Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Received Date † | February 24, 2009 | ||||
Last Updated Date | February 25, 2009 | ||||
Start Date † | March 2009 | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures † |
The presence of prostate cancer in the tissue obtained by prostate needle biopsy [ Time Frame: This outcome parameter will be available 5 days after the biopsy has been done. E.g. there will be virtually no 'follow-up' period. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures † | Same as current | ||||
Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00851292 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures † |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures † | Same as current | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title † | The BIOPRES Trial: Transrectal BIOpsies of the PRostate: End Versus Side-Firing | ||||
Official Title † | The BIOPRES Trial; Transrectal BIOpsies of the PRostate: End Versus Side-Firing | ||||
Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to study the difference in prostate cancer between two prostate biopsy techniques, namely end-firing and side-firing. These differ in the angle at which the prostate is biopsied. |
||||
Detailed Description | Rationale: Research towards the efficacy of transrectal prostate biopsies has predominantly focused on the amount of biopsy cores. However, variation in the angle of entrance of the biopsy gun has been less studied. It is believed that obtaining biopsy cores by end firing will improve the efficacy, because of an improved sampling of the apical region. Objectives: To investigate the difference between side and end-firing in transrectal prostate needle biopsies in terms of qualitative and quantitative prostate cancer detection. Methods: From April 1st 2009 - April 1st 2011, all men with an initial prostate biopsy in a representative, Dutch, general hospital with six participating urologists and two residents will be subjected to a randomized controlled, single blind, single center, diagnostics trial. Men will be randomized for a biopsy using an end-firing or a side-firing probe. The primary endpoint is the prostate cancer detection rate; secondary endpoints are the number of cores invaded with prostate cancer, nomogram for indolent cancer-score, Gleason score, complications and biopsy length. Expected outcomes: We hypothesize that no differences between the biopsy techniques exist. |
||||
Study Phase | Phase III | ||||
Study Type † | Interventional | ||||
Study Design † | Diagnostic, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study | ||||
Condition † | Prostate Cancer | ||||
Intervention † | Device: TRUS probe | ||||
Study Arms / Comparison Groups | Active Comparator: prostate biopsies obtained with side-firing probe | ||||
Publications * | |||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status † | Not yet recruiting | ||||
Enrollment † | 1000 | ||||
Estimated Completion Date | December 2011 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | March 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria † | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Gender | Male | ||||
Ages | |||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
Contacts †† |
|
||||
Location Countries † | Netherlands | ||||
Expanded Access Status | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT ID † | NCT00851292 | ||||
Responsible Party | S. Roemeling, Amphia hospital | ||||
Secondary IDs †† | |||||
Study Sponsor † | Amphia Hospital | ||||
Collaborators †† | |||||
Investigators † |
|
||||
Information Provided By | Amphia Hospital | ||||
Verification Date | February 2009 | ||||
† Required WHO trial registration data element. †† WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists. |