Dancing Young Men From High Windows

You Are Invited to a Lifestyle of Friendship

Parker Novels

By the end of the spring semester I’m usually about ready for long distance reading. Usually this means noir, though last year I read China Mieville into Proust. (Proust, oddly enough, relaxes me to no end, and last May I spent three weeks reading him for 4 or so hours a day in the late morning, and then going for a run, and then reading him for another 2 or so hours a day in the evening, until other commitments took me to other books. It was like hanging out in a sauna for six hours a day.)

At the moment, I’m cruising the Richard Stark’s (Donald Westlake) Parker novels, which I got turned onto by Neal Pollack’s review of them in LARB. Parker’s a doofus-y criminal, I imagine him chubby and large and perpetually almost knocking things over, like Pierre in War and Peace, even though he explodes with graceful violence when he needs to, most of the time bluntly, with his hands and knees.

The most interesting tic of the books so far is that Stark is committed to ending chapters at points of high intensity–a man coming through the window, say, or someone being shot in the chest by someone–and then cutting, at the beginning of the next chapter, back to the beginning of the action, or what led up to the action, but from the other side of things. So we see how the man got into the window, or how the shooting was planned. This happens sometimes multiple times in the books. It’s an odd tic, but it works, and reminds me of Auerbach’s description of time in myth (Mimesis)–that in the Odyssey, all stories happen in the present, and when cuts for the sake of back story happen–when Odysseus explains his scar, or tells of his wandering, one is given this information ultimately so the scar is as external and explained as it can possibly be. All information in myth is present and un-mysterious and historical context exists less to present history, but more to present the existence of the present. (Auerbach contrasts this with Abraham and Isaac, showing how reason and information, in the Bible, is often left for God to hide within Him). Interesting to think about this in connection with noir, where so much is or can be hidden. Most of the time what is dredged up is personal history and its puppet-stringing of the present–a man is a bastard, a woman is a prostitute–but in Parker novels the histories that are dredged up are those of action. How does this heist occur? Stark doesn’t want to explain away action through personal, emotional, subjective history–but instead describes action as methodical preparation on the part of thieves. The heist situates action situates character.

Parker himself destroys his background in the first two books–his wife commits suicide and he gets plastic surgery. We judge him through the way he handles things. I’m in the middle of the third book now, The Outfit, and part of the story revolves around the head of The Outfit, who Parker is trying to bring down, trying to find something, anything, any sort of weak-point for Parker (while, at the same time, complaining about his wife, no doubt his own weak-point). One suspects that Parker doesn’t have one. Except for the way he works. How to undercut movement, action, planning as weak-point?

Lady Rollins Score

From Painter of Modern Life

“Dandyism appears above all in periods of transition, when democracy is not yet all-powerful, and aristocracy is only just beginning to totter and fall. In the disorder of these times, certain men who are socially, politically, and financially ill at ease, but are all rich in native energy, may conceive of the idea establishing a new kind of aristocracy, all the more difficult to shatter as it will be based on the most precious, the most enduring faculties, and on the divine gifts which work and money are unable to bestow. Dandyism is the last spark of heroism amid decadence…Dandyism is a sunset; like the declining daystar, it is glorious, without heat and full of melancholy.”Image

Ashley on Opera

“But there could be another kind of opera, if opera is no more than storytelling and the evocation of an imaginary landscape in the form of music. There could be a kind of microcosmic opera, no bigger than–and as powerful as–hand magic, card tricks and disappearing coins, at a six foot distance. An opera to match our fascination with the microscopic world, an opera that has the tempo of very small things. This would differ dramatically from our old fascination with the tempo of very large things, the Coliseum, the Pyramids, the huge Russians with deep voices, the tempo of political change. We could live with an opera of extraordinary speed and extraordinary intricacy.” Robert Ashley in Outside of Time

Pere Goriot

Reading Balzac in one of my classes. The class is structured on a French class that I took at St. Johns–we read Balzac, then Flaubert, then Baudelaire (the only difference is that my class reads Bovary, in the original class we read A Simple Heart). The class was taught by Joshua Kates, a Derrida scholar, and was certainly the best course I had at the school, though I remember Kates’ presence more than anything else.

The class as I organize it moves through how each of the different authors deal with objects. Balzac’s realism nicely sets up Emma’s fantasies and Romantic connections to flowers and cigar boxes and what-have-you as well as laying a groundwork for the weirder encounters with objects one finds in Baudelaire. One knows Balzac for his objects, his long descriptions of clothes and houses and fashion, as well as his cynicism about those objects, the only real gift in the book is an empty box (an image that is repeated in Bovary’s cigar box), but reading the book within the context of this class for the second time I’ve taught it, as well as having some students thinking towards interesting ends, I began to also notice Balzac’s use of poetry and emotion as byproducts of the subject’s engagement with objects. While the book is most easily seen as a treatise on how cynical materialism gets in the way of true love, Balzac also shows the fallout of a world without access to the interiority that allows that kind of true love.

After showing Madame de Beauseant being betrayed by her lover, the Marquis Ajuda-Pinto, Balzac has his hero Eugene Rastignac think to himself (in a close third person):

He felt childishy angry. He could have groveled at her feet, he wished he had some demonic power with which to carry her off, clutched close to his heart, the way an eagle soars up from the plain to its mountain nest, bearing a small white suckling goat.

This is the only sort of internal monologue in Pere Goriot, characters either speak baldly, lie with reserve, or Balzac himself expounds like a detached dandy. How perfect that the only internal monologue we get from Eugene is this metaphor, emotion becoming material. He is not an abstract savior but an imagined eagle. For Balzac, thought is perverted by the material transaction.

Later on, when the Death-Dodger Collins (or Vautrin) is arrested and unmasked as the crook he really is, Balzac says of the crowd watching the reveal, watching Vautrin’s wig fall of in a punch from the police-captain:

Brick-red, short-clipped hair gave him a look at once sly and powerful, and both head and face, blending perfectly, now, with hs brutish chest, glowed with the fierce, burning light of a hellish mind. It was suddenly obvious to them all just who Vautrin was, what he’d done, what he’d been doing, what he would go on to do; they suddenly understood at a his implacable ideas, his religion of self-indulgence, exactly the sort of royal sensibility which tinted all his thoughts with cynicism, as well as all his actions…Prison language and prison ways, with their brusque transition from pleasant to horrible, their ghastly grandeur, their easy familiarity, their vulgarity, suddenly shown out in the [man]…although in truth he was no longer a man, but the embodied representative of a degraded people, a savage, logical nation, brutal, flexible. In an instant Collin had been transformed into a kind of hellish poem which depicted all human emotions except one, remorse. He looked the very image of the fallen archangel, forever militant. Rastignac lowered his eyes, accepting this criminal kinship as if in expiation for all his evil thoughts.

Rastignac is saved from his evil thoughts by Collins’ embodied poem, and this moment also acts as a forewarning against his eventual descent from the mountain. Collins is found due to a brand from prison on his shoulder–his embodied poem is not just up-speak from Balzac, his body as a body, as material presents itself to us as writing, as metaphor.

Wagner

After a bit of a slog through the first 150 pages of Opera and Drama, the book starts paying off:

“Just as the eye can only take up farther-lying objects in a proportionally diminished scale, so also the human brain–the inner starting point of the eye, and that to whose activity, conditioned by the whole internal organism, the eye imparts the shows which it has gathered from without–can only grasp them in the diminished scale of the human individuality.

More Hebdige

About the mods again:

“More subtly, the conventional insignia of the business world – the suit, collar and tie, short hair, etc. – were stripped of their original connotations – efficiency, ambition, compliance with authority – and transformed into ‘empty’ fetishes, objects to be desired, fondled and valued in their own right.”

At first I assumed that the new sartorial male might be trying to refill those empty signifiers with their original meaning–”my grandfather was working class and had a pocket square, I will also have a pocket square.” This seems to make sense in one way–without job stability, youth culture creates a suit that reinvigorates clothes and identity with old conservative ideals. Except so much of that side of the design (and butcher, and clothing) world is filled with the rhetoric of importance of those objects and clothes existing for their own sake. There’s no reason to have this pocket square, except that it’s beautiful. The fashion seems to suggest the conservative dandy–and where the dandy used to hope for a return of romantic antiquity, the shepherd, or the poet, or the king, the conservative dandy hopes for a return of the working class as a means, not to freedom through subcultural and group identity, but to bondage through the possibility of working as one individual among many, other, beautiful objects.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.