Rebels Without an Ideological Cause

It is clear (although perhaps not to Fox News viewers) that we are living in a moment of historic political resistance. The “Arab Spring” is convulsing the political regimes of the Middle East and the “Occupy” movement is emerging as the most widespread political protest in the United States since the 1960′s. While there are necessarily many differences between the movements due to their cultural situatedness, there is an essential similarity: they are all anti-ideological. Not only do they oppose neoliberalism (the dominant ideology of our times) as it is variously reflected in our societies, they remain steadfastly against coalescing behind any alternative ideology.

What these movements express is often mistakenly called ‘populism.’ This appellation is correct in the sense that the demonstrators in New York and Cairo are rebelling against their exploitation by a socioeconomic elite, but an -ism connotes an ideology or at least a unified plan of action: social-ism, commun-ism, etc.

Rather, the protesters are acting in the spirit of what philosopher Jean-Luc Nancy has called “being singular-plural,” a collective assertion of a group identity that is constantly heedful of the dignity of the individual. It’s through their refusal to assent to ideologically established terms of discourse that the collective actions of these demonstrators speak so loudly. It may make them look chaotic or ineffectual in the short run, but profound social change comes gradually, not all at once.

This entry was posted in Degrowth Economics, Occupy Wall Street, Open Access, Sustainability, Risk Management, & Long-Term Security. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Rebels Without an Ideological Cause

  1. Fábio Valenti Possamai says:

    I think I disagree with the assertion (as stated by some people) that says the protesters don’t know what they want. This movement, this “anxiety” clearly is saying something. It tells us that, all around the world, people are tired (finally). We have come to a turning point, maybe beyond the “event horizon” – and we can’t go back now. We really need some “fresh thinking” and some “fresh living” in this planet. Let’s hope this movement be capable of achieve its goals. What goals? Well, precisely these ones…

  2. Keith Brown says:

    I very much appreciate the invocation here of Jean Luc Nancy. The attempt to communicate (which comes from recognizing our being-singular-plural) is being denigrated in favor of communion (that the status quo would prefer to make everyone be as one with the same dreams & the same goals). The shipwreck of communication–that we cannot get across everything we feel/think–rightly discomforts those who would give up anything to simply not have disagreement. Let’s just all play along.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>