FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:                                                                      FOR RELEASE:
Cheryl Abbot, Regional Economist                                                              July 30, 2009    
(972) 850-4800                                                  
http://www.bls.gov/ro6/                 


                            COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES IN ARKANSAS: FOURTH QUARTER 2008

     Employment declined in the three largest counties in Arkansas from December 2007 to December 2008.  (Large 
counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2007 annual average employment.)  
Washington County had the largest decrease, down 2.4 percent, closely followed by Benton where employment fell 
2.2 percent.  Regional Commissioner Stanley W. Suchman noted that Pulaski County experienced a slower rate of 
job loss, declining 1.2 percent over the year.

     In comparison, employment nationwide fell 2.3 percent during the 12-month period as 285 of the 334 largest 
U.S. counties registered declines.  Elkhart County, Ind., recorded the largest over-the-year percentage decrease 
in employment in the country, down 17.8 percent, while Montgomery County, Texas, experienced the fastest growth, 
up 2.7 percent.

     Among the three largest counties in Arkansas, employment was highest in Pulaski County (250,300) in December 
2008.  The two other large Arkansas counties, Benton and Washington, had employment levels below 100,000.  
Employment in the three large counties accounted for 37.3 percent of the State’s total employment.  Nationwide, 
the 334 largest counties made up 71.5 percent of total U.S. employment.

     From the fourth quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter of 2008, Benton County recorded the fastest rate of 
increase in average weekly wages among Arkansas' largest counties, registering a gain of 6.3 percent.  (See 
table 1.)  Pulaski County had the highest wage level among the three large counties at $847 per week.  
Nationally, the average weekly wage increased 2.2 percent over the year to $918 in the fourth quarter of 2008.

     Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 72 counties in 
Arkansas with employment levels below 75,000.  All of the smaller counties had wage levels below the national 
average, but two -- Little River and Calhoun -- had average weekly wages above the State’s largest counties.  
(See table 2.)


Large County Wage Changes
     Benton County's 6.3-percent wage gain from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter of 2008 far 
surpassed the national average of 2.2 percent and ranked 15th among the nation’s largest counties.  (See 
table 1.)  Washington County registered a 2.2-percent wage increase during the period, matching the national 
average and ranking 181st.  In contrast, Pulaski County’s 14.3-percent decline was the largest in both the 
State and the nation.  A year-ago, Pulaski County ranked first in the country in wage growth.

     Nationwide, 180 large counties experienced higher over-the-year wage gains than the U.S. average.  St. 
Louis City, Mo., ranked first in wage growth, with an increase of 56.8 percent coming predominantly from the 
professional and business services and manufacturing supersectors.  Clayton County, Ga., was second with wage 
growth of 9.9 percent.  These two top-ranked areas were followed by Calcasieu and East Baton Rouge, La., and 
Jefferson, Texas, areas still recovering from previous hurricane-related losses.

     Wage growth was below the national average in 137 large counties in the United States and 43 of these 
experienced over-the-year declines.  As mentioned, Pulaski had the largest decrease in the nation and was the 
only county to experience a double-digit decrease (-14.3 percent).  Pulaski was followed by the counties of 
Lake, Ill. (-9.9 percent), Santa Clara, Calif. (-7.8 percent), Douglas, Colo. (-5.9 percent), and San Mateo, 
Calif. (-5.4 percent).


Large County Average Weekly Wages
     Despite Pulaski County's sharp over-the-year decline, its average weekly wage of $847 was the highest 
among the three large Arkansas counties.  Benton County closely followed at $844, after its above-average wage 
gain.  Both counties were within 10 percent of the national average ($918) and ranked in the middle of the 334 
large U.S. counties.  Washington County’s average weekly wages were notably lower ($747) and ranked 277th.

     There were 106 counties with an average weekly wage above the national average in the fourth quarter of 
2008.  New York, N.Y., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average weekly wage 
of $1,856.  Fairfield, Conn., was second with an average weekly wage of $1,596, followed by Washington, D.C. 
($1,570), Suffolk, Mass. ($1,568), and Santa Clara, Calif. ($1,566).

     More than two-thirds of the largest U.S. counties (228) reported average weekly wages below the national 
average.  The lowest was reported in Hidalgo, Texas ($574), followed by the counties of Horry, S.C. ($581), 
Cameron, Texas ($584), and Webb, Texas ($600).  Wages in these lowest-ranked counties were less than one-third 
of the average weekly wage reported for the highest-ranked county, New York.


Average Weekly Wages in Smaller Arkansas Counties
     All 72 smaller counties in Arkansas, those with employment below 75,000, had average weekly wages lower 
the national average of $918.  However, two of these, Little River ($880) and Calhoun ($855), reported wage 
levels above the three largest Arkansas counties.  Newton County reported the lowest weekly wage among the 
smaller counties, as well as the State, averaging $425 in the fourth quarter of 2008.  (See table 2.)

     When all 75 counties in Arkansas were considered, 13 reported average weekly wages under $500, 37 reported 
wages from $500 to $599, 17 had wages from $600 to $699, 4 had wages from $700 to $799, and 4 were above $800 
per week.  (See chart 1.)  The four top-paying counties included, or were near the areas of, Camden, 
Fayetteville, Little Rock, and Texarkana.  The lower-paid counties, those with wages under $500, were generally 
located along the western and northern borders of the State.


Additional Statistics and Other Information
     QCEW data for states has been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about 
quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit the QCEW Web site at 
www.bls.gov/cew/.

     An annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive information by detailed industry on 
establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states.  The 2007 edition of this bulletin 
contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as 
selected data from the first quarter 2008 version of the news release.  Tables and additional content from the 
2007 Employment and Wages Annual Bulletin are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn07.htm.  These 
tables present final 2007 annual averages.  The tables are also included on the CD which accompanies the 
hardcopy version of the Annual Bulletin.  Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 2007 is available online as a 
chartbook or for sale from the United States Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box  
371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250, telephone (866) 512-1800, outside Washington, D.C.  Within Washington, D.C., the 
telephone number is (202) 512-1800.  The fax number is (202) 512-2104.

     Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request.  Voice 
phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

     For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as 
well as other Bureau programs, contact the Dallas Information Office at 972-850-4800 from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 
a.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. CT.


                                               Technical Note

     Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) 
program, also known as the ES-202 program.  The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of 
workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce 
Agencies (SWAs).  The 9.1 million employer reports cover 136.6 million full- and part-time workers.  The 
average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly 
employment levels of those covered by UI programs.  The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a 
quarter.  It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts 
in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work.  Thus, wages 
may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage 
level.  Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on 
the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match 
the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

     QCEW data are not designed as a time series.  QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment 
records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time.  
Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons—some reflecting economic 
events, others reflecting administrative changes. 

     The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states 
as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site.  These potential differences result from the states’ 
continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time.  On the other hand, differences between data in 
this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year 
comparisons.  Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a 
correction to a previously reported location or industry classification.  Adjusting for these administrative 
changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one 
county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period.  Currently, adjusted data 
are available only from BLS press releases.  


Table 1. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the 3 largest counties in Arkansas, fourth quarter 2008 (2)
Area Employment Average Weekly Wage (3)
  December
  2008
(thousands)  
  Percent change,
  December
2007-08 (4)  
National
ranking by
percent change (5)
  Average
  weekly
wage
National
ranking by
level (5)  
  Percent change,
  fourth quarter
2007-08 (4)
National
ranking by
percent change (5)

United States (6)

133,870.4 -2.3 -- $918 -- 2.2 --

Arkansas

1,168.2 -1.5 18 706 47 -1.0 50

Benton, Ark.

94.7 -2.2 160 844 168 6.3 15

Pulaski, Ark.

250.3 -1.2 92 847 164 -14.3 324

Washington, Ark.

90.9 -2.4 177 747 277 2.2 181

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) & Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(5) Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
(6) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and all counties in Arkansas, fourth quarter 2008 (2)
Area Employment
December 2008    
Average
Weekly Wage (3)  

United States (4)

133,870,395 $918

Arkansas

1,168,162 706

Arkansas

10,040 662

Ashley

7,853 697

Baxter

14,551 596

Benton

94,662 844

Boone

13,839 617

Bradley

3,529 528

Calhoun

2,966 855

Carroll

9,959 501

Chicot

3,458 503

Clark

9,860 539

Clay

3,977 514

Cleburne

6,859 554

Cleveland

1,096 428

Columbia

9,100 686

Conway

7,081 610

Craighead

42,952 658

Crawford

19,766 586

Crittenden

16,711 627

Cross

5,134 551

Dallas

3,424 539

Desha

4,545 586

Drew

6,767 517

Faulkner

39,326 690

Franklin

4,379 616

Fulton

2,013 455

Garland

36,543 592

Grant

3,854 551

Greene

15,314 550

Hempstead

7,984 576

Hot Spring

7,543 607

Howard

7,611 539

Independence

15,342 618

Izard

3,135 482

Jackson

5,571 588

Jefferson

32,730 715

Johnson

9,094 548

Lafayette

1,431 548

Lawrence

4,059 496

Lee

2,143 521

Lincoln

2,992 543

Little River

4,865 880

Logan

5,800 543

Lonoke

12,630 573

Madison

3,200 517

Marion

3,813 497

Miller

12,981 641

Mississippi

19,461 723

Monroe

2,272 507

Montgomery

1,569 488

Nevada

2,421 541

Newton

1,103 425

Ouachita

7,711 569

Perry

1,431 601

Phillips

6,642 520

Pike

2,803 512

Poinsett

5,470 573

Polk

6,479 480

Pope

26,703 652

Prairie

1,433 568

Pulaski

250,252 847

Randolph

4,923 474

St. Francis

8,279 595

Saline

21,269 612

Scott

3,020 510

Searcy

1,764 438

Sebastian

71,940 689

Sevier

5,579 491

Sharp

3,802 467

Stone

2,931 453

Union

18,805 756

Van Buren

3,786 516

Washington

90,905 747

White

25,325 691

Woodruff

1,990 539

Yell

7,066 531

Footnotes
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

SOURCE: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages

Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, fourth quarter 2008 (2)
State Employment Average weekly wage (3)
  December
  2008
(thousands)  
  Percent change,
  December
2007-08 
  Average
  weekly
wage 
  National
  ranking by
level
  Percent change,
  fourth quarter
2007-08 
  National
  ranking by
percent change

United States (4)

133,870.4 -2.3 $918 - 2.2 -

Alabama

1,909.8 -3.1 790 33 3.5 16

Alaska

303.9 1.6 927 14 5.7 4

Arizona

2,557.9 -5.1 848 23 2.7 25

Arkansas

1,168.2 -1.5 706 47 -1.0 50

California

15,288.5 -3.2 1,042 6 0.7 48

Colorado

2,295.8 -1.5 932 13 0.5 49

Connecticut

1,688.0 -1.7 1,164 3 1.2 44

Delaware

416.8 -3.0 943 10 1.9 36

District of Columbia

687.5 0.3 1,570 1 5.1 6

Florida

7,586.6 -5.3 824 26 1.6 39

Georgia

3,970.3 -3.5 853 21 2.3 33

Hawaii

614.7 -3.5 821 28 3.5 16

Idaho

634.1 -3.9 693 48 1.0 45

Illinois

5,795.8 -2.3 985 8 1.0 45

Indiana

2,831.3 -3.4 764 38 2.7 25

Iowa

1,483.7 -1.0 756 39 3.1 19

Kansas

1,370.2 -0.2 769 36 3.1 19

Kentucky

1,783.2 -2.6 754 41 3.0 21

Louisiana

1,907.5 0.1 829 25 5.9 3

Maine

595.3 -2.1 735 42 4.0 11

Maryland

2,531.8 -1.9 1,010 7 2.4 31

Massachusetts

3,239.6 -1.1 1,154 4 1.8 38

Michigan

3,993.3 -4.9 903 17 3.6 15

Minnesota

2,658.8 -1.9 907 16 2.6 27

Mississippi

1,117.2 -2.8 679 49 3.8 13

Missouri

2,700.9 -1.7 842 24 7.9 1

Montana

433.8 -1.5 678 50 2.9 23

Nebraska

923.1 -0.3 730 45 1.0 45

Nevada

1,206.5 -6.5 862 20 -1.1 51

New Hampshire

626.2 -2.0 936 11 2.2 34

New Jersey

3,927.7 -2.4 1,123 5 2.8 24

New Mexico

821.2 -1.2 768 37 3.9 12

New York

8,677.4 -1.0 1,169 2 1.4 40

North Carolina

4,003.8 -3.0 793 31 1.9 36

North Dakota

354.4 1.9 725 46 5.1 6

Ohio

5,167.5 -3.2 816 29 2.6 27

Oklahoma

1,559.8 0.0 755 40 4.9 8

Oregon

1,676.6 -3.7 808 30 1.3 43

Pennsylvania

5,645.8 -1.3 897 18 2.6 27

Rhode Island

464.3 -3.4 887 19 5.7 4

South Carolina

1,837.1 -3.5 731 44 2.1 35

South Dakota

395.2 0.4 663 51 2.5 30

Tennessee

2,695.7 -3.3 824 26 1.4 40

Texas

10,510.8 0.4 933 12 2.4 31

Utah

1,215.0 -2.1 770 35 1.4 40

Vermont

304.4 -1.7 774 34 4.3 9

Virginia

3,656.8 -1.3 953 9 3.3 18

Washington

2,885.0 -1.8 918 15 3.7 14

West Virginia

713.8 -0.1 735 42 7.1 2

Wisconsin

2,753.2 -1.9 793 31 3.0 21

Wyoming

284.5 1.5 850 22 4.3 9

Puerto Rico

1,028.5 -2.9 528 (5) 2.3 (5)

Virgin Islands

45.5 -1.4 731 (5) -0.8 (5)

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) & Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(5) Data not included in the national ranking.

Chart 1. Average weekly wages by county in Arkansas, fourth quarter 2008

Average weekly wages by county in Arkansas, fourth quarter 2008
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

Last Modified Date: July 31, 2009