Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[EnglishLanguage 2867] Re: citizenship
Andrea Wilder
andreawilder at comcast.netTue Sep 23 19:06:50 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [EnglishLanguage 2863] Re: citizenship
- Next message: [EnglishLanguage 2869] Re: citizenship
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
History again--
What people came here looking for tolerance of difference? Not
original Virginians, they came to get rich. Plymouth Separatists
were financially supported a group in England--they were to send back
to England certain products--i forget right now, what, but sassafras
may have been in there. By my reading, most of the religious people
were motivated by a wish to do their own religious thing--tolerance
not in there.
Look for multiple motivations rather than pre-cut answers.
Andrea
On Sep 23, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Muro, Andres wrote:
> All three statements point to the importance of diversity. The
> third one is not too clear to me, even though I think that
> diversity makes a place more interesting, enjoyable with more
> variety in terms of language, food, music, activity, etc.
>
> I enjoy cities like NYC, DC, LA, San Francisco, El Paso, and Miami
> more than I enjoy cities that are uniform in culture. That is
> personal. I really like Astoria in NYC and the Upper West side.
>
> The first statement, one would hope, were true, since people
> historically came to the US looking for a place that would be
> tolerant of difference.
>
> The second one promotes tolerance.
>
> None of these statements state that diversity is the one and only
> thing, nor that they are more or less important than freedom,
> healthcare, education or the right to vote. They simply state that
> diversity is a very important theme.
>
> I would think that in the context of teaching diversity as one of
> the topics that an English teacher may want to cover, none of these
> statements are diluting other values that you or others may
> embrace, such as freedom, equality, etc. However, being that
> participants in the class are immigrants with different languages
> and cultural values, pointing that this country embraces diversity
> and difference may be a valuable thing to mention.
>
> This doesn't preclude stating that, for example, freedom is
> something extremely important that we value in the US. In fact,
> freedom and diversity go hand in hand.
>
> At another point in the class, a teacher may want to talk about
> equality and how important it is. On a different opportunity
> teachers may want to talk about health care, environmental
> responsibility, etc, voting rights, accessible education, etc.
>
> While teachers may address all this topics in and English class,
> particularly Civics education, I wouldn't think that any of these
> are the be all and end all, but they are all terribly important.
>
> I personally think that quality of life is above everything and is
> the be all and end all. However, I preface the statement with "I
> personally think". You can say that I think hat "high quality of
> life" is the be all and end all. On the other hand, I don't think
> that anyone stated that diversity is the be all and end all.
>
> Like Eduardo, I promise not to respond any more. I made the
> horrible mistake of signing up for a philosophy of quantum physics
> class and the tuition was much. I won't drop it but I am suffering
> quite a lot. I haven't taken math in 22 years and all we do is
> matrix algebra and differentials. So, I better go back to studying.
>
> Andres
>
>
>
> Please visit my art website at:
> http://www.geocities.com/andresmuro/art.html
>
> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Kearney Lykins
> Sent: Tue 9/23/2008 10:09 AM
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2860] Re: citizenship
>
> Andres,
>
> Here are three examples from the past 24 hours where subscribers to
> this list have suggested that diversity is numero uno:
>
>
> 1. "I also teach that diversity has been, is, and (hopefully)
> always will be the bond that unites us as a nation."
>
> 2. "When I talk to teachers about Civics instruction, I emphasize
> the importance of understanding and celebrating the rich cultural
> background and traditions of our immigrant (sic) as they seek to
> find their place in a new society. "
>
> 3. "Cultural diversity is ... terrific!"
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kearney
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Muro, Andres" <amuro5 at epcc.edu>
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>; The Adult English Language Learners
> Discussion List <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:29:12 AM
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2857] Re: citizenship
>
> Same question that Eduardo asked: Can you cite examples?
>
> Diversity is merely a fact that you have when different groups live
> together. Attempts to bleach difference result in resentment,
> hostility and discrimination. However, stating that, I haven't seen
> anyone saying the diversity is the be all and end all.
>
> Please visit my art website at:
> http://www.geocities.com/andresmuro/art.html
>
> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Kearney Lykins
> Sent: Tue 9/23/2008 8:50 AM
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2855] Re: citizenship
>
> Janet,
>
>
> I am saying that if you watch this list long enough, you'll see
> that I am right when I say that many subscribers to this list view
> "diversity" as a be-all and end-all, that they value "diversity" as
> a societal virtue above all others.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Kearney
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Janet Isserlis <Janet_Isserlis at brown.edu>
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:18:30 AM
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2853] Re: citizenship
>
> Kearney
>
> What are you saying here? Is this a threat? A promise? A foreboding?
>
> We'll see what?
>
> Janet
>
> From: Kearney Lykins <kearney_lykins at yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2850] Re: citizenship
>
> Eduaro,
>
>
>
> Stick around. You'll see.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Kearney
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Eduardo Honold <ehonol at sisd.net>
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 4:20:15 PM
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2843] Re: citizenship
>
> Kearney:
>
> I promise this will be my last post on this issue. I couldn’t
> agree more with you that freedom is a fundamental value in the U.S.
> Constitution, and that valuing diversity is derivative of that
> principle. And I don’t believe there is anybody on this list who
> would dispute this. Diversity is an empirical religious, ethnic,
> linguistic and cultural reality in the United States that,
> thankfully, is protected by our laws and our Constitution (and not
> without a struggle, I might add). Diversity is an expression of
> our freedom to choose who we are. I have no idea who you are
> referring to when you say that “diversity” has come to supplant
> “freedom.” I follow this list pretty regularly and I have never
> seen any posts in which diversity is, as you say, the “be-all and
> end-all that many on this list make it out to be.”
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Eduardo Honold
>
> Far West Project GREAT Coordinator
>
> (915) 937-1703
>
> fax: (915) 937-1795
>
> SISD Community Services
>
> 313 S. Rio Vista Rd.
>
> El Paso, TX 79927
>
> www.farwestgreat.org <http://www.farwestgreat.org/>
>
> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:englishlanguage-
> bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Kearney Lykins
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 12:23 PM
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion Li
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2837] Re: citizenship
>
>
> Eduardo, et al,
>
> I am only trying to make the point that diversity is not the be-all
> and end-all that many on this list make it out to be.
>
> Diversity is a derivative of freedom; you have to have the freedom
> before you can begin to entertain any notion of diversity. And thus
> it is freedom that I would think we would be the most dedicated to
> promoting, protecting, and celebrating, not diversity. Especially
> in a civics class.
>
> The first clause of the First Amendment provides a clear example of
> the subordination of diversity to freedom.
>
> "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
> religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
>
> This clause does not speak to what people are allowed to do, but
> only to what the government is not allowed to do; the people are
> free from government control. Hence, the First Amendment could care
> less if its language produces a nation that is 100% Methodist, or
> if it spawns the creation of 5,000 sects of everything under the
> sun. You might say that the First Amendment is utterly agnostic
> regarding diversity.
>
> Because diverse individual choices are the by-product of limits on
> government power, I don't understand how the term "diversity" has
> come to supplant "freedom" as that which is worth attending to.
> Diversity never made anyone free.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kearney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Eduardo Honold <ehonol at sisd.net>
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 3:52:27 PM
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2816] Re: citizenship
>
> Dear Kearney ,
>
> I’m not sure it always productive to participate in a polemic about
> the meaning of the Constitution or the original intent of its
> writers, but, alas, I can’t resist. I am no scholar of the US
> Constitution, but it seems to me that while the value of diversity
> may not have been explicitly addressed by the Constitution, it is
> clearly present in the Bill of Rights, particularly in the First
> Amendment protection of our right as individuals from undue
> interference by government in the establishment of religion and the
> preservation of free speech. I take these to mean that the
> government has no business telling me (a relatively recent citizen)
> what language I choose to speak at home, what movies I choose to
> watch, or how I should conduct my spiritual business, if at all.
> These are the values, I would argue, that make the U.S.
> Constitution a particularly powerful document, and certainly make
> me proud of being an American citizen. It is particularly
> interesting that you bring up the Soviet Union --the old
> Yugoslavia and Iraq under Sadam also come to mind—which, like
> Yugoslavia and Iraq, used state power to suppress cultural and
> political identity only to have it blow up on their faces.
>
> When I talk to teachers about Civics instruction, I emphasize the
> importance of understanding and celebrating the rich cultural
> background and traditions of our immigrant as they seek to find
> their place in a new society. I believe integration is more likely
> to take place if immigrants feel that welcomed, valued and
> respected by this society, and less likely to happen if it imposed
> by legislative fiat and the heavy hand of the government.
> Acculturation will take place eventually, especially as children
> and grandchildren are born and raised in this country, and there is
> very little evidence that respecting diversity has any impact on
> the extent to which children of immigrants learn English or become
> effective members of this society. So there is actually very
> little to fear from the promotion of diversity as a value, and much
> to be gained from the idea that we come from different backgrounds
> and experiences, but still manage to get along, work together, pray
> (or not) without a grave danger to our society.
> It is interesting how we can get very defensive about the effect of
> another culture on ours, as if there really were a monolithic
> American experience that we are all protecting. What are we
> protecting? Is it the notion of the United States as a Christian
> nation? (The 1st amendment has a problem with that). Is it the
> notion that English should be the only language spoken by Americans
> (This is already the case once you get past the first generation of
> immigrants.) Is it the vast array of cultural products coming out
> of Hollywood studios and TV (Am I willing to die for MTV, reality
> television, and Donald Duck? Maybe not, but they are certainly an
> integral aspect of our shared experience as Americans.) The point
> is that both immigrants and non-immigrants are constantly
> processing the incredibly heterogeneous and contradictory meanings
> of what it means to live in this society, and we all do the best we
> can to find our own understanding of who we are in relation to the
> whole.
>
> So Martin, keep discussing, celebrating and thinking about the
> diverse nature of the American experience. It will make all of us
> stronger.
>
>
>
> Eduardo Honold
>
> Far West Project GREAT Coordinator
>
> (915) 937-1703
>
> fax: (915) 937-1795
>
> SISD Community Services
>
> 313 S. Rio Vista Rd.
>
> El Paso, TX 79927
>
> www.farwestgreat.org <http://www.farwestgreat.org/>
>
>
> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:englishlanguage-
> bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Kearney Lykins
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 9:04 AM
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2810] Re: citizenship
>
>
> Martin,
>
>
>
> I second the notion that the best language classroom is not the
> classroom at all, but all those other real world places outside it.
> But I have to take issue with your civics lesson.
>
>
>
> In our nation's founding documents (e.g., The Declaration of
> Independence, The Consititution), and in the arguments (e.g. The
> Federalist Papers) that sought to bind us together in the first
> place, and in the second place (Lincoln's First and Second
> Inaugurals), I find no mention of "diversity" as the glue that
> bonds this nation. In fact, diversity (faction, competing
> interests, etc.) was named as the force which threatened to tear us
> apart.
>
>
>
> Rather, it has always been the common love of liberty (defined at
> the founding as limited, decentralized government) and not
> diversity, which has united us to the extent that we are, and which
> continues to attract people from places where liberty is but a vapor.
>
>
>
> Sure we are all different, but so was the Soviet Union with its 200
> distinct ethnic groups.
>
>
>
> Diversity is not the main attraction.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Kearney
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Martin Senger <MSenger at GECAC.org>
> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
> <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:17:42 AM
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2809] Re: citizenship
>
> Pax Stephen!
>
> I am a civics teacher for adults here in the US . I always stress
> that by learning about their new country, they are more apt to
> become involved in that environment, which is the best language
> classroom ever. Most of my students have limited access to an
> English-language environment, since they speak their L1 at home
> with family, and their social circles are often restricted to that
> L1. I always tell my students that if the only time they speak
> English is in my classroom, I will require them to buy me a nice
> retirement gift, because they will be in my class for the next 40
> years!
>
> I also teach that diversity has been, is, and (hopefully) always
> will be the bond that unites us as a nation. So it is perfectly
> acceptable to be completely different than everyone around you,
> just like everyone else! Viva le difference! (I hope my English is
> better than my French!)
>
> Ciao!
>
>
> Martin E. Senger
>
> Adult ESL Teacher
>
> GECAC / The R. Benjamin Wiley Learning Center
>
> Erie, Pa
>
> 814-490-8510
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:englishlanguage-
> bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Stephen Woulds
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 12:50 AM
> To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov
> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2808] citizenship
>
>
> Hi
>
> This website was created to help those teaching/learning English
> develop an understanding of citizenship as it relates to the United
> Kingdom . http://www.esoluk.co.uk <http://www.esoluk.co.uk/> There
> are however many people in the UK who are opposed to the teaching
> of 'citizenship'. It is becoming a hot political issue,
> particularly as language ability and cultural knowledge are being
> used as gate-keeping processes for entry into the UK . I'm
> wondering what other people's thoughts are on the teaching of
> citizenship to migrants, asylum seekers, etc, particularly within
> their own national contexts.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Adult English Language Learners mailing list
> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage
> Email delivered to janet_isserlis at brown.edu
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Adult English Language Learners mailing list
> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage
> Email delivered to andreawilder at comcast.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/englishlanguage/attachments/20080923/7b19535a/attachment.html
- Previous message: [EnglishLanguage 2863] Re: citizenship
- Next message: [EnglishLanguage 2869] Re: citizenship
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the EnglishLanguage discussion list