Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print    


Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

Results of the 2001 and 2002 Child and Family Service Reviews

Author: ACF
3/12/03

This PowerPoint presentation contains the compiled results of the 2001 and 2002 child and family services reviews.

View the entire presentation

 

View the presentation slide by slide

Results of the 2001 & 2002 Child and Family Service Reviews

The 17 States Reviewed in FY 2001

The 15 States Reviewed in FY 2002

Scope of Child and Family Service Reviews

Determining Substantial Conformity

Changes in Rating Criteria from 2001 to 2002

Number of Cases Reviewed

Percentage of African-American & White Children in the 2002 Cases

Over-Representation of Children of Color in the 2002 Foster Care Cases

Relationship between Race/Ethnicity and Adoption Ratings - 2002 reviews

Relationship between Race/Ethnicity and Preserving Connections Ratings

Number of States in Substantial Conformity on the 7 Outcomes

Safety Outcomes

Case Ratings for the Two Safety Outcomes

Ratings on Safety Outcome 2 for In-Home and Foster Care Cases

Risk of Harm Ratings for In-Home and Foster Care Cases

Common Concerns in "Risk of Harm" Ratings in 2002 States

Compliance with National Standards for Safety

Permanency Outcomes

Permanency Goals for Children in 2002 Cases

Common concerns in 2002 States regarding permanency goals

Common permanency concerns - continued

Case Ratings for Permanency Outcomes 1 & 2

Strength Ratings for Permanency Outcome 1 Indicators

2002 Cases

Additional Adoption Information

Common Concerns Regarding Adoption Delays in 2002 States

Strength Ratings for Permanency Outcome 2 Indicators

States Conforming to National Standards for Permanency

Well Being Outcomes

Percentage of Well Being Outcomes Rated Substantially Achieved

Strength Ratings for Well Being Outcome 1 Indicators for 2001 & 2002 by Cases

Strength Ratings for Well Being 1 Indicators for 2002 Only by States

Relationship of Caseworker Visits with Children and Other Outcomes in 2002 Cases

Relationship between Caseworker Visits with Children and Other Indicator Ratings in 2002 Cases (1)

Relationship between Caseworker Visits with Children and Other Indicator Ratings in 2002 Cases (2)

Relationship between Caseworker Visits with Children and Other Indicator Ratings in 2002 Cases (3)

Well-Being Outcome 1 Ratings for In-Home and Foster Care Cases

Physical & Mental Health Ratings for In-Home and Foster Care Cases

Comparision of Item Strengths for In-home Cases vs. Foster Cases in the 2002 Cases

Statistically Significant Differences in Case Ratings for In-home and Foster Care Cases

Statistically Significant Differences in Ratings for Fathers & Mothers in the 2002 Cases

Rank Order of Outcomes Across All Cases from Strongest to Weakest

Strongest and Weakest Outcome Indicators Across All Cases

Systemic Factors

Determining Substantial Conformity for Systemic Factors

Substantial Conformity Ratings for Systemic Factors

Number of States in Substantial Conformity on Systemic Factors

Case Review System

Relationship of Systemic Factors & Case Ratings in 2002 Cases: Case Review System

Relationship between Case Plans and Outcome Achievement

Relationship of Systemic Factors & Case Ratings in 2002 Cases: Case Review System

Service Array

Agency Responsiveness to the Community

Foster and Adoptive Parent Licensing, Recruitment, and Retention

Other Relationships Between Systemic Factors and 2002 Case Ratings

Strongest and Weakest Systemic Indicators

Summary of Major Points