrients for both cattle and the fields to grow the next crop, with stabilized nutrients and beneficial bacteria still on the cellulosic substrate.

The 7,000 head dairy now stinking up my hometown could provide all its own power, hot water, bedding, some nutrients for itself, and electricity for a thousand homes.
Aligo
1 / 5 (1) 4 hours ago
are even more efficient, efficacious, and productive
With these power production systems the USA will become a regional power fast. You'll get the black people revolution and the Detroit will become a role model for the whole country. Just because the American researchers are blind idiots who do care about their own thesis only.