Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 88* 93* Anchorage, AK......................... 109* 104 Atlanta, GA........................... 102 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 94* 89* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 95* 91* Birmingham, AL........................ 94* 92* Bloomington, IN....................... 90* 89* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112* 110* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 78* 73* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 91* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 93* 98* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 101 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108* 104* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 98* 93* Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 100 96 Columbus, OH.......................... 100 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 87* 92* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 98* 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 98* 99* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 102 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106* 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 96* 96* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 94* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 101* 93* Great Falls, MT....................... 87* 85* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 95* 91* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 94* 95* Hartford, CT.......................... 112* 108* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 95* 89* Honolulu, HI.......................... 105* 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 96* 100 Huntsville, AL........................ 96* 94 Indianapolis, IN...................... 97* 82* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85* 87* Anchorage, AK......................... 100 121* Atlanta, GA........................... 102 97 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 100 89* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 95* 93* Birmingham, AL........................ 95* 101 Bloomington, IN....................... 97* 90* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 108* 113* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 95* 76* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 91* 106* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 94* 86* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93* 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 107* 107* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 99 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 101 98 Columbus, OH.......................... 92* 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 94* 83* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 101 96* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 92* 96* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 102 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 104* 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94* 96* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95* 94* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 97* 104* Great Falls, MT....................... 76* 94* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 94* 95* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 90* 97* Hartford, CT.......................... 108* 119* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 89* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 104 110* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 98 87* Huntsville, AL........................ 96* 95* Indianapolis, IN...................... 97 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 90* 87* Anchorage, AK......................... 108* 106* Atlanta, GA........................... 97 104* Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 83* 96* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 97* Birmingham, AL........................ 94* 96* Bloomington, IN....................... 78* 88* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 106* 113* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75* 77* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 105* 99* Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 101 93* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 109* 102 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 106* 109* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 94 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 95 101 Columbus, OH.......................... 105 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88* 84* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 103 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 97* 92* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 104 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 101 105* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95* 92* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 106* 101* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 109* 100 Great Falls, MT....................... 88* 80* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 86* 97* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91* 93* Hartford, CT.......................... 108* 112* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 91* 95* Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 95 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 100 96* Indianapolis, IN...................... 95 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 83* 81* Anchorage, AK......................... 125* 111* Atlanta, GA........................... 93 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 95* 97* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88* 100 Birmingham, AL........................ 84* 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 78* 85* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 124* 115* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 67* 78* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 111* 100 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 80* 82* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 92* 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 125* 114* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 90 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 101 102 Columbus, OH.......................... 98 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92* 81* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90* 95* Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 100 106* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 91 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 109* 92* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 104* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 106* 96* Great Falls, MT....................... 118* 100 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 91* 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 82* 84* Hartford, CT.......................... 114 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 98 91* Honolulu, HI.......................... 113* 115* Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 91* 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 91* 90* Indianapolis, IN...................... 93* 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 92* Anchorage, AK......................... 115* 110* Atlanta, GA........................... 103 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 98 96* Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 94* 91* Birmingham, AL........................ 87* 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 97* 104* Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 108* 111* Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 76* 76* Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 111* 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 101 104* Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 104 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 104* 106* Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 100 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 105* 106* Columbus, OH.......................... 96 101 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 89* 86* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91* 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 107* 105* Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 103 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 118* 108* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95* 111* Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 102* 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 96* 92* Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 101 104* Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 105* 95* Hartford, CT.......................... 111* 107* Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 100 102 Honolulu, HI.......................... 106 104 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 100 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 100 93* Indianapolis, IN...................... 108* 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 98* 95* Johnstown, PA......................... 87* 86* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 99 93* Knoxville, TN......................... 92* 103* Lincoln, NE........................... 89* 85* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 107* 106* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96* 91* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 93* 85* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 95* 96* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 96* 107* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102* 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 108* 101 Mobile, AL............................ 88* 81* New Orleans, LA....................... 95* 90* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 114* 114* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 91* 87* Ocala, FL............................. 90* 88* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91* 87* Orlando, FL........................... 93* 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 105* 106* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 97* 99 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 96* 91* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 104* 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 108* 109* Reading, PA........................... 102* 105* Reno, NV.............................. 98* 97* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 103* 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 98* 98* Rochester, NY......................... 97* 89* Rockford, IL.......................... 100 90* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 106* 102 Salinas, CA........................... 113* 115* San Antonio, TX....................... 89* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 95* 102* Johnstown, PA......................... 91* 89* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 95* 95* Knoxville, TN......................... 98* 84* Lincoln, NE........................... 88* 91* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 109* 109* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96* 103* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 81* 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 92* 91* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 95* 96* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 104* 118* Mobile, AL............................ 85* 84* New Orleans, LA....................... 96* 91* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 116* 114* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 90* 95* Ocala, FL............................. 88* 92* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85* 91* Orlando, FL........................... 88* 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 107* 105* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 101 96* Pittsburgh, PA........................ 97 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 95* 112* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 111* 112* Reading, PA........................... 94* 101 Reno, NV.............................. 95* 99 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 95* 113* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 95* 98* Rochester, NY......................... 97* 104* Rockford, IL.......................... 97* 99* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 107* 111* Salinas, CA........................... 121* 115* San Antonio, TX....................... 91* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 92* 101 Johnstown, PA......................... 86* 84* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 98* 95* Lincoln, NE........................... 85* 87* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 115* 106* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 98* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 96* 89* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 104* 98* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 95* 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102 104* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 109* 103* Mobile, AL............................ 95* 90* New Orleans, LA....................... 101 96* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 112* 114* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94* 91* Ocala, FL............................. 93* 88* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93* 89* Orlando, FL........................... 101 90* Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 106* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 107 101 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 89* 97* Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 110* 105 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103* 106* Reading, PA........................... 106* 102* Reno, NV.............................. 101 99 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 105* 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 99 99* Rochester, NY......................... 96* 98* Rockford, IL.......................... 100 97* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 104* Salinas, CA........................... 129* 111* San Antonio, TX....................... 84* 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 101 102 Johnstown, PA......................... 96* 88* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 108 104 Knoxville, TN......................... 85* 87* Lincoln, NE........................... 85* 93* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 110* 106* Louisville, KY-IN..................... 110* 94* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 92* 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94* 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 91* 93* Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 110* 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 113* 107 Mobile, AL............................ 94* 98 New Orleans, LA....................... 90* 91* New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 128* 114* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 87* 94* Ocala, FL............................. 83* 106* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 101 108* Orlando, FL........................... 91* 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 106* 112* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 82* 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 96 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 114* 110* Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 104* 108* Reading, PA........................... 102 100 Reno, NV.............................. 96* 111* Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 111* 93* Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 92* 99 Rochester, NY......................... 94* 89* Rockford, IL.......................... 111* 104* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 103 118* Salinas, CA........................... 132* 110* San Antonio, TX....................... 97* 97* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 101 96* Johnstown, PA......................... 84* 82* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 89* 96* Lincoln, NE........................... 91* 91* Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 102 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 94* Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 105* 103* Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97* 96* Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 97 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 106* 107* Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 117* 107* Mobile, AL............................ 96* 91* New Orleans, LA....................... 95* 100 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 105* 110* Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93* 89* Ocala, FL............................. 95* 103* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89* 87* Orlando, FL........................... 85 106 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 108* Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 96 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 99 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 112* 105* Reading, PA........................... 99 102* Reno, NV.............................. 98 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 98 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 102* 100 Rochester, NY......................... 100 100 Rockford, IL.......................... 103* 104* Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 111* 108* Salinas, CA........................... 95* 104* San Antonio, TX....................... 96* 86* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Diego, CA......................... 108* 106* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 119* 114* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 109* 103 Springfield, MA....................... 109* 104* Springfield, MO....................... 87* 82* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 101 97 Tallahassee, FL....................... 91* 81* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 95* 89* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 99* 101 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 107* 103 York, PA.............................. 97* 102 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 96* 96* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Diego, CA......................... 110* 112* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 117* 123* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 99 119* Springfield, MA....................... 109* 105* Springfield, MO....................... 88* 84* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 99 94* Tallahassee, FL....................... 90* 96* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 91* 95* Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 98* 101 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 107* 106* York, PA.............................. 98* 98* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 93* 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Diego, CA......................... 106 105* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 124* 122* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 111* 108* Springfield, MA....................... 113* 110* Springfield, MO....................... 91* 86* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 100 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 92* 91* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 98 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 102 97* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 106* 111* York, PA.............................. 91* 95* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 92* 92* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Diego, CA......................... 107 107* San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 122* 117* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 111* 106* Springfield, MA....................... 105* 110* Springfield, MO....................... 77* 91* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 117* 107 Tallahassee, FL....................... 88* 87* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 97 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92* 93* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 116* York, PA.............................. 102 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 99 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Diego, CA......................... 104 101 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 108* 108* Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 117* 113* Springfield, MA....................... 108* 115* Springfield, MO....................... 94* 89* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104 108 Tallahassee, FL....................... 95* 93* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93* 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 105* 97* Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 108* 106* York, PA.............................. 96* 103* Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 102* 110* * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the national average of all areas at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ncspay.tn.htm. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.