[Federal Register: September 19, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 182)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 54874-54876]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19se03-33]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-NM-360-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400, 777-200, and 777-
300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-400, 777-
200, and 777-300 series airplanes. This proposal would require, for
certain airplanes, replacement of the cell stack of the flight deck
humidifier with a supplier-tested cell stack, or replacement with an
end plate and subsequent deactivation of the flight deck humidifier.
For other airplanes, this proposal would require replacement of the
cell stack with a blanking plate or a new cell stack, or replacement of
the blanking plate with a supplier-tested cell stack. This action is
necessary to prevent an increased pressure drop across the humidifier
and consequent reduced airflow to the flight deck, which could result
in the inability to clear any smoke that might appear in the flight
deck. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Comments must be received by November 3, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-360-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232.
Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address:
9-anm-nprmcomment@faa.gov. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must
contain ``Docket No. 2000-NM-360-AD'' in the subject line and need not
be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached
electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 or 2000 or
ASCII text.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey S. Palmer, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-
4056; telephone (425) 917-6481; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this action may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Submit comments using the following format:
[sbull] Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a
request to change the compliance time and a request to change the
service bulletin reference as two separate issues.
[sbull] For each issue, state what specific change to the proposed
AD is being requested.
[sbull] Include justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each
request.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
[[Page 54875]]
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this action must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 2000-NM-360-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped
and returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 2000-NM-360-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
The FAA has received reports of sagging cell stack membranes of the
flight deck humidifiers on certain Boeing Model 747-400, 777-200, and
777-300 series airplanes. The sagging has been attributed to
difficulties encountered during the membrane welding process. The
result of the sagging membranes is an increased pressure drop across
the humidifier (if it is activated), and consequent reduced airflow to
the flight deck. These conditions, if not corrected, could result in
the inability to clear any smoke that might appear in the flight deck.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
21A2414, Revision 1, dated October 26, 2000 (for Model 747-400 series
airplanes), and Boeing Service Bulletin 777-21A0048, Revision 1, dated
September 7, 2000 (for Model 777-200 and 777-300 series airplanes).
Service Bulletin 747-21A2414 describes procedures for replacement of
the cell stack of the flight deck humidifier with a new or reworked
cell stack, or replacement with an end plate and subsequent
deactivation of the flight deck humidifier. Service Bulletin 777-
21A0048 describes procedures for replacement of the cell stack with a
blanking plate or a supplier-tested cell stack, or replacement of the
blanking plate with a supplier-tested cell stack. Accomplishment of the
actions specified in the service bulletins is intended to adequately
address the identified unsafe condition.
Boeing Service Bulletins 747-21A2414 and 777-21A0048 refer to
Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletins 821486-21-01 and 816086-21-01,
respectively (both dated March 15, 2000), as additional sources of
service information for replacement of the cell stack.
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-21A2414 also refers to Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-21-2405, which provides information for activation and
deactivation of the flight deck humidifier. Boeing Service Bulletin
777-21A0048 refers to Boeing Service Bulletin 777-21-0035, which
provides information for activation of the flightdeck humidifier.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the
proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions specified in
Boeing Service Bulletins 747-21A2414 and 777-21A0048, described
previously, except as discussed below.
Differences Between Proposed AD and Service Bulletins
Boeing Service Bulletins 747-21A2414 and 777-21A0048 recommend
replacing the cell stack within 60 days; the proposed AD would allow up
to 90 days. In developing an appropriate compliance time, we considered
the safety implications and operators' normal maintenance schedules for
the timely replacement of the cell stack. Therefore, with manufacturer
concurrence, we have determined that the proposed 90-day compliance
time represents an appropriate interval to replace the cell stack and
still maintain an adequate level of safety within the fleet.
Explanation of Certain Alternative Method of Compliance
Paragraph (c)(1) of this proposed AD would allow replacement of the
cell stack with a blanking plate provided the humidifier system is
deactivated. The service bulletin provides no procedures for
deactivating the humidifier system. Therefore, this option must be done
in accordance with a method approved by the FAA, or per data meeting
the type certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing
Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized
by the FAA to make such findings.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 35 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 12 airplanes of U.S. registry
would be affected by this proposed AD. The FAA provides the following
cost estimates, which would vary depending on the actions chosen by the
operator, to comply with this proposed AD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Work Hourly Parts Cost per
Model/series Action hours rate cost airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
747-400........................ Replace cell stack with supplier- 5 $65 $5,100 $5,425
tested cell stack.
747-400........................ Replace cell stack with end plate 6 65 0 390
and deactivate humidifier.
777-200........................ Replace cell stack with blanking 5 65 0 325
777-300........................ plate.
777-200........................ Replace cell stack with supplier- 5 65 6,053 6,378
777-300........................ tested cell stack.
777-200........................ Replace blanking plate with 3 65 6,053 6,248
777-300........................ supplier-tested cell stack.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements
of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions
in the future if this proposed AD were not adopted. The cost impact
figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time
necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD.
These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the
time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time
necessitated by other administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore,
[[Page 54876]]
it is determined that this proposal would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Boeing: Docket 2000-NM-360-AD.
Applicability: Model 747-400 series airplanes listed in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2414, Revision 1, dated October 26,
2000; and Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes listed in Boeing
Service Bulletin 777-21A0048, Revision 1, dated September 7, 2000;
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent an increased pressure drop across the humidifier and
consequent reduced airflow to the flight deck, which could result in
the inability to clear any smoke that might appear in the flight
deck, accomplish the following:
Cell Stack Replacement: Model 747-400
(a) For Model 747-400 series airplanes: Within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in either
paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD.
(1) Replace the cell stack of the flight deck humidifier with a
supplier-tested cell stack, in accordance with Part 1 of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2414, Revision 1, dated October 26,
2000.
(2) Replace the cell stack with an end plate and before further
flight deactivate the flight deck humidifier, in accordance with
Part 2 of the alert service bulletin. Replacement of the cell stack
with a supplier-tested cell stack in accordance with the 4
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this AD, if accomplished,
terminates the requirement to deactivate the humidifier.
Note 1: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2414 refers to
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-21-2405 as an additional source of
service information for deactivating the humidifier.
(b) Replacement of the cell stack before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
21A2414, dated April 13, 2000, is acceptable for compliance with the
applicable requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD.
Cell Stack Replacement: Model 777-200 and -300
(c) For Model 777-200 and 777-300 series airplanes: Within 90
days after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified
in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this AD, in accordance
with Boeing Service Bulletin 777-21A0048, Revision 1, dated
September 7, 2000.
(1) Replace the cell stack with a blanking plate, in accordance
with Part 1 of the service bulletin; and deactivate the humidifier
system before further flight in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or
per data meeting the type certification basis of the airplane
approved by a Boeing Company Designated Engineering Representative
who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such
findings. For a deactivation method to be approved, the approval
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Replace the cell stack with a supplier-tested cell stack, in
accordance with Part 2 of the service bulletin.
(3) Replace the blanking plate with a supplier-tested cell
stack, in accordance with Part 3 of the service bulletin.
Note 2: Boeing Service Bulletins 747-21A2414 and 777-21A0048
refer to Hamilton Sundstrand Service Bulletins 821486-21-01 and
816086-21-01, respectively, as additional sources of service
information for the cell stack replacement.
Part Installation
(d) On Model 747-400 series airplanes: As of the effective date
of this AD, no person may install a flight deck humidifier cell
stack having part number (P/N) 821482-1, unless ``DEV 13433'' is
also marked next to the cell stack part number.
(e) On Model 777-200 and 777-300 series airplanes: As of the
effective date of this AD, no person may install a flight deck
dehumidifier cell stack having P/N 822976-2, unless ``DEV 13433'' is
also marked next to the cell stack part number.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(f) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Seattle ACO,
FAA, is authorized to approve alternative methods of compliance for
this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 15, 2003.
Ali Bahrami,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 03-23934 Filed 9-18-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P