Table 1,,,,,,
Airport Freight Capacity and Bottleneck Measures: 1999,,,,,,
Airport,AADT per lane-mile,,Freight-to-capacity ratio1,,Delay per lane-mile,
,Rank,Number,Rank,Ratio,Rank,Hours
San Francisco Internatl,1,"21,140",30,0.7,1,289
Chicago O'Hare Internatl,2,"19,792",9,1.6,2,275
Metropolitan Oakland Internatl,3,"19,737",18,1.2,4,260
Los Angeles Internatl,4,"18,919",39,0.2,3,269
Norman Y. Mineta San Jose Internatl,5,"15,484",28,0.8,10,134
Lambert-St. Louis Internatl,6,"15,378",17,1.2,12,114
Cleveland-Hopkins Internatl,7,"14,527",3,2.1,15,98
Minneapolis-St. Paul Internatl,8,"14,222",32,0.6,18,85
Miami Internatl,9,"14,070",12,1.5,6,159
San Diego Internatl,10,"13,453",37,0.3,13,104
Seattle-Tacoma Internatl,11,"13,390",20,1.2,9,136
Boston Logan Internatl,12,"13,365",38,0.3,8,141
Dallas/Fort Worth Internatl,13,"13,121",29,0.7,23,72
Washington Dulles Internatl,14,"12,992",15,1.4,7,157
Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood Internatl,15,"12,703",8,1.8,11,126
John F. Kennedy Internatl,16,"12,645",35,0.4,5,162
Newark Internatl,17,"11,999",19,1.2,21,74
Hartsfield Atlanta Internatl,18,"11,948",16,1.4,14,102
Salt Lake City Internatl,19,"11,883",31,0.7,27,60
Charlotte/Douglas Internatl,20,"11,825",4,2.1,30,56
Baltimore-Washington Internatl,21,"11,759",26,0.8,26,61
Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Internatl,22,"11,669",6,1.8,31,56
Indianapolis Internatl,23,"11,435",14,1.4,24,65
Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County,24,"11,427",34,0.5,19,84
Philadelphia Internatl,25,"11,041",25,0.8,16,87
James M. Cox Dayton Internatl,26,"10,836",7,1.8,37,31
"George Bush Intercontinental, Houston",27,"10,770",1,3,17,86
Sacramento Internatl,28,"10,756",13,1.4,33,44
Tampa Internatl,29,"10,595",33,0.6,20,82
Portland Internatl,30,"10,435",22,1,22,73
Denver Internatl,31,"10,068",24,0.9,28,59
Raleigh-Durham Internatl,32,"9,863",23,0.9,34,42
Phoenix Sky Harbor Internatl,33,"9,602",10,1.5,29,56
Ontario Internatl,34,"9,423",5,1.8,25,64
McCarran Internatl,35,"9,008",21,1.1,35,40
Pittsburgh Internatl,36,"8,831",36,0.4,38,27
Memphis Internatl,37,"8,661",11,1.5,36,37
Orlando Internatl,38,"8,393",2,2.3,32,52
Kansas City Internatl,39,"7,177",27,0.8,39,1
Anchorage Internatl,40,U,40,0,40,–
"1 This ratio compares the volume of freight transported to the relative capacity of the transportation infrastructure in handling that level of freight. It divides freight traffic on the transportation network by a measure of nominal flow representing a reasonable annual traffic level for facilities of its kind. Assigned flows in excess of nominal flow do not automatically imply a capacity problem, merely that flows are above average for that type of facility.",,,,,,
KEY: – = value too small to report; AADT = average annual daily traffic; U = data are unavailable.,,,,,,
"SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Intermodal Bottleneck Analysis Tool data, October 2001.",,,,,,