• FGloria Origgi, Research Fellow, CNRS, Institut Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole des Hautes Etudes, Paris.

Title of the work: Research Impact: We Need Negative Metrics Too

• 8.5/10  read review - Anonymous

• FJ. Britt Holbrook, Other, Center for the Study of Interdisciplinarity, University of North Texas.

• 466Comparative Assessment of Peer Review Survey
• 385The Philosopher a la Jean-Francois Lyotard
• 385The Promise and Perils of Transformative Research
• 364The Use of Societal Impacts Considerations in Grant Proposal Peer Review: A Comparison of Five Models
• 346Re-assessing the science – society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s broader impacts merit review criterion (1997 – 2011)
• 256EU--US Workshop On Peer Review: Assessing "Broader Impact" In Research Grant Applications
• 255Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts
• 138Fuller's Categorical Imperative: The Will to Proaction
• 119What is Interdisciplinarity Communication? Reflections on the Very Idea of Disciplinary Integration
• 109Knowing and acting: The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making
• 83Blue Skies, Impacts, and Peer Review
• 4NSF's struggle to articulate relevance.
• 2Accountable Science
• 2Evaluating Research beyond Scientific Impact How to Include Criteria for Productive Interactions and Impact on Practice and Society
• 1Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion
• 1Does open access really threaten peer review?
• 1Philosophy Matters -- Examining the Value of Knowledge

• 56EU--US Workshop On Peer Review: Assessing "Broader Impact" In Research Grant Applications
• 55Re-assessing the science – society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s broader impacts merit review criterion (1997 – 2011)
• 16Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts
• 9The Philosopher a la Jean-Francois Lyotard
• 9Comparative Assessment of Peer Review Survey
• 9The Promise and Perils of Transformative Research
• 8The Use of Societal Impacts Considerations in Grant Proposal Peer Review: A Comparison of Five Models
• 7NSF's struggle to articulate relevance.
• 6Accountable Science
• 6Science: For Science’s or Society’s Sake? Owning the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion
• 6What is Interdisciplinarity Communication? Reflections on the Very Idea of Disciplinary Integration
• 5Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion
• 5Resistance to impact criteria can lead to a tightening of the accountability noose.
• 5Good Transformations
• 4Putting Darwin in his place: the need to watch our language
• 4First INIT Virtual Seminar on Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Horizons
• 3Does open access really threaten peer review?
• 3Evaluating Research beyond Scientific Impact How to Include Criteria for Productive Interactions and Impact on Practice and Society
• 2Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion
• 2NSF's struggle to articulate relevance.
• 2Fuller's Categorical Imperative: The Will to Proaction
• 1Philosophy Matters -- Examining the Value of Knowledge
• 1Open Access Petition — Opening Access to Research or Courting Disaster?
• 1Knowing and acting: The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making
• 1Research Impact: We Need Negative Metrics Too
• 1Blue Skies, Impacts, and Peer Review

Title of the work: Re-assessing the science – society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s broader impacts merit review criterion (1997 – 2011)

• Anonymous (2)

• FGuillaume Dupuy d'Angeac, Publisher, Collective Developments.
• FBrian Glanz, Multi-disciplinary, Open Science Federation, Northwest Association for Biomedical Research.

• FChristophe Al-Saleh, Lecturer, Université de Picardie, Amiens, France.
• FAalam Wassef, Publisher, Founder of Peer Evaluation, Galerie Conradi.
• FGloria Origgi, Research Fellow, CNRS, Institut Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole des Hautes Etudes, Paris.
• FMario Neve, Associate Professor, Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna Campus, Ravenna.
• FThomas Johnson, Lecturer, University of Melbourne.
• FKelli Barr, Junior professional, Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, Center for the Study of Interdisicplinarity, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, FL.

• FGloria Origgi, Research Fellow, CNRS, Institut Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole des Hautes Etudes, Paris.
• FStevan Harnad, Professor, University of Southampton.
• FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation, Collective Developments.
• FAalam Wassef, Publisher, Founder of Peer Evaluation, Galerie Conradi.
• FClement Levallois, Post Doctorate, Rotterdam School of Management, E-humanities group of the KNAW, Erasmus Studio, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Gephi Consortium.
• FChristophe Al-Saleh, Lecturer, Université de Picardie, Amiens, France.
• FNathias von Helling, Student, Ph.D. Level, speculative metaphysics.
• FFederico Viola, Student, Ph.D. Level, Philosophy Faculty, Freiburg.
• FBarry Smith, Professor, Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
• FRichard Price, Independent researcher, Oxford University.
• FMarc Augier, Professor, SKEMA, Sophia Antipolis, SKEMA Business School, Suzhou, China.
• FGordana Dodig Crnkovic, Associate Professor, Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Computer Science Lab, Västerås, Sweden.
• FClaudia Koltzenburg, Multi-disciplinary, Clinic for Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendrof, Hamburg.
• FGiulio Lizzi, Student, Ph.D. Level, University of Perugia / University of Lugano, University of Perugia (PhD candidate), University of Lugano (visiting researcher).
• FMarkus Peschl, Professor, University of Vienna.
• FNiki Pfeifer, Post Doctorate, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Faculty 10, Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Munich, Germany, Tilburg University, The Tilburg Center for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
• FMario Neve, Associate Professor, Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna Campus, Ravenna.
• FRobert Frodeman, Professor, Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton.
• FHeather Piwowar, Post Doctorate, DataONE at NESCent, Dryad data repository, University of British Columbia.
• FLuciano Floridi, Professor, Hertfordshire and Oxford.

• US NSF Workshop: Assessing the Broader Societal Impact of Funding Techno-Scientific Research, Grant Number 0649573 / Year 2007
• US NSF SciSIP (MOD): A Comparative Assessment of Models for Integrating Societal Impacts Concerns into the Peer Review of Grant Proposals , Grant Number 0830387 / Year 2008
• US NSF Transformative Research: Social and Ethical Implications, Grant Number 1129067 / Year 2011

• Peer Evaluation, Publisher.

Title of the work: Citizen Science and the Academic Spring

• 0.5/10  read reviewAalam Wassef, Publisher.

Title of the work: Press Kit / Peer Evaluation

• 0.5/10  read reviewPeer Evaluation, Publisher.

Title of the work:

• 0.5/10  read reviewAalam Wassef, Publisher.
• 0.5/10  read reviewPeer Evaluation, Publisher.

• The Philosopher a la Jean-Francois Lyotard     J. Britt Holbrook, Other.

Title of the work: Citizen Science and the Academic Spring

• Pending linkAalam Wassef, Publisher.

• Heather Piwowar, Post Doctorate, DataONE at NESCent.
• Peer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.