That ‘Vision Thing’

Not the least of Maine’s glories is her coastline, thousands of miles of it, with countless harbors offering respite or refuge for her many sailors.  And experienced sailors know that, while they can find a harbor on a nautical chart, the likelihood of their arriving there depends upon a well-weighted keel and their crews’ ability to tack to ever changing winds.

Thus this Mainer was struck by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Janus-faced complaint that the president who enabled her to become Secretary of State lacked a foreign policy with “vision,” or an “organizing principle.”  Former President George H. W. Bush could sympathize with President Obama; he, too, was blamed for lacking “the vision thing.”[1]

One of the most powerful “organizing principles” of the last two centuries has been that of the unified nation state as the driving force of history.  As a monument of German political theory in the 19th century, the idea’s most enduring consequences lay amid the carnage of two world wars.

But the ideal of the unified nation state has had a powerful influence here, too.  The preservation of the union was Abraham Lincoln’s vision when he decided to resupply Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor (April 15, 1861).[2] By contrast, the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, was a smart tactical measure–but of no less historic consequence.

The Civil War also produced this country’s only original formal philosophy—pragmatism: Sanity, in public as in private life, belongs not to the hedgehog, with its one big idea, but to the foxes, who know many things.[3] Nothing, then, could be more American than President Obama’s notion that, above all else, we should not do something stupid.

Weary of the 1970s, this country may have been comforted to hear Ronald Reagan’s invocation of the United States as “a city on a hill.”  But John Winthrop’s Puritan vision for the tiny, homogeneous Massachusetts Bay Colony no longer befits a large, heterogeneous, diverse, and generally bumptious land like ours.  To much of the rest of the world, a city on a hill bears a strong resemblance to an empire upon which the sun never sets.

“Strategic vision,” an ill-fitting combination of military theory and romantic idealism, has surely become one of the most widely hawked nostrums of modern management in both private and public sectors.  Were public administration (a.k.a. “government bureaucracy”) less a subject of general opprobrium, more of us would know of Charles E. Lindblom’s now classic essay, “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’” (1959).[4]

In it Lindblom argues convincingly that the inherently messy business of democratic politics is not such a bad thing, because “muddling through” would “assure a more comprehensive regard for the values of the whole society than any attempt at intellectual comprehensiveness.”

Which brings us to the University of Southern Maine’s costly—in consultant fees, faculty time, student distraction, and administrative overhead—groping for the single “organizing framework” or “vision” to lead itself out of its budgetary doldrums.  A university should require no management consultants and community meetings to help it identify its guiding vision for the future.  The idea of a university is the vision:  a place of cosmopolitan learning and liberation from dogmas past and present.  Attaching its fortunes to any local community is to risk its future on local values. The idea of a university is the boat’s well-weighted keel.  A nimble faculty crew, and a captain who can read the water as well as the sails, will maintain the boat on its proper voyage.

But not all of us in Maine are sailors.  For those who aren’t, there is wisdom from John Irving’s “The Cider House Rules,” set in Maine.  It comes from Arthur, head of the seasonal apple-picking crew: “know what your business is.”

 


[1] Time magazine (January 26, 1987).

[2] Sylvia Fries (Kraemer), “Abraham Lincoln and the Language of Sectional Crisis,” Lincoln Herald (1977).

[3] “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing” -Archilochus

[4] Public Administration Review, Vol. 19 (1959), 79-88.


“Net Neutrality” and The New Enclosure (Part I)

Those of us who oppose allowing Internet service providers to impose tolls on users wanting to use higher broadband transmission speeds are rowing upstream.  This is not only because powerful interests—among them, AT&T, Verizon, and cable companies—want to exploit U.S. policy’s current treatment of Internet access as a commercial commodity, rather than a public utility.


The New Enclosure (Part II)

The notion that the things we create belong to us is not new; it dates back at least to 560, when Ireland’s King Diarrmait ruled against the monk Colmcille, who had secretly copied his mentor Finnian’s psalter.  (Legend records Diarmait’s judgment as “To every cow belongs her calf, therefore to every book belongs its copy.”)


The New Enclosure (Part III)

  Discussions of patent policy in the United States and elsewhere often overlook the fact that the original intent of issuing patents (not to be confused with sovereign-granted commercial privileges) was to encourage the disclosure and spread of novel devices to stimulate manufacturing and trade.  The earliest patents (such as those awarded by the Republic


Why The Liberal Arts?

  It’s difficult to hear a discussion of education in the United States without being reminded of the urgency of increasing students’ proficiency in ‘STEM’ (science, technology, engineering and math) disciplines.  This, we learn, is necessary to secure their competitiveness in a technology-driven job market.  What is too rarely pointed out is that a primary


National Public Wi-Fi: Why it Matters to You

  A recent proposal by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman, Julius Genachowski, would recover some of the country’s little used radio and TV broadcast radio spectrum in order to create a national public wireless (WiFi) network.  Telecommunications companies, which make money selling data plans to enable smart phone and Wi-Fi computer users to access the


Lessons From Our Table

One of the blessings of the past holiday for this Maine parent was the return of adult children home for Christmas.  Humorists console some of us with tales of dysfunctional families to help dispel the mixed emotions conjured up by the holidays.  A largely functional family is also a blessing. Ours has slogged its way


Senator Rubio’s Mistake

An astronomer writing in Slate recently takes Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to task for being unable (or unwilling?) to give the astronomers’ answer to a reporter’s question, posed during a press interview, about the age of the Earth.  After noting that the question has nothing to do with the proper subject of the interview, Rubio


Ten Tips for the 53%

In a recent letter to the editor of the local newspaper a reader supports Mr. Romney’s assertion that 47% of the American public depends on federal benefits, and therefore undeserving of the presidential candidate’s concern.  The letter writer then shares with us his pride at being part of the other 53%, Without mentioning national defense


Maine: The Costs of “Political Speech”

In its article on forced ‘disappearance’ to eliminate political opposition, Wikipedia lists no less than 22 countries where ruling parties have resorted to this practice.  Among the better known are Argentina and Chile, under the regimes of Jorge Rafael Videla (1976-1981) and Augusto Pinochet (1976-1981), respectively. As a means of eliminating unwelcome political speech, ‘disappearing’