Federal Trade Commission
Received Documents
July 8, 1996
P894219
B18354900333

                          DALE E. KILDEE
                      9TH DISTRICT, MICHIGAN

                  CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
                     HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
                    WASHINGTON, DC 20515-2209

The Honorable Robert Pitofsky
Chairman
Federal Trade Commission
Sixth and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Chairman Pitofsky:

     It is my understanding the Federal Trade Commission is conducting a comprehensive review
of the standard for "Made in U.S.A." advertising and labeling claims.  I would urge the Commission
not to weaken the current standard which limits the use of an unqualified "Made in Use,, claim to
products that meet the Hall or virtually all" test.

     It is my belief the current standard for such use of "Made in U.S.A." has served a valuable
purpose for American consumers.  The "Made in U.S.A." claim is an affirmative representation to all
consumers that Hall or virtually all" of the product in Question is of U.S. origin.

     I am concerned that some manufacturers who use foreign made parts or labor are seeking a
more relaxed standard on this issue.  I would hope the Commission would reject these appeals.  I am
concerned that a more flexible definition of the "Made in U.S.A." standard would undermine
incentives for American-based manufacturing facilities, and it would cost good-paying
American jobs.

     Therefore, I would once again urge the Commission to maintain the current standard as it
relates to unqualified "Made in U.S.A." claims for products.  Please make this letter part of the public
record in accordance with procedures under 61 F.R. 18600, April 26, 1996.  Thank you for your
consideration of this issue.

                            Sincerely,

                                 
                       Dale E. Kildee, M.C.