 |
Table 2
Seaport Freight Capacity and Bottleneck Measures: 1999
Excel | CSV
| Long Beach |
1 |
18,687 |
20 |
1.12 |
1 |
265 |
| Oakland |
2 |
17,850 |
15 |
1.24 |
2 |
204 |
| Richmond |
3 |
15,465 |
18 |
1.15 |
3 |
155 |
| Boston |
4 |
13,138 |
37 |
0.48 |
6 |
116 |
| Port Everglades |
5 |
13,090 |
9 |
1.57 |
5 |
132 |
| New York |
6 |
12,573 |
26 |
0.98 |
7 |
110 |
| Honolulu |
7 |
12,239 |
40 |
0 |
17 |
71 |
| Miami |
8 |
12,232 |
17 |
1.18 |
4 |
133 |
| Baltimore |
9 |
11,815 |
22 |
1.08 |
16 |
72 |
| Tacoma |
10 |
11,731 |
10 |
1.56 |
8 |
102 |
| New Haven |
11 |
11,489 |
23 |
1.05 |
21 |
51 |
| Seattle Elliott Bay |
12 |
11,272 |
25 |
1 |
9 |
100 |
| Houston |
13 |
11,172 |
7 |
1.89 |
10 |
88 |
| Philadelphia |
14 |
10,381 |
27 |
0.94 |
15 |
73 |
| Paulsboro |
15 |
10,341 |
24 |
1.04 |
12 |
80 |
| Marcus Hook |
16 |
10,340 |
21 |
1.1 |
14 |
74 |
| Portland |
17 |
10,153 |
16 |
1.23 |
11 |
80 |
| Tampa Bay |
18 |
9,995 |
31 |
0.64 |
19 |
67 |
| Vancouver |
19 |
9,978 |
19 |
1.12 |
13 |
79 |
| Newport News |
20 |
9,876 |
32 |
0.58 |
18 |
69 |
| Norfolk Harbor |
21 |
9,571 |
34 |
0.51 |
20 |
64 |
| Providence |
22 |
9,206 |
38 |
0.21 |
24 |
36 |
| Jacksonville |
23 |
9,030 |
28 |
0.92 |
23 |
42 |
| New Orleans |
24 |
8,758 |
13 |
1.45 |
22 |
44 |
| Anacortes |
25 |
7,889 |
30 |
0.73 |
26 |
20 |
| Port Arthur |
26 |
7,408 |
2 |
2.97 |
31 |
5 |
| Baton Rouge |
27 |
7,123 |
1 |
3.21 |
28 |
15 |
| Pascagoula |
28 |
7,072 |
4 |
2.3 |
33 |
4 |
| Port of South Louisiana |
29 |
7,010 |
8 |
1.84 |
30 |
5 |
| Savannah |
30 |
6,626 |
12 |
1.51 |
29 |
10 |
| Mobile Harbor |
31 |
6,613 |
6 |
1.9 |
32 |
4 |
| Charleston |
32 |
6,552 |
29 |
0.75 |
27 |
17 |
| Portland |
33 |
5,814 |
36 |
0.48 |
35 |
3 |
| Lake Charles |
34 |
5,587 |
3 |
2.59 |
38 |
0.7 |
| Wilmington |
35 |
5,404 |
33 |
0.53 |
25 |
24 |
| Galveston |
36 |
5,000 |
39 |
0.14 |
36 |
1 |
| Corpus Christi |
37 |
4,658 |
11 |
1.53 |
34 |
3 |
| Freeport |
38 |
4,015 |
35 |
0.5 |
37 |
0.9 |
| Matagorda Ship Channel |
39 |
2,800 |
14 |
1.41 |
40 |
– |
| Port of Plaquemine |
40 |
U |
5 |
2.3 |
39 |
– |
1 This ratio compares the volume of freight transported to the relative
capacity of the transportation infrastructure in handling that level of freight.
It divides freight traffic on the transportation network by a measure of nominal
flow representing a reasonable annual traffic level for facilities of its
kind. Assigned flows in excess of nominal flow do not automatically imply a
capacity problem, merely that flows are above average for that type of facility.
KEY: – = value too small to report; AADT = average annual daily traffic; U
= data are unavailable.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics,
Intermodal Bottleneck Analysis Tool data, October 2001.
|
|
