Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 93* 98 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 108* 115* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 102 106 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 100 104 Bloomington, IN....................... 95* 97 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 107* 114* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 119* 120* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 81* 86* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 108* 99 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 97* 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 108* 113* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 115* 113* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 103 103 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 107* 106 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 106* 114* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 93* 98 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 103 110* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 103* 111* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 109* 111* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 112* 108* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 101 109* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 107* 105 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 106* 99 Great Falls, MT....................... 94* 91* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 100 101 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 99 108* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 120* 123* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 101 104 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110* 119* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 101 110* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91* 92* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 112* 103 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 103 96* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 105* 105* Bloomington, IN....................... 101 93* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 112* 109* Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 120* 121* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 97 81* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 103 115* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 102 91* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 102 107* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 119* 113* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 109* 109* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 110* 108* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 104 108* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 99 89* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 109* 99 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 103 102 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 110* 113* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 115* 110* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 100 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 107* 102 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 104 111* Great Falls, MT....................... 84* 102 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 104 101 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 98 103 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 120* 129* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 93* 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110* 121* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 107* 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 93* 91* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 99 109* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 107* 99 Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 98 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 85* 93* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 102 99 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 109* 118* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 70* 79* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 105 101 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 99 96* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 115* 106* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 112* 113* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 94 100 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 101 104 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 108 102 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 89* 89* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 104 102 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 99 95* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 108 106* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 101 108* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 97 95* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 108* 105* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 108* 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 93* 85* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 88* 99 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 89* 96* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 110* 116* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 93* 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 111* 99 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 98 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 83* 90* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 93 106 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 89* 111* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 88* 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 78* 86* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 109 98 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 128* 122* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 67* 91* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 117* 111* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 80* 87* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 91 105 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 135* 119* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 92 105 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 105 108 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 101 107 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 96 83* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91 102 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 104 106 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 95 114* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 103 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 117* 94 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 107 111* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 122* 105 Great Falls, MT....................... 113* 98 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 91* 97 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 81* 89* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 118 118* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 104 94 Honolulu, HI.......................... 118* 113* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 92 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 98 90* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 112* 105 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 103 90* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 94 93* Bloomington, IN....................... 104 103 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 117* 102 Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 116* 110* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 82* 73* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 115* 101 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 109* 100 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 109* 97 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 112* 104 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 108 98 Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 112* 103 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 103 97 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 98 84* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 98 96 Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 114* 101 Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 107 101 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 126* 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 104 98 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 107* 108* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 108* 97 Great Falls, MT....................... 107 95 Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 110* 100 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 114* 91* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 121* 106 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 108* 99 Honolulu, HI.......................... 118* 99 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 109* 92* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 102 102 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 102 88 Iowa City, IA......................... 103* 113* Johnstown, PA......................... 91* 88* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 105* 101 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 109* 107 Knoxville, TN......................... 98 115* Lincoln, NE........................... 94* 93* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 114* 119* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 101 100 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 100 107* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 104* 115* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 108* 110* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 115* 123* Mobile, AL............................ 95* 86* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 104* 100 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 122* 128* Ocala, FL............................. 95* 89 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 96* 95 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 97 101 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 100 95 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 111* 118* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 104* 114* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 102 105 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 111* 111* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 116* 118* Reading, PA........................... 108* 122* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 103* 105 Richmond, VA.......................... 104* 108* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 104 104 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 107* 100 Iowa City, IA......................... 101 107* Johnstown, PA......................... 93* 93* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 108* 104 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 105* 122* Knoxville, TN......................... 109 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 94* 98 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 118* 116* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 100 110* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 97 93* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 107* 106* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 106 107* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 115* 123* Mobile, AL............................ 91* 91* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 110* 100 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 128* 123* Ocala, FL............................. 91* 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 97 97 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 94* 101 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 96 107* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 119* 112* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 111* 105* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 104 102 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 107* 119* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 124* 123* Reading, PA........................... 102 107* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 104 104* Richmond, VA.......................... 104 104* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 105 95 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 97 99 Iowa City, IA......................... 96 101 Johnstown, PA......................... 88* 87* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 103 101 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 104 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 102 97 Lincoln, NE........................... 86* 91* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 117* 110* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 102 99 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 103 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 98 100 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 108 106* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 113* 107* Mobile, AL............................ 97 95* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 105 102 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 119* 119* Ocala, FL............................. 96 93* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 91* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 103 91* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 98 91* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 101 110* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 109 102 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 93* 101 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 117* 109* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 105 110* Reading, PA........................... 109* 105* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 107* 100 Richmond, VA.......................... 98 104* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 91 96 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 98 101 Iowa City, IA......................... 106 108 Johnstown, PA......................... 99 94 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 105 105 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 111* 101 Knoxville, TN......................... 84* 90* Lincoln, NE........................... 86* 99 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 114* 116* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 109 98 Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 96 105 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 95 101 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 112 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 114* 110 Mobile, AL............................ 94 104 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 95 99 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 136* 121* Ocala, FL............................. 83* 112* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 105 113* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 92 97 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 94 109 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 109 118* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 84* 109 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 100 102 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 118* 117* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 116* 118* Reading, PA........................... 105 114* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 97 116* Richmond, VA.......................... 94 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 109* 93 Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 114* 95 Iowa City, IA......................... 108* 97 Johnstown, PA......................... 91* 85* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 113* 96 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 104 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 95 95 Lincoln, NE........................... 96 91* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 108* 102 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 107 90* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 104 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 102 99 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 112* 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 124* 106 Mobile, AL............................ 100 100 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 108* 103 New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 114* 108* Ocala, FL............................. 99 102 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 92* 82* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 92 106 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 115* 104 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 107 102 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 104 99 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 105 94 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 108 97 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 119* 104 Reading, PA........................... 109* 98 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 104 97 Richmond, VA.......................... 109* 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Rochester, NY......................... 103* 98 Rockford, IL.......................... 105* 98 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 115* 115* Salinas, CA........................... 121* 127* San Antonio, TX....................... 97* 104 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 116* 119* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 126* 125* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 117* 114* Springfield, MA....................... 117* 112* Springfield, MO....................... 93* 93* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 109* 107 Tallahassee, FL....................... 98 92* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 97* 95 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 104* 118* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 115* 116* York-Hanover, PA...................... 103* 117* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 101 110* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Rochester, NY......................... 106* 113* Rockford, IL.......................... 107* 105* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 121* 119* Salinas, CA........................... 132* 126* San Antonio, TX....................... 102 93* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 121* 123* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 130* 132* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 113* 126* Springfield, MA....................... 124* 114* Springfield, MO....................... 96 92* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 110* 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 94 102 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 100 100 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 114* 107* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 122* 113* York-Hanover, PA...................... 109* 105* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 103 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Rochester, NY......................... 100 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 101 99 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 107 109* Salinas, CA........................... 132* 116* San Antonio, TX....................... 99 94* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 108 109* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 127* 124* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 116* 109* Springfield, MA....................... 113* 114* Springfield, MO....................... 94* 89* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 99 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 94* 93 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 95* 95* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 101 101 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 109* 116* York-Hanover, PA...................... 93* 99 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 89* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Rochester, NY......................... 100 93 Rockford, IL.......................... 110 105 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 104 122* Salinas, CA........................... 129* 113* San Antonio, TX....................... 99 108 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 114* 115* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 126* 121* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 113* 113* Springfield, MA....................... 112* 110 Springfield, MO....................... 79* 93 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 124* 117* Tallahassee, FL....................... 83* 93 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 99 Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 91* 95 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 102 121* York-Hanover, PA...................... 102 104 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 97 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2007 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Rochester, NY......................... 106 97 Rockford, IL.......................... 110* 100 Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 122* 107 Salinas, CA........................... 109* 102 San Antonio, TX....................... 105 87* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 113* 99 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 116* 107 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 126* 110* Springfield, MA....................... 117* 111* Springfield, MO....................... 100 96 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 113* 109 Tallahassee, FL....................... 100 91* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 99 88* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 111* 92* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 115* 104 York-Hanover, PA...................... 104 102 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 109* 108* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.