Palin and Beck are not the point, the point is the destruction of the Gulf of Mexico. But revisiting their remarks can be instructive.
Flames engulf the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, 04/26/10. (photo: AP)
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
It's strange all of BP's environmentally friendly TV ads seemed to have disappeared. :-)
Palin did say Obama was JUST STALLING, THEY did not believe him....if $arah agrees with you, you KNOW you are off in the wrong direction!
Anyway he had better do an about face, even ARNOLD did today, saying what happened on the Gulf WILL NEVER HAPPEN IN CALIFORNIA, no drilling. I have to commend him for that.
Even pigs if offered will not crap in or on the place where they lay their heads.
God Bless the world ....NO God Help the World and free us from Corporate dominance.
The disaster could be catastrophic and BP and all connected to them should not only have to pay for clean-up but jobs lost.
Natural disasters will bankrupt the U.S. further. Corporations should be fined right out of business.
All vehicles follow the laws of physics in that one form of energy is converted to another. Petro-vehicles take chemical energy (gasoline is nothing more than "stored sunlight") and convert it to mechanical energy (i.e., movement). Non-petro-vehic les take electrical or chemical energy (also, essentially "stored sunlight") and convert it to mechanical energy. If electricity were plentiful it could be used to produce all kinds of clean (i.e., non-petro) fuels either directly (e.g., hydrogen) or indirectly (e.g., algal biodiesel).
If you haven't yet, read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'. Friedman makes abundantly clear why putting gas in your tank is tantamount to putting a gun in the hands of the petrodictators. Renewable energy is not a 'green' cause, it's national security!!
According to David Kotok of Cumberland Advisers, initial estimates of cleanup costs totaling about $12.5 billion are "only a starter."
http://www.businessinsider.com/david-kotok-125-billion-is-just-the-start-of-the-oil-cleanup-costs-and-a-double-dip-is-now-way-more-likely-2010-5
"As nerve-racking and potentially destructive as this spill is, it is not sufficient cause to abandon a broader energy strategy that includes the search for conventional fuels. Some perspective is useful. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/29/opinion/29thurs3.html
CARS SHOULD RUN ENTIRELY ON HEMP JUST LIKE THEY DO IN SOME SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES NOW, WHICH ARE OBVIOUSLY MORE PROGRESSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE THAN WE ARE ON ENERGY.
RSS feed for comments to this post