U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program--Proceedings
of the Technical Meeting, Colorado Springs, Colorado, September 20-24, 1993,
Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4015
A Comparison of Two Analytical Techniques For Identifying and
Measuring the Concentrations of Volatile Hydrocarbons in Ground Water
by
Curtis S. Phinney (U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.), and
Isabelle M. Cozzarelli (U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.)
Abstract
Identification of monoaromatic hydrocarbons in ground water
is commonly performed in circumstances where petrochemical contamination
is suspected. Presence of certain of these species is considered
indicative of petrochemical contamination. Most studies of ground-water
contamination focus on the fate of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene,
and the xylenes (BTEX). However, a broad range of C6-C10
aromatic hydrocarbons can be present in ground water contaminated
with petroleum products. In this study, results of a comparison
of two analytical techniques for the identifying and
measuring the concentrations of C6-C10 monoaromatic
hydrocarbons are presented. The techniques investigated are pentane/water
microextraction followed by gas chromatography/flame ionization
detection (GC-FID), and purge and trap (open-loop) stripping
of the sample followed by GC-Ion Trap detection (GC-ITD).
Open-loop/GC-ITD allows the identification of 35 C6-C10
aromatic hydrocarbons, compared to 21 identified by pentane/GC-FID.
Compared to the pentane/GC method, higher sensitivity,
higher selectivity, but lower precision were observed for samples
analyzed by open-loop/GC-ITD. Hydrocarbon concentrations measured
by the two techniques were generally in good agreement,
within 88.6-99.7 percent for total mono-aromatics. Concentrations
of some trace constituents measured by pentane/GC-FID were
higher under certain circumstances. For example, difficulty in
resolving benzene from interferences by the pentane/GC-FID method
sometimes resulted in considerably higher benzene and BTEX
concentrations compared to open-loop/GC-ITD. At a sample
site where hydrocarbon concentrations were low, mean BTEX concentrations
(n=10) were 661 µg/L (micrograms per liter) by pentane/GC-FID
compared to 490 µg/L by open-loop/GC-ITD. At a high
concentration sample site, mean BTEX concentrations (n=10)
were 5,077 µg/L by pentane/GC-FID compared to 5,089 µg/L
by open-loop/GC-ITD.
|
|